An Overview of Open Relationship Behaviors among Homosexual (Gay) Individuals Using Online Dating Applications

Authors

  • Henry Franco Eduard Tobe Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Ratriana Yuliastuti Endang Kusumiati Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2104

Keywords:

dating apps, homosexual, intimacy, open relationship, phenomenology

Abstract

This study aims to explore the behavioral dynamics of open relationships among homosexual (gay) individuals who use online dating applications, focusing on subjective experiences derived from a small-scale qualitative inquiry. The study is motivated by the increasing use of digital platforms within the gay community, which may facilitate more flexible and non-monogamous relational arrangements. A qualitative method with a phenomenological approach was employed to examine lived experiences in depth. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with two participants who are engaged in open relationships and actively use dating applications. The findings, based on inductive thematic analysis of participants’ narratives, indicate that open relationships are not merely understood as expressions of sexual freedom, but as ongoing processes of negotiating emotional needs, intimacy, and personal autonomy. Seven recurrent themes consent, self-awareness, communication, honesty, boundaries, trust, and negotiated forms of fidelity and commitment emerged as key features within participants’ accounts. These themes were developed inductively while being interpreted in relation to existing theoretical perspectives on consensual non-monogamy. Within this limited empirical context, open relationships reflect an alternative construction of fidelity grounded in transparency and emotional responsibility, particularly in tension with dominant cultural norms that privilege monogamy. Given the study’s reliance on two participants, the findings are not intended for generalization but instead provide context-bound insights into individual meaning-making processes. The study contributes to social psychological discourse by offering a phenomenologically grounded account of emotional ethics in non-monogamous relationships and highlights implications for culturally sensitive counseling practices for LGBTQ+ clients in Indonesia.

References

Anderson, E., McCormack, M., & Ripley, M. (2025). Negotiating intimacy and consent in consensual non-monogamous relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 54(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02891-5

Arter, C., & Bunge, A. (2024). Communication, consent, and relationship satisfaction in open and non-monogamous partnerships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 50(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2023.2278149

Balzarini, R. N., Dharma, C., Kohut, T., & Campbell, L. (2023). Comparing relationship quality across monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(6), 1805–1826. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221149894

Boonchutima, S., Sriwattana, S., Rungvimolsin, R., & Palahan, N. (2016). Gays dating applications: Information disclosure and sexual behavior. Journal of Health Research, 30(4), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.14456/jhr.2016.32

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books.

Brown, J. (2014). Couple therapy for gay men: Exploring sexually open and closed relationships through the lenses of hetero-normative masculinity and attachment style. Journal of Family Therapy, 37(3), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12053

Communication, P. S. (2024). Sexual communication and relational outcomes in consensual non-monogamous relationships. Journal of Sexual Research, 61(5), 612–625.

Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2023). The fewer the merrier? Assessing stigma and well-being in CNM relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101515

Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Ziegler, A., & Karathanasis, C. (2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(6), 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02712.x

Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2022). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100476.

Fairbrother, N., Hart, T. A., & Fairbrother, M. (2022). Ethical negotiation and emotional labor in consensual non-monogamy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(4), 1678–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00657-4

Fierman, D. M., & Poulsen, S. S. (2014). Open relationships: A culturally and clinically sensitive approach. In AFTA SpringerBriefs in Family Therapy (pp. 151–161). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03248-1_16

Flicker, S. M., Vencill, J. A., & Brewster, M. E. (2021). Identity affirmation and consensual non-monogamy among sexual minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 8(4), 438–449.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide from the country’s foremost relationship expert. Harmony Books.

Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, L. (2022). Around consensual non-monogamy: Perceived satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211030393

Gupta, K. (2024). Motivations and well-being in consensual non-monogamy: A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231203456

Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., & Hughes, S. D. (2018). Queer Intimacies: A new paradigm for the study of relationship diversity. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(4–5), 556–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1531281

Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., & Hughes, S. D. (2022). Queer intimacies and relationship diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032921-050142

Killeen, P. R. (2022). Theoretical models of consensual non-monogamy: Boundaries, autonomy, and commitment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 14(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12546

Kim, J., & Balzarini, R. N. (2023). Self-awareness and emotional regulation in consensual non-monogamous relationships. Personal Relationships, 30(4), 812–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12441

Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Relationship quality of gay men in closed or open relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v12n02_06

Lehmiller, J. J., Rodriguez, N. I., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2021). Motivations for consensual non-monogamy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 1811–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01822-3

Mogilski, J. K., Memering, S. L., Welling, L. L. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2021). Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01838-9

Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2021). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage in CNM. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(3), 712–736.

Perel, E. (2017). The state of affairs: Rethinking infidelity. HarperCollins.

Populix. (2024). 63% Generasi Muda Merupakan Pengguna Aplikasi Kencan Online.

Rodrigues, D. L., Lopes, D., & Pereira, M. (2024). Commitment, trust, and satisfaction in consensually non-monogamous relationships. Personal Relationships, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12487

Rodrigues, M., & Franco, M. (2023). Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Qualitative Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054510

Rogers, C. R. (1959). A Theory of Therapy, Personality, and Interpersonal Relationships: As Developed in the Client-Centered Framework (Vol. 3, Number 1). McGraw-Hill.

Rubel, A. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2023). Consensual non-monogamy and relationship functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231169634

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4

Schechinger, H. A., Sakaluk, J. K., & Moors, A. C. (2020). Harm reduction in consensual non-monogamy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01570-4

Singh, A., Rasania, S. K., & Barua, K. (2022). Inventory Control: Its Principles and Application. Indian Journal of Community Health, 34(1), 14–19.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119

Taormino, T. (2008). Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. Cleis Press.

Torres, J. A., Powell, D. J., & Beattie, T. S. (2024). Consent, communication, and trust in polyamorous relationships. Sexualities, 27(1–2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231198654

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

How to Cite

Tobe, H. F. E., & Kusumiati, R. Y. E. (2026). An Overview of Open Relationship Behaviors among Homosexual (Gay) Individuals Using Online Dating Applications. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 7(3), 910–917. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i3.2104

Issue

Section

Articles