Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 11 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

Relations between inter-Korean have worsened as tensions from the DPRK nuclear crisis have continued to escalate. Amidst the existing tensions, some of the Republic of Korea regimes have taken a humanist approach in dealing with the DPRK, which has resulted in improving relations between both countries. The author uses Samuel P. Huntington's political order theory to explore a stable and effective political system in managing conflict and making decisions. This study uses qualitative methods with secondary sources from journals, books, reports, official documents, and official websites. The results of this study indicate that the humanist approach is more effective in dealing with the DPRK through meetings held by the leaders of the two countries to build cooperative relations such as the construction of the Kaesong Industrial Complex, economic aid worth hundreds of billions of Won to prevent North Korea's nuclear development, and dialogue conducted through state meetings. In addition, policies made by the Republic of Korea, such as the Sunshine Policy, are able to embrace the DPRK and prioritize dialogue when the DPRK violates the agreement in cooperation without unilaterally terminating the cooperative relationship as was done by the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye regimes with their conservative approaches. Political institutions also play an important role in making foreign policies that have an impact on the security stability of the Republic of Korea.

Keywords

DPRK Humanist Approach Nuclear Issue Republic of Korea

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sopia, S., Djumala, D., & Sudirman, A. (2025). The Role of The Humanist Approach to Inter-Korean Diplomatic Relations During the DPRK’s Nuclear Crisis . Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(3), 897-909. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i3.1716

References

  1. Abe, N. (2020). The NPT at Fifty: Successes and Failures. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 3(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1824500
  2. Alobaidi, W. M., & Sandgren, E. (2021). An Interactive Evolutionary Environment for Creative Design. Modern Mechanical Engineering, 11(02), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.4236/mme.2021.112003
  3. Anastasia, N. U., & Yuniasih, T. (2020). Strategi Nuclear Deterrence Korea Utara Terkait Perkembangan Militer Di Kawasan Asia Timur Pada Tahun 2018-2020. Balcony, 4(2), 147–160. https://jom.fisip.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/balcony/article/view/227
  4. Anindita, V. (2020a). Implementasi Kebijakan Sunshine Policy Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Korea Selatan Dalam Proses Reunifikasi Dengan Korea Utara Pada Masa Kepemimpinan Kim Dae Jung Tahun 1998 – 2002. Global and Policy Journal of International Relations, 5(01), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.33005/jgp.v5i01.1904
  5. Anindita, V. (2020b). Implementasi Kebijakan Sunshine Policy Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Korea Selatan dalam Proses Reunifikasi dengan Korea Utara Pada Masa Kepemimpinan Kim Dae Jung Tahun 1998 – 2002. Global and Policy Journal of International Relations, 5(01). https://doi.org/10.33005/jgp.v5i01.1904
  6. Anne, I., Michael, E., & Braimah, O. (2020). The Role of Political Institutions in Economic Growth and Development of Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-4-17
  7. ANTARA. (2013). Korea Selatan tingkatkan dana bantuan untuk Korea Utara. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/351348/korea-selatan-tingkatkan-dana-bantuan-untuk-korea-utara
  8. Ardiyanti, D. (2024). North Korea ’ s Nuclear Threat : A Case Study of the Security Dilemma in. ESOLUSI Jurnal Sosial Politik, 07(02), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.32699/resolusi.v7i2.7280
  9. Avelino, F. (2021). Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. Journal of Political Power, 14(3), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1875307
  10. Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir. (2012). Ketegangan di Semenanjung Korea, Nuklir mengancam Asia. https://bapeten.go.id/berita/talkshow-berita-satu--ketegangan-di-semenanjung-korea-nuklir-mengancam-asia-134720
  11. Bermudez, J. (2015). North Korea ’ s Development of a Nuclear Weapons Strategy. JSTOR.
  12. Chang-kwoun, P. (2015). Rethinking North Korea’s Denuclearization: Approaches and Strategies (Issue June).
  13. Chang, L. (2021). Separated Families in the Two Koreas: The Organizational and Political Transformations. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021), 586(Icprss), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.231
  14. Cimbala, S., & Lowther, A. (2022). Nuclear Modernization and the Sentinel Icbm. A Journal of Strategic Airpower & Spacepower, 1(2), 57–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48668555
  15. Congressional Budget Office. (2021). Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2021 to 2030. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57240
  16. Dostal, J. M. (2023). South Korea: The Lasting Pitfalls of the ‘Imperial Presidency.’ Political Quarterly, 94(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13232
  17. Farid Darussalam, M. (2020). The Influence of Domestic Politics of South Korea on its Relations with North Korea and the United States. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.48652
  18. Hahm, S. D., & Heo, U. (2020). President Moon Jae-in at Midterm: What Affects Public Support for Moon Jae-in? Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(8), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620911145
  19. Hahn, E., & Scouras, J. (2020). Responding to North Korean First Nuclear Use. Johns Hopkins.
  20. Hoseinian, T., & Yousef, J. (2013). A Study on the Cultural Differences and the Leadership Styles oin Scandinavia and South Korea. 74. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-2171
  21. Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave: Can Yugoslavia survive? Soviet reaction, Russian reform overcoming underdevelopment. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34.
  22. Hur, M. (2017). Revisiting the Cheonan sinking in the Yellow Sea. The Pacific Review, 30(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1249905
  23. International Crisis Group. (2019). The Kaesong Industrial Complex ’ s Political Rise and Fall. International Crisis Group. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep31405.5
  24. John, V, J. (2017). Korea Peninsula Peace Initiative: Prospects and Challenges of President Moon Jae-in’s North Korea Policy. https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=1896&lid=1510
  25. KAKIŞIM, C. (2017). Kuzey Kore’nin Resmi İdeolojisi Olarak Cuçe Öğretisi ve Kuzey Kore Dış Politikasına Etkileri. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 14(56), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.515816
  26. Kelly, E, R. (2019). Moon Jae-in’s foreign policy reorientation. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/moon-jae-s-foreign-policy-reorientation
  27. Khalilah Mukarramah. (2023). Sunshine Policy Di Era Moon Jae-in Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Hubungan Antar-Korea. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i1.433
  28. Kim, H. A. (2017). President Roh Moo-Hyun’s Last Interview and the Roh Moo-Hyun Phenomenon in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1260754
  29. Kim, H. K., Baik, K., & Kim, N. (2019). How Korean Leadership Style Cultivates Employees’ Creativity and Voice in Hierarchical Organizations. SAGE Open, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019876281
  30. Kim, H. Y., Park, J. H., & Kim, H. J. (2020a). South Korean humanistic leadership. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 27(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0021
  31. Kim, H. Y., Park, J. H., & Kim, H. J. (2020b). South Korean humanistic leadership. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 27(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0021
  32. Kim, K. R., & Kang, J.-S. (2013). Liberal–conservative self-identification in Korea: a cross-cultural explanation. Korean Social Science Journal, 40(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40483-013-0009-7
  33. Kim, S. Y. (2020). Kim Dae-Jung’s Leadership as Relevant to the Sunshine Policy. May.
  34. Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2022). Quality of government in the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 44(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2062400
  35. Lestari, B. U. S. (2021). Analisis Perbedaan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Korea Selatan Dibawah Kepemimpinan Park Geun Hye dan Moon Jae In Terhadap Kepemilikan Senjata Nuklir Korea …. Indonesian Journal of Global Discourse, 3(June), 81–109. http://ijgd.unram.ac.id/index.php/ijgd/article/view/32
  36. Makhroja, N, M. (2020). UNDERSTANDING JUCHE IDEOLOGY THROUGH PSYCHOLOGY OF PEACE AND CONFLICT IN NORTH KOREA. Review of International Relation, 2(1). https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/rir/article/download/15420/9196
  37. Malevich, S. H. (2020). Moonshine: How a Return to the Sunshine Policy under President Moon Jae-In will bring Stability to the Korean Peninsula. Glendon Journal of International Studies / Revue d’études Internationales de Glendon, 11(0). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/07/17/there-are-3-big-reasons-south-koreas-new-
  38. Melhem, D. (2022). Exploring Worldwide Democratic Innovations - A case study of Lebanon. European Democracy Hub, 1–12.
  39. MOFA Republic of Korea. (2022). Understanding the North Korean Nuclear Issue. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/wpge/m_5474/contents.do
  40. Moon, H. C., & Yin, W. (2020). Enhancing inter-korean economic cooperation through international cluster: Implications for the Kaesong industrial complex. Revista UNISCI, 2020(52), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-78
  41. Nadhiva, F., Dewi, A. U., & Suryadipura, D. (2019). Reorientasi Kebijakan Luar Negeri Republik Korea terhadap Republik Rakyat Demokratik Korea dalam Upaya Reunifikasi (2017-2019). Jurnal Global & Strategis, 13(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.13.2.2019.157-170
  42. Nevins, J. (2011). Huntington, Samuel P. (1927-2008). Anti-Immigration in the United States: A Historical Encyclopedia: Volume 1-2, 1, 256–257.
  43. Park, H., & Jo, W. (2025). Nuclear chess on the Korean Peninsula : analysing North Korea ’ s “ second mission ” and strategic implications Nuclear chess on the Korean Peninsula : analysing North Korea ’ s “ second mission ” and strategic implications ABSTRACT. Defense & Security Analysis, 41(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2024.2434317
  44. Park, N. (2020). South Korea Is a Liberal Country Now. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/16/south-korea-is-a-liberal-country-now/
  45. Pearl Jinju, K. (2014). The Re-Evaluation of The Sunshine Policy : Failure or Success. The Public Sphere, 2(1), 101–113. https://psj.lse.ac.uk/articles/21
  46. Pearson, J., & Park, J.-M. (2016). North Korea overcomes poverty, sanctions with cut-price nukes. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-nuclear-money/north-korea-overcomes-poverty-sanctions-with-cut-price-nukes-idUSKCN0UP1G820160111
  47. Rooks, W. (2019). Walking the byungjin line: North Korea in the Eurasian century. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/walking-the-byungjin-line-north-korea-in-the-eurasian-century/
  48. Safitri. (2017). Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Korea Selatan Terhadap Korea Utara Di Era Moon Jae in. 12–22.
  49. Schneider, M., & Ramana, M. V. (2023). Nuclear Energy and the Non-Proliferation Treaty: A Retrospective Examination. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 6(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2205572
  50. Smith, J. (2022). N.Korea spent as much as $642 million on nukes in 2021, report estimates. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/nkorea-spent-much-642-million-nukes-2021-report-estimates-2022-06-15/
  51. STRNAD, G. (2017). SOUTH KOREAN LEADERS IN THE POLITICS OF DEMOCRATIZATION. International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.14746/kr.2017.03.09
  52. Surapati, P. J., Maulidina, N. N., Agustono, F. M. P., & Pohan, H. F. (2021). Comparative Analysis of President Soeharto and Kim Dae Jung’s Policies in Overcoming the 1997 Economic Crisis based on Small Theory and Idiosyncratic Theory. Khazanah Sosial, 3(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v3i2.11503
  53. Syafiq Rizqullah, M. F., Tristofa, L., & Ramadhanti, D. F. (2021). Disaster Diplomacy of South Korea toward North Korea as Efforts to Create Peace in the Korean Peninsula (2017 – 2020). Nation State: Journal of International Studies, 4(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v4i1.359
  54. UNAIDS. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/document/2010/10_4-Intro-to-triangulation-MEF.pdf
  55. Utomo, A., & Maksum, A. (2020). The Role of Identity in the Korea Reunification Process: an Analysis. Dauliyah Journal of Islamic and International Affairs, 5(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.21111/dauliyah.v5i1.4273
  56. Walya, W. (2021). The role of political institutions – A Case study of Kenya in reference to the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Journalofcmsd, 7, 56–76.
  57. Wishanti, D. A. P. E. (2016). Kebangkitan China dalam Kerjasama Ekonomi Internasional di Kawasan Asia Timur | Transformasi Global. Jurnal Transformasi Global, 1(1), 1–21. https://transformasiglobal.ub.ac.id/index.php/trans/article/view/4
  58. World Bank. (2021). World Bank national accounts data GDP. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
  59. Wrobel, & Ralph. (2021). Kim Jong-un ’ s Byungjin Policy : Support or obstacle for economic convergence on the Korean peninsula ? Kim Jong- un ’ s Byungjin Pol icy : Support or Obstacle for Economic Conver- gence on the Korean Peninsula ? Ordnungspolitische Diskurse.
  60. Yangmo, K. U. (2019). Privatized foreign policy? Explaining the Park Geun-hye Administration’s Decision-making Process. Korea Journal, 59(1), 106–134. https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2019.59.1.106