Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 41 Download : 21

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates the enhancement of Indonesia's Open Proportional Electoral System (OPES) through a SOAR (Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, Results) analysis to strategize its implementation for the 2024 elections. Utilizing a comprehensive literature review method, the study analyzed 984 articles from Google Scholar and 1000 from Crossref, narrowing down to eight pertinent studies published within the last three years. The SOAR analysis revealed key strengths of the OPES, including increased political plurality and direct voter engagement, while identifying opportunities for reform, such as reducing campaign financing and mitigating money politics. The aspirations highlighted a desire for greater accountability and integrity in electoral processes. Results indicated that implementing measures to limit campaign expenditures and enhance transparency could significantly reduce electoral misconduct. The study recommends establishing stricter regulations on campaign financing and fostering public awareness campaigns to educate voters on their rights and the electoral process. By addressing these challenges and leveraging existing strengths, Indonesia can strengthen its democratic practices and ensure a more equitable electoral landscape in the upcoming elections. This analysis provides a structured framework for policymakers to navigate the complexities of electoral reform effectively.

 

Keywords

General Election System Open Proportional Implementation Strategy Policy Implementation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Milwan, M., Sunarya, A., & Akadira, T. (2025). Strengthening Indonesia’s Open Proportional Electoral System: A SOAR Analysis for 2024 Implementation Strategy. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 165 - 185. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i1.1528

References

  1. Adi Vibhisana, A. D., Rifqi Nugroho, M., & Muhammad Rofiulhaq, F. (2023). DI BAWAH KONTROL PUBLIK: Analisa kritis penerapan sistem proporsional terbuka maupun tertutup terhadap peluang penguatan kontrol publik pada Pemilu 2024. Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, 5(01), 24–34. https://doi. org/10. 55108/jbk. v5i01. 303
  2. Al-Hamdi, R., Sakir, S., Lailam, T., & Edward Trias Pahlevi, M. (2022). Designing Open-list Proportional Representation System in Indonesia’s Legislative Election during the Global Pandemic Era. 209(Iconpo 2021), 12–23. https://doi. org/10. 2991/aebmr. k. 220209. 003
  3. Amin, F., Swarizona, S., Kuncahyo, T., & Arafat, Y. (2023). Digital Democracy Political Participation Through Technology in the Modern Era. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(4), 291–301. https://doi. org/10. 54783/ijsoc. v5i4. 786
  4. Annisa Medina Sari. (2023). Sistem Proporsional Tertutup, Kelebihan dan Kekurangannya. Fakultas Hukum UMSU. https://fahum. umsu. ac. id/sistem-proporsional-tertutup-kelebihan-dan-kekurangan/
  5. Argawati, U. (2023). Pro-Kontra Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka. https://www. mkri. id/index. php?id=19011&page=web. Berita#
  6. Armato, M. A., Aubin, J. L., Bennion, E., Bugh, G. E., Campbell, C., Drury, J. P. M., Drury, S. A. M., Evans, H. K., Friedman, S., & Galatas, S. E. (2015). Civic Education in the Twenty-First Century: A Multidimensional Inquiry. Lexington Books. https://searchworks. stanford. edu/view/11485555
  7. Azis, J. K., & Sihombing, I. E. (2023). Perbandingan antara Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka dan Tertutup di Indonesia: Analisis menuju Penyelenggaraan yang Lebih Baik. Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti, 62–68. https://doi. org/10. 25105/ferenda. v1i2. 18277
  8. Ballard C. Campbell. (1980). Representative Democracy: Public Policy and Midwestern Legislatures in the Late Nineteenth Century. Harvard University Press. https://doi. org/10. 4159/harvard. 9780674732049
  9. Basuki, M., & Budiarto, A. (2021). Regional Potential for the Development of the Superior Industrial Sector in Musi Banyuasin Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 830(1). https://doi. org/10. 1088/1755-1315/830/1/012084
  10. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries. Kumarian Press. https://doi. org/10. 5860/choice. 40-3650
  11. Bryan, S. and Baer, D. (2005). Office of Democracy and Governance Money in Politics Handbook : a Guide To Increasing Transparency in Emerging. November.
  12. Chan, J. (2006). Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space. Edited By Muthiah Alagappa. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2004. 528 pp. $35. 95. Paper. Journal of East Asian Studies, 6(3), 463–465. https://doi. org/10. 1017/S1598240800004665
  13. Djidar, H. (2024). Universitas Andi Djemma. Penerapan sistem proporsional terbuka ditengah sistem multipartai membuat pelaksanaannya menjadi rumit dan sangat kompleks. Keruwetan dalam teknis pelaksanaan pemungutan dan penghitungan suara memunculkan berbagai macam masalah ya. 3(2), 124–135. https://ojs. unanda. ac. id/index. php/tociung/article/view/2276
  14. Fathurrahman, A. M., Pawana, S. C., & . . . (2023). Gagasan Pemisahan Pemilu Lokal dan Nasional: Evaluasi dan Dekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Serentak 2019 di Indonesia. Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu …. https://doi. org/10. 24967/vt. v6i1. 2081
  15. Fitzgerald, S. E., Telaumbanua, N., & Rasji, R. (2023). Comparison Analysis of Open and Closed Proportional Election Systems in the Perspective of State Law in Indonesia. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 1188–1196. https://doi. org/10. 57235/aurelia. v2i2. 695
  16. Höhn, S. (2013). The object of activism: documents and daily life in Namibian NGOs. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(1), 99–117. https://doi. org/10. 1111/plar. 12005
  17. Ismayanti, N. L., Muchsin, S., & Sekarsari, R. W. (2021). Upaya Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Blitar dalam Mempersiapkan Pilkada Tahun 2020 Ditengah Pandemi Covid 19. Respon Publik. http://jim. unisma. ac. id/index. php/rpp/article/view/12009
  18. Kansil, C. S. T., & Haga, C. S. L. (2023). Analisis Sistem Pemilihan Umum Proporsional Tertutup di Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 880–888. https://journal. upy. ac. id/index. php/pkn/article/view/5019
  19. Kenneth Janda, J. -Y. K. (2011). Party Systems and Country Governance (1st ed. ). Routledge. https://doi. org/https://doi. org/10. 4324/9781315633015
  20. Khairunnisa, Maulida, and S. F. (2023). Sistem Proporsional Terbuka dan Tertutup pada Pemilu di Indonesia serta Kelebihan dan Kekurangan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(1), 8. https://doi. org/https://doi. org/10. 33648/jtm. v4i1. 311
  21. KompasTV. (2023). Pemilu 2024 Tetap Terbuka, Berikut Putusan MK Tolak Sistem Proporsional Tertutup. https://www. youtube. com/watch?v=SJ4-1zecogY
  22. Kurniawan, D. (2016). Demokrasi Indonesia dalam Lintasan Sejarah Yang Nyata dan Yang Seharusnya. Mozaik: Kajian Ilmu Sejarah, 8(1). http://dx. doi. org/10. 21831/moz. v8i1. 10770
  23. Kusnandar, V. B. (2022a). Proporsi Penduduk Indonesia menurut Jenjang Pendidikan (Juni 2022). https://databoks. katadata. co. id/datapublish/2022/09/20/hanya-6-warga-indonesia-yang-berpendidikan-tinggi-pada-juni-2022
  24. Kusnandar, V. B. (2022b). Proporsi Penduduk Indonesia menurut Jenjang Pendidikan (Juni 2022).
  25. Maulidi, and zamroni. (2023). Krisis Nilai Demokrasi atas Gugatan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka ke Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Elemen Masyarakat. JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 2(2), 9. https://doi. org/https://doi. org/10. 55352/josh. v2i2. 537
  26. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman. https://cir. nii. ac. jp/crid/1130000797575263744
  27. Michael Gallagher, M. M. (1988). Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. Sage Publications. https://cir. nii. ac. jp/crid/1130000796657524608
  28. Mills, L. (2017). Parliamentary transparency and accountability. https://core. ac. uk/download/pdf/131020179. pdf
  29. Mikander, P., & Satokangas, H. (2024). Addressing Democracy and Its Threats in Education: Exploring a Pluralist Perspective in Light of Finnish Social Studies Textbooks. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 43(5), 555–571. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s11217-024-09934-7
  30. Monica Ayu Caesar Isabela. (2023). Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Tertutup dan Terbuka. Pemilu. Kompas. Com. https://pemilu. kompas. com/read/2023/01/05/19235551/kelebihan-dan-kekurangan-sistem-pemilu-proporsional-tertutup-dan-terbuka
  31. Moore, B., Geese, L., Kenny, J., Dudley, H., Jordan, A., Prados Pascual, A., Lorenzoni, I., Schaub, S., Enguer, J., & Tosun, J. (2024). Politicians and climate change: A systematic review of the literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, May, 1–17. https://doi. org/10. 1002/wcc. 908
  32. Mulya, S., & Adnan, M. F. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu 2019 Tingkat KPPS Di Kecamatan Lubuak Kilangan Kota Padang. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan …. https://ejournal. mandalanursa. org/index. php/JISIP/article/view/1698. http://dx. doi. org/10. 58258/jisip. v5i1. 1698
  33. Mustanir, A. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Dana Desa Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Di Desa Teteaji Kecamatan Tellu Limpoe Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 4(2). https://doi. org/10. 24252/profetik. v4i2a6
  34. Naval, C., Print, M., & Veldhuis, R. (2002). Education for Democratic Citizenship in the New Europe: Context and Reform. European Journal of Education, 37(2), 107–128. http://www. jstor. org/stable/1503793
  35. Pratiwi, D. A. (2018). Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Daftar Terbuka di Indonesia: Melahirkan Korupsi Politik? Jurnal Trias Politika, 2(1), 13–28. https://doi. org/10. 33373/jtp. v2i1. 1235
  36. Rahayu, M. P., Lita Tyesta, A. L. W., & Herawati, R. (2017). Sistem proporsional dalam pemilihan umum legislatif di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi. org/10. 14710/dlj. 2017. 17295
  37. Rantau, M. I. (2019). Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia: Analisis Terhadap Undang Undang No 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 19(2), 181–193. https://doi. org/10. 33592/pelita. vol19. iss2. 120
  38. Reuven Y. Hazan, G. R. (2010). Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences (Comparative Politics). Oxford University Press. https://www. amazon. com/Democracy-within-Parties-Consequences-Comparative/dp/0199572542
  39. Reynolds, A., Reily, B., & Ellis, A. (2016). Desain Sistem Pemilu: Buku Panduan Baru International IDEA. Terjemahan Noor Cholis. Jakarta: Yayasan Perludem.
  40. Richard Davis. (2001). The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. Political Science Quarterly, 116(1). https://ciaotest. cc. columbia. edu/olj/psq/psq_spr01e. html
  41. Riwanto, A. (2014). Inkompatibilitas Asas Pengaturan Sistem Pemilu dengan Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 21(4), 509–530. https://doi. org/10. 20885/iustum. vol21. iss4. art1
  42. Robert E. Mutch. (2016). Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10. 1093/wentk/9780190274696. 001. 0001
  43. Rosana, E. (2012). Partai Politik dan Pembangunan Politik. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 8(1), 135–150. http://dx. doi. org/10. 24042/tps. v8i1. 1548
  44. Sarno Maulana R. (2022). Pemilu 2024 adalah Musayawarah Besar Rakyat Indonesia untuk Memilih para Pemimpin (Bagian 1). KPU Kabupaten Ciamis. https://kab-ciamis. kpu. go. id/berita/baca/7801/pemilu-2024-adalah-musayawarah-besar-rakyat-indonesia-untuk-memilih-para-pemimpin-bagian-1# diunduh 05/10/2023.
  45. Scarrow, S. E. (2005). Implementing intra-party democracy. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, 22. https://doi. org/10. 1177/1354068895001001002
  46. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers,. https://doi. org/10. 4324/9780203202050
  47. Setiawan, H. B., & Hertanto, H. (2023). Dampak Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka atau Tertutup di Indonesia terhadap Partisipasi Pemilih. Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 633–638. http://repository. lppm. unila. ac. id/id/eprint/53343
  48. Sunarya, A. (2023). Stunting Reduction in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(7). https://doi. org/10. 18280/ijsdp. 180727
  49. Szalma Fatimarahma. (2023). Polemik Sistem Pemilu, Ini Beda Proporsional Terbuka dan Tertutup. Bisnis. Com. https://kabar24. bisnis. com/read/20230103/15/1614780/polemik-sistem-pemilu-ini-beda-proporsional-terbuka-dan-tertutup
  50. Takdir, M., Bakhtiar, R., & Weriza, J. (2022). Evaluasi Kinerja Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan dalam Pemuktahiran Data Pemilih Tetap Pasca Pemilu 2019. Law Journal of Mai Wandeu. http://journal. wandeu. org/index. php/ljmw/article/view/74
  51. Wijaya, K. (2023). Dinamika Parpol Tentang Wacana Perubahan Sistem Pemilu 2024 dalam Perspektif Demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik. https://doi. org/10. 59581/jhsp-widyakarya. v1i2. 302
  52. Yuliah, E. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Tadbir: Media Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 30(2), 129–153. https://doi. org/10. 55108/jbk. v5i01. 303