Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 77 Download : 58

Main Article Content

Abstract

The implementation of the TAPERA policy, an Indonesian government initiative designed to improve access to affordable housing through mandatory savings, has generated significant public debate, particularly on social media platforms like Twitter. This research analyzes public sentiment towards TAPERA on Twitter, focusing on the reactions and concerns of the community in response to the policy. Utilizing sentiment analysis and thematic analysis of tweets, this study identifies predominant negative sentiment and critical issues such as financial burden, transparency, and policy effectiveness. The findings reveal widespread dissatisfaction with the contribution requirements, organized public protests, and the influential role of social media in shaping public discourse. The results underscore the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives into policy development to enhance legitimacy and effectiveness. The research highlights the need for more inclusive and adaptive public participation strategies in the policy-making process. These insights contribute to the broader understanding of public participation theory and its application in digital contexts.

Keywords

TAPERA Policy Public Sentiment Analysis Social Media Discourse Public Participation Theory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rulandari, N. (2024). Public Participation in Policy Making: Sentiment Analysis of TAPERA Policy on Twitter. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 754-768. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i3.1296

References

  1. Abas, A., Arifin, K., Ali, M. A. M., & Khairil, M. (2023). A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development, 46, 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853
  2. Agus, F., Fanny, S., & Muliana, R. (2020). Efektivitas Implementasi Program Perumahan Bersubsidi Bagi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah Kota Pekanbaru (Studi Kasus : Kecamatan Tenayan Raya). JURNAL SAINTIS, 20(02), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.25299/saintis.2020.vol20(02).5710
  3. Akbar, J. H., Yusriyadi, Y., & Priyatna, S. (2024). Legal politics of public housing savings for citizens’ decent and affordable housing. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 6(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv6i1p2
  4. Asril, A. A., Rifai, A., & Shebubakar, A. N. (2022). Penyelenggaraan Tabungan Perumahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Ditinjau dari Perspektif Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v7i1.1185
  5. Assamoi, B., & Lawryshyn, Y. (2012). The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion. Waste Management, 32(5), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.023
  6. Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
  7. Chan, Y. E., Krishnamurthy, R., Mann, J., & Sabherwal, R. (2022). Public Participation in Policy Making: Evidence from a Citizen Advisory Panel. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(6), 1308–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062398
  8. Chen, L., & Gao, M. (2021). Novel information interaction rule for municipal household waste classification behavior based on an evolving scale-free network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105445
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e
  10. Cui, J., & Ronald, R. (2024). Intergenerational Support and the Financial Strategies of Young Homebuyers in Shanghai. Housing, Theory and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2024.2377214
  11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). New York, NY, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research/book242504
  12. Gofur, R., & Jumiati, I. E. (2021). Analisis Kebijakan Program Sejuta Rumah: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Dan Pembangunan, 12(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v12i2.230
  13. Goodall, Z., Stone, W., & Cook, K. (2023). Housing policy and non-commercial shared housing in the private rental sector: a scoping review. Housing Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2238633
  14. Hasan, M. A., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., & Aldosary, A. S. (2018). Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.001
  15. Hayes, L. C. (2024). Research, market, and policy implications of permanently affordable housing: lessons from Australian discussions about community land trusts. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2024.2367830
  16. Ishak, M. N. (2024). Analysis Of Public Housing Savings Policy From The Perspective Of Islamic Economics: Social Welfare And Distribution Justic. Al-Kharaj, 6(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v6i2.5178
  17. Lappeman, J., Goder, A., Naicker, K., Faruki, H., & Gordon, P. (2024). Using Sentiment Analysis to Understand Public Policy Nicknames: Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 36(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2023.2178588
  18. Liu, L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2020). Public participation in decision making, perceived procedural fairness and public acceptability of renewable energy projects. Energy and Climate Change, 1, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100013
  19. Mangeswuri, D. R. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Fasilitas Likuiditas Pembiayaan Perumahan (FLPP) Terhadap Angka Backlog. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 7(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v7i1.410
  20. Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044
  21. Perlaviciute, G., & Squintani, L. (2020). Public Participation in Climate Policy Making: Toward Reconciling Public Preferences and Legal Frameworks. One Earth, 2(4), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.009
  22. Putra, H. G., Fahmi, E., & Taruc, K. (2020). Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat (TAPERA) dan Penerapannya di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 3(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v3i2.5630
  23. S, N., Paulraj, D., Ezhumalai, P., & Prakash, M. (2024). A Deep Learning Modified Neural Network(DLMNN) based proficient sentiment analysis technique on Twitter data. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 36(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2022.2093405
  24. Saputra, R., & Hasan, F. N. (2024). Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Program Makan Siang & Susu Gratis Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Bayes. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 6(3), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v6i3.1378
  25. Soeprapto, D. D. (2020). SWOT analysis of BP. Tapera: A public housing savings implementing agency in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(6), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i6.900
  26. Tania, N., Novienco, J., & Sanjaya, D. (2021). Kajian Teori Hukum Progresif Terhadap Implementasi Produk Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat. Perspektif, 26(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v26i2.800
  27. Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
  28. Wang, R., Wan, X., & Zhao, X. (2023). Understanding evolutionary process of public participation leveraging agent-based simulation: The case of waste incineration power projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118595
  29. Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhao, Y., & Li, C. (2023). A public participation approach in the environmental governance of industrial parks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101, 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107131
  30. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(5), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E
  31. Yin, R. K. (2012). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23279888
  32. Yutika, C. H., Adiwijaya, A., & Faraby, S. Al. (2021). Analisis Sentimen Berbasis Aspek pada Review Female Daily Menggunakan TF-IDF dan Naïve Bayes. JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, 5(2), 422. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i2.2845