Geopolitical Influences in Indonesia’s Nickel Industry

Authors

  • Ainul Mutmainnah Mulyono Universitas Padjadjaran
  • R. Dudy Heryadi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Akim Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i4.1843

Keywords:

Geopolitics, Nickel, Indonesia, Electric Vehicle Batteries, Hedging Strategy

Abstract

This study analyzes Indonesia's strategic role in the global nickel industry and its implications for geopolitical dynamics, particularly in the context of the rivalry between the United States and China in the electric vehicle battery sector. Despite its possession of the world's largest nickel reserves, Indonesia faces considerable challenges due to domestic policies, including the prohibition of nickel ore exports and the preponderance of Chinese investment. The enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has further exacerbated the already complex situation in Indonesia by imposing restrictions on subsidies for battery materials, thereby limiting their availability to those sourced exclusively from official U.S. trading partners. This research utilizes a qualitative approach and a literature study to reveal that the Republic of Indonesia is currently confronted with a complex geopolitical dilemma. It is imperative to implement a hedging strategy to ensure the maintenance of balanced relations with both major powers while concurrently expanding strategic partnerships with other nations. The findings offer policy insights that could be used to strengthen Indonesia's role in the global clean energy supply chain.

References

Agung, M., & Adi, E. A. W. (2022). Peningkatan Investasi Dan Hilirisasi Nikel Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 6(2), 4009–4020. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i2.3085

Al Amin. (2025). Sino-Indian rivalry in Indo-Pacific and Bangladesh’s geo-strategic hedging in response to its security threats. Discover Global Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00144-1

Ali, M. I., Rahaman, M. A., Ali, M. J., & Rahman, M. F. (2025). The growth–environment nexus amid geopolitical risks: cointegration and machine learning algorithm approaches. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00872-z

Bakry, U. S. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hubungan Internasional (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Barizi, M. H., & Triarda, R. (2023). Rantai Pasokan Global Dan Nasionalisme Sumber Daya Alam: Kajian Terkait Hilirisasi Nikel Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 312–338. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i2.466

Camba, A. (2021). The unintended consequences of national regulations: Large-scale-small-scale relations in Philippine and Indonesian nickel mining. Resources Policy, 74(August), 102–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102213

Dogan, E., Majeed, M. T., & Luni, T. (2021). Analyzing the impacts of geopolitical risk and economic uncertainty on natural resources rents. Resources Policy, 72(January), 102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102056

Indonesia Investment Authority. (2025). Supporting Nickel Downstream Industry in Indonesia, Danantara Indonesia and INA Announce Strategic Partnership with Eramet. Indonesia Investment Authority. https://www.ina.go.id/press-release/supporting-nickel-downstream-industry-in-indonesia-danantara-indonesia-and-ina-announce-strategic-partnership-with-eramet?file=en

Khalil, S. B., & Broughel, A. (2025). Stainless success, battery lag: Evaluation of Indonesia’s resource nationalism in nickel. The Extractive Industries and Society, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101677

Kusumadewi, H., & Wiswayana, W. M. (2024). Multilevel Hedging for Middle-Regional Power: Indonesia Ascent Toward Powerhood Through Hedging. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v8i2.591

Lamont, C. (2015). Research Methods in International Relations (N. Aguilera, Ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

Lin, B., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Geopolitics of renewable energy development: The role of energy metals. Energy Policy, 198(July 2024), 114482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114482

Lu, C. (2024, August 8). Can Indonesia’s Nickel Industry Break Free from China’s Grip? Foreign Policy Analysis. https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/08/08/indonesia-nickel-china-us-critical-mineral-inflation-reduction-act/

Marwanto, Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., & Putri, M. (2024). Business on Nickel Down Streaming with China and European Union Lawsuits at World Trade Organization. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1381

Mubah, A. S. (2019). Indonesia’s Double Hedging Strategy toward the United States-China Competition: Shaping Regional Order in the Indo-Pacific? Issues and Studies, 55(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013251119400071

Müller, M. (2023). The ‘new geopolitics’ of mineral supply chains: A window of opportunity for African countries. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2226108

Nadhif, A., & Suryadipura, D. (2023). Indonesia’s Commercial Diplomacy towards South Korea in Efforts to Realize EV Battery Project Investment Diplomasi Komersial Indonesia terhadap Korea Selatan dalam Upaya Realisasi Investasi Proyek Baterai EV. International Journal, 17(1), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.20473/JGS.17.1.2023.215-238

Noussan, M., Raimondi, P. P., Scita, R., & Hafner, M. (2021). The role of green and blue hydrogen in the energy transition—a technological and geopolitical perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010298

Obaidullah, M., & Howlader, M. R. (2025). Assessing geopolitical and socio-economic consequences of India-Bangladesh water disputes. Discover Global Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00137-0

Oliveira, G. de L. T., Murton, G., Rippa, A., Harlan, T., & Yang, Y. (2020). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Views from the ground. Political Geography, 82(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102225

Palle, A. (2021). Bringing geopolitics to energy transition research. Energy Research and Social Science, 81(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102233

Pandyaswargo, A. H., Wibowo, A. D., Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Rezqita, A., & Onoda, H. (2021). The emerging electric vehicle and battery industry in Indonesia: Actions around the nickel ore export ban and a SWOT analysis. Batteries, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries7040080

Petrović, P., & Ostojić, I. (2025). Effects of policy induced uncertainty and geopolitical risk on renewable energy production: Econometric analysis. Renewable Energy, 255(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123783

Qaseem, F. I. (2023). The Analysis of Indonesia’s Nickel Export Affecting the Dynamic of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows in Indonesia: Multiple Regression Analysis. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(10), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i10.018

Radhica, D. D., & Wibisana, R. A. (2023). Proteksionisme Nikel Indonesia dalam Perdagangan Dunia. Cendekia Niaga Journal of Trade Development and Studies, 7(1), 74–84. https://jurnal.kemendag.go.id/index.php/JCN/article/view/821

Rakhmat, M. Z. (2025, April 8). U.S. Tariff War Could Deepen Indonesia’s Ties with China—But Jakarta Holds the Keys. Global South Project. https://chinaglobalsouth.com/analysis/u-s-tariff-war-could-deepen-indonesias-ties-with-china-but-jakarta-holds-the-keys/

Reinpal, F., Almubaraq, H. Z., & Lelyana, N. (2023). Nickel Ban and Indonesia’s Defense: A WTO Dispute with Implications for National Security. JournaJournal of International Trade, Logistics and LawlofInter, 9(2), 1–9. https://doaj.org/article/4ab7669b7669468298263f2f48f0b861

Rosmayanti. (2023, August 22). Hilirisasi Nikel Indonesia dalam Rivalitas Ekonomi dan Geopolitik antara AS dan China. Warta Ekonomi. https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read511517/hilirisasi-nikel-indonesia-dalam-rivalitas-ekonomi-dan-geopolitik-antara-as-dan-china?page=2

Saadaoui, J., Smyth, R., & Vespignani, J. (2025). Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals. Energy Economics, 142(January), 108195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108195

Santoso, R. B., Moenardy, D. F., Muttaqin, R., & Saputera, D. (2023). Pilihan Rasional Indonesia dalam Kebijakan Larangan Ekspor Bijih Nikel. Indonesian Perspective, 8(1), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v8i1.56383

Setiani, H., Valennia, R., & Rusni, N. K. (2024). Nickel export ban policy in Indonesia - a path to sustainable economic development? EcoProfit: Sustainable and Environment Business, 1(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.61511/ecoprofit.v1i2.2024.468

Singgih, V. (2024, January 29). Setumpuk masalah di balik investasi China - “Demam nikel membuat pemerintah kehilangan akal sehat.” BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cw4m1k0j7vro

Smith, D. C. (2023). Geopolitical realities of the energy transition supply chain: energy security risks and opportunities. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 41(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2023.2230732

Ursache, A. (2023). Critical Materials Raw as Leverage in Global Geopolitics. SCIENTIA MORALITAS - International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431662

US Embassy Jakarta. (2023). Joint Statement of the Leaders of the United States and the Republic of Indonesia: Elevating Relations to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. U.S Embassy & Consulates in Indonesia. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/en/read/5499/siaran_pers/joint-statement-of-the-leaders-of-the-united-states-and-the-republic-of-indonesia-elevating-relations-to-a-comprehensive-strategic-partnership

Wang, B., Wang, L., Zhong, S., Xiang, N., & Qu, Q. (2023). Assessing the supply risk of geopolitics on critical minerals for energy storage technology in China. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10(January), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1032000

Webb, S., & Webb, B. (2010). Methods of Social Study. Cambridge University Press.

Wijaya, T., & Jones, L. (2025a). Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War. Third World Quarterly, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2465514

Wijaya, T., & Jones, L. (2025b). Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War. Third World Quarterly, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2465514

Wijaya, T., & Jones, L. (2025c). Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War. Third World Quarterly, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2465514

Winanti, P. S., & Diprose, R. (2020). Reordering the extractive political settlement: Resource nationalism, domestic ownership and transnational bargains in Indonesia. Extractive Industries and Society, 7(4), 1534–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.08.015

Yuniarto, B., Nurani, R., Apriyono, Rahmawati, R., & Nurfadilah, N. (2024). The Role of Geopolitics on Economic Growth in Indonesia. American Journal of Open Research, 3(9), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.59066/ijoms.v2i1.325

Downloads

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Mulyono, A. M., R. Dudy Heryadi, & Akim. (2025). Geopolitical Influences in Indonesia’s Nickel Industry. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(4), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i4.1843