Executive Compensation from Deontological and Utilitarian Ethics: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2177Keywords:
corporate governance, deontological ethics, executive compensation, moral responsibility, utilitarian ethicsAbstract
This study examines executive compensation within ethical frameworks, particularly deontological and utilitarian ethics, through a focused literature review of ten peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2020 and 2025. The research aims to explore how ethical principles shape executive compensation policies in promoting fairness, transparency, accountability, and social responsibility within corporate governance systems. The selected articles were qualitatively analyzed to identify dominant ethical perspectives and recurring themes related to executive remuneration, without claiming a fully systematic review procedure due to the limited number of studies and the absence of a detailed search and screening protocol. The findings indicate that a majority of the reviewed studies explicitly address the ethical dimensions of executive compensation, reflecting increasing scholarly attention to the alignment between financial incentives and moral responsibilities. From a deontological perspective, executive compensation should be grounded in principles of duty, justice, and respect for stakeholder rights, independent of performance outcomes. In contrast, utilitarian ethics assess compensation practices based on their capacity to maximize collective benefits, including organizational performance, employee welfare, and broader social value. The analysis further demonstrates that these two ethical frameworks can be integratively applied to develop a balanced compensation system that simultaneously emphasizes performance-based rewards and ethical accountability. Moreover, the literature highlights that unethical compensation practices may lead to stakeholder dissatisfaction, reputational risks, and internal organizational conflict. Therefore, embedding ethical considerations into executive compensation structures is essential for fostering responsible leadership, strengthening corporate integrity, reducing inequality, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of corporate governance practices.
References
Berutu, B. R. (2023). Ketidakpastian dan Etika dalam Keputusan Moral Perspektif Filosofis terhadap Dilema Etis Kontemporer. Literacy NotesBerutu, 1(2), 1–8.
Edmans, A., Gosling, T., & Jenter, D. (2023). CEO compensation: Evidence from the field. In Finance Working Paper (Number 771/2021). European Corporate Governance Institute.
Esvanti, M., Nafisah, A. F., & Winarno, A. (2024). Integration of Philosophical Values in Human Relations Management: Systematic Literature Review. Economics and Business Journal, 3(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.47353/ecbis.v3i2.162
Hamdani, D., Hidayat, U., & Nurwati, U. (2023). Sistem Informasi Eksekutif pada Manajamen Koperasi Bidang Keanggotaan BT - Modernisasi Koperasi Peluang dan Tantangan (Vol. 1, Number 1, pp. 61–78).
Harbani, P. (2023). Teori Pengmbilan Keputusan. Alfabeta.
Hasyim, & Bakri, M. (2024). Pay and incentive inequality: A systematic review of their effects on work motivation. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(1), 1–11.
Hazan, H., Ramadhani, R., & Mutmainnah, M. (2025). Konsep Dasar Etika. Journal PSosial, Humaniora, Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 4(2), 55–62.
Junaedi, F., Sukmono, F. G., Kencana, A. P. S., Sari, S. S., Rasyid, H. A. N., Sudiwijaya, E., & Muktaf, Z. M. (2022). Dinamika Periklanan di Era Digital (Number 204). Dua Lima Grafika.
Kingsley, J. (2024). Executive pay vs. employee wages: The ethics of income inequality in corporations.
Klaver, R. (2024). The relationship between CEO compensation and firm performance and the role of economic crises.
LaViers, L., Sandvik, J., & Xu, D. (2022). CEO pay ratio voluntary disclosures and stakeholder reactions. SSRN.
Liu, W. S. K. (2025). Global Leadership Dynamics: Refining Executive Selection in Multinational Corporations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(2), 6687–6731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01794-3
Mabaso, C., & Mdluli, P. (2025). Employee perceptions of executive compensation transparency. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 51. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v51i0.2302
Madanchian, M., Taherdoost, H., Vincenti, M., & Mohamed, N. (2024). Transforming Leadership Practices through Artificial Intelligence. Procedia Computer Science, 235(2023), 2101–2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.199
Markasović, D., Podrug, N., & Fredotović, A. A. (2024). Global Leading and Competencies of Global Leaders. Naše Gospodarstvo/Our Economy Journal, 70(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2024-0005
Megías, A., de Sousa, L., & Jiménez-Sánchez, F. (2023). Deontological and Consequentialist Ethics and Attitudes Towards Corruption: A Survey Data Analysis BT - Social Indicators Research (Vol. 170, Number 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03199-2
Nathanson, S. (2023). Act and Rule Utilitarianism. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nopiyani, P. E., & Indiani, P. R. (2023). Pengaruh Sikap Keuangan, Perilaku Keuangan, dan Literasi Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan UMKM pada Pemdes Ambengan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetif, 6(3), 411–418.
Oktryani, S., Desma, Z., & Lestari, M. A. (2025). Pentingnya Etika Profesi Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Etis Auditor. Journal of Management and Innovation Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 2081–2089. https://doi.org/10.70248/jmie.v2i3.2173
Rahman, A., & Rifqi, F. (2023). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham dalam Perspektif Etika dan Filsafat Manusia. Journal of Society and Development, 3(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.57032/jsd.v4i1.207
Rorah, I. R. C., Mangundap, J. M., & Loho, A. M. (2023). Etika Deontologi sebagai Model dalam Penerapannya pada Profesi Keperawatan. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(3), 2625–2634. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v4i3.555
Santoso, A. (2023). Perbandingan Perspektif Etika Utilitarianisme dan Deontologi dalam Konteks Pengembangan Kebijakan Publik. Literacy Notes, 1(2), 1–10.
Schiuma, G., Santarsiero, F., Carlucci, D., & Jarrar, Y. (2024). Transformative leadership competencies for organizational digital transformation. Business Horizons, 67(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.004
Silalahi, E. E. (2023). Buku Ajar Kepemimpinan : Teori Dasar Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi. PT. Pena Persada Kerta Utama.
Sipahelut, G. A. H., & Ratnawati, T. (2023). Audit Kepatuhan 2 Menilaian Kontrol Internal dalam Studi Literatur. JREA : JURNAL RISET EKONOMI DAN AKUNTANSI, 1(3), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.54066/jrea-itb.v1i2.619
Susilowati, W., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2024). Analysis of the Application of Business Ethics Theory in the Case of Bribery Acceptance By the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK RI) in 2023. International Journal of Management Research and Economics, 3(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.54066/ijmre-itb.v3i1.2552
Tsardosslapito, Iskandar, B., Romla, & Dina, N. (2025). Tinjauan Teoritis Etika Bisnis terhadap Nilai-Nilai Korporat Universitas Pertiwi dalam Perspektif Deontologi, Utilitarianisme, dan Etika Kebijakan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4), 3440–3528.
Ulya, D., Ni’mah, F., & Sarpini. (2024). Teori Etika dan Penerapan Etika Bisnis di Lembaga Keuangan Berbasis Syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 1(2), 14–31.
Yahaya, O. A. (2025). CEO pay and firm performance. Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 85–125. https://doi.org/10.14038/jbm.v9i5.85
Zuhri, A., & Ratnasari, M. (2021). Anti-corruption disclosure and audit quality on earnings management BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Challenges: Business Transformation and Circular Economy (ICECH 2021). In Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (Vol. 196, pp. 211–226). Atlantis Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christine Gianina Sulistio, Andhita Rosy Febrina, Khusnul Prasetyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
