Main Article Content

Abstract

To improve the economic capability of a region, one of them is by investing in the Endogenous Development paradigm, the strategy is to harmonize natural forces with the strength of human resources. However, we still find many problems when we will make this investment, one of the problems is related to licensing which is still very complicated, requires a very long bureaucratic path, and buys complicated. This is what encourages researchers to research the problem of the still difficult licensing path. Researchers conducted this study using qualitative research methods which analyzed data from interviews through informants related to investment. The results obtained in this study show that there is still a high gap between investment interest and investment realization, which is one of the causes is still There are weaknesses in bureaucratic behavior in implementing policies on investment.

Keywords

Bureaucratic Behavior Institutional Investment Licensing Services

Article Details

How to Cite
Widaningsih, Rulandari, N., & Fatma, E. (2023). Government Bureaucratic Behavior in Optimizing Institutional Investment Licensing Services (Case Study in Garut Regency). Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(3), 518-527. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i3.766

References

  1. Amin, R. I. (2022). ASYMMETRICAL SEQUENTIAL DECENTRALIZATION: RESETTING THE PARADIGM OF REGIONAL AUTONOMY. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(4), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i4art3
  2. Aritenang, A. F. (2021). The contribution of foreign investment and industrial concentration to firm competitiveness in Jakarta Megacity. Cities, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103152
  3. Arjaya, I. M., & Budiartha, I. N. P. (2021). THE ROLE OF INVESTMENT LICENSING IN BALI ECOTOURISM (CSR CHANNELING). Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(7), 1–12. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85112598928&partnerID=40&md5=a7a34e2da1c3e516f95591d3112846db
  4. Bjorna, H., & Synnone, J. (2006). Prefectoral System and Central-Local Government Relations in Scandinavia. Wiley Online Library, 29(ue 4).
  5. Campisi, J. M., & Caprioni, E. (2017). Social and Political Risks: Factors Affecting FDI in China’s Mining Sector. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(6), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21830
  6. Cheshire, L., Everingham, J.-A., & Lawrence, G. (2014). Governing the impacts of mining and the impacts of mining governance: Challenges for rural and regional local governments in Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.010
  7. Cui, L., Fan, D., Li, Y., & Choi, Y. (2020). Regional competitiveness for attracting and retaining foreign direct investment: a configurational analysis of Chinese provinces. Regional Studies, 54(5), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1636023
  8. Dai, H. (2016). From personal ties to village welfare: Changing community bonding in post-socialist rural China. Community Development Journal, 51(4), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv048
  9. Eraqi, M. I. (2014). Responsible tourism management as an integrated approach for enhancing the standards of living of local people in Egypt. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 17(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2014.057993
  10. Harangozo, G., Csutora, M., & Kocsis, T. (2018). How big is big enough? Toward a sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth paradigm. Sustainable Development, 26(2), 172–181.
  11. Hundsbæk Pedersen, R., & Bofin, P. (2019). Muted market signals: politics, petroleum investments and regulatory developments in Tanzania. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2019.1605770
  12. Islam, M. A., Khan, M. A., Popp, J., Sroka, W., & Oláh, J. (2020). Financial development and foreign direct investment-the moderating role of quality institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093556
  13. John, Z. H. (2012). The Hand Book of Leaders. MC Graw Hill.
  14. Joseph, R. (2019). Poverty, Welfare, and Self-Sufficiency: Implications for the Social Work Profession. Journal of Poverty, 23(6), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2019.1616037
  15. Kameda, K., Lu, Z., & Fukui, M. (2022). Comparison of the productivity of public capital by project type: Central-government, subsidized-local, and unsubsidized-local projects in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2022.101119
  16. Lecovic. (2011). Language and Cultural Diversity Global Realistic and Challenges. The Guilford Press.
  17. Matafonova, Y. A., & Gordeeva, T. N. (2017). Local identity and social activity as factors of sustainability and socio-political safety of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation. Man in India, 97(10), 433–447. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85025074277&partnerID=40&md5=e10f6cabaeeb33d97d883b21824f69de
  18. Mendoza-Velázquez, A., Rondero-Garcia, A., & Conde-Cortés, L. D. (2021). Foreign Direct Investment and Employment Growth in the States of Mexico: Competitiveness and Social Progress. International Regional Science Review, 44(6), 709–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620979665
  19. Moleong, & J., L. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  20. Muin, F., Mucharom, R. S., & Izziyana, W. V. (2020). Synergy of government and regional government authority in providing health guarantee for communities in Indonesia. Medico-Legal Update, 20(1), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.37506/v20/i1/2020/mlu/19433673
  21. Nugroho, R. (2011). Policy: Policy Dynamics - Policy Analysis - Policy Management. Elex Media Komputindo.
  22. Pribadi, U., & Kim, H.-J. (2022). Impacts of cultural behavior of civil servants on citizens’ satisfaction: A survey on licensing services of Indonesian local government agencies. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2662
  23. Purwanto, E. A. (2018). Smart city as an upshot of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(3), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018070103
  24. Sattar, A., Mehmood, T., Malik, W. S., & Subhan, Q. A. (2013). Patenting, licensing, trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth: A panel data analysis of middle and low income countries. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18(5), 475–484. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84885059192&partnerID=40&md5=f9e829466b3a5a15cf3ae8b22e14ea74
  25. Serano, F. A. (2012). An Institution Be Dimension of New Economic Policy. New Harbunger Publication.
  26. Setiany, E. (2021). The Effect of Investment, Free Cash Flow, Earnings Management, and Interest Coverage Ratio on Financial Distress ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT.
  27. Sukwadi, R., & Caesar, A. (2022). An integrated approach for supply chain risk management. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0004
  28. Sumarto, S. (2021). E-Government’s Effect On Corruption Reduction In Indonesian Local Government Bureaucracy: A Case Study In Central Java. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–12. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85116024860&partnerID=40&md5=40a8b37797e673d3184824298825118e
  29. Xue, L., Mithas, S., & Ray, G. (2021). Commitment to it investment plans: The interplay of real earnings, management, it decentralization, and corporate governance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 45(1), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/14970
  30. Zauhar, S., Khairul Muluk, M. R., & Setyowati, E. (2020). Analysis of personnel patterns in the regional government of the east java province, indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 204–218. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098713463&partnerID=40&md5=b9d4705dfdf7fb3e9e12b4e7b4f82a41