Regulating Fintech Abuse in Illegal Online Lending: A Criminal Law and Policy Approach

Authors

  • Vivi Sylvia Purborini Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
  • Joice Soraya Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i2.2065

Keywords:

fintech regulation, illegal online lending, criminal law, legal policy, consumer protection

Abstract

The rapid expansion of financial technology (fintech) has transformed digital financial services, particularly in the online lending sector. However, this growth has been accompanied by the proliferation of illegal online lending platforms operating outside formal regulatory frameworks. These platforms often engage in abusive practices, including excessive interest rates, coercive debt collection, misuse of personal data, intimidation, and other forms of cyber-enabled economic crime. This article examines the regulatory and criminal law frameworks governing fintech-related abuses in illegal online lending in Indonesia, focusing on their coherence and limitations. Using a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes statutory regulations, policy instruments, and legal doctrines related to fintech regulation, consumer protection, cybercrime, and criminal liability. The findings reveal that, despite the existence of multiple regulatory and penal mechanisms, the legal framework remains fragmented and institutionally dispersed. Key challenges include overlapping regulatory mandates, weak coordination among supervisory and law enforcement bodies such as the Financial Services Authority (OJK), the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, and criminal justice institutions and the increasingly transnational nature of digital financial crimes. This article proposes normative recommendations to enhance regulatory coherence, particularly through integrated regulatory supervision. This approach emphasizes structured coordination among relevant authorities, clearer division of institutional responsibilities, shared enforcement mechanisms, and harmonized regulatory standards. By clarifying structural and doctrinal gaps, this study contributes to strengthening consumer protection and improving legal certainty within Indonesia’s fintech ecosystem.

References

Afriana, A., & Lestari, R. (2021). Consumer protection in fintech lending. Yuridika, 36(2), 345–362.

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and financial regulation. Northwestern JILB. 37(3), 371–413.

Atmasasmita, R. (2021). Restorative justice reform. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(1), 1–21.

Braithwaite, J. (2018). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Regulation & Governance, 12(3), 371–385.

Cruz, R. (2021). Digital lending risks in Southeast Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 35(4), 401–420.

Europol. (2022). Internet organized crime threat assessment.

Gomber, P. (2018). Fintech revolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220-265.

Gunningham, N. (2019). Smart regulation theory. Law & Policy, 41(1).

Komnas HAM. (2022). Human rights and online lending.

Low, K., & Teo, E. (2020). Regulating fintech in Singapore. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2020(1), 34–57.

Lubis, T. (2020). Digital consumer exploitation. Jurnal Hukum & Teknologi, 1(2).

Makarim, E. (2021). Cyber law and fintech risks. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3).

Marshall, T. (2019). Restorative justice theory. Oxford Journal of Criminology, 59(4).

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Kencana.

Muladi, & Priyanto. (2018). Corporate criminal liability. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 14(2).

Nguyen, T. (2022). Illegal fintech in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(1).

OJK. (2024). Indonesian fintech lending statistics 2024. Financial Services Authority.

Prasetyo, T. (2020). Cybercrime enforcement. Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 9(1).

Prayogo, S., & Suryani, T. (2021). Online lending victims. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3).

PwC Indonesia. (2025). New Criminal Code.

Rahardjo, S. (2022). Cyber victimology. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 10(2).

Rahman, F. (2023). Psychological impacts of fintech debt. Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2).

Santoso, T. (2020). Cyber economic crime. Indonesia Law Review, 10(2).

Satgas Waspada Investasi. (2023). National illegal fintech report.

Scholten, K. (2020). Cross-border cyber enforcement. European Journal of Crime Policy, 26(4).

Suryono, R. (2023). Data exploitation in fintech. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(2).

Sutedi, A. (2019). Financial regulation law. Jurnal Regulasi Keuangan, 5(1).

UNODC. (2021). Cybercrime and fintech.

World Bank. (2020). Consumer protection and fintech.

Zetzsche, D. (2017). Fintech regulation in the EU. Journal of Financial Regulation, 3(1).

Zhang, W. (2021). China’s P2P crackdown. China Law Review, 19(3).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Purborini, V. S., & Soraya, J. (2026). Regulating Fintech Abuse in Illegal Online Lending: A Criminal Law and Policy Approach. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i2.2065

Issue

Section

Articles