Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 15 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the impact of service standards and work culture on customer satisfaction through employee performance in recognition of Information Security Consulting Institutions and Certification Institutions service at BSSN. The novelty of this research lies in the composition of variables and models used. Previous studies have analyzed the relationship between service standards, work culture, and customer satisfaction, indicating that both factors positively influence customer satisfaction and employee performance. However, no similar research has been conducted at BSSN, making this study valuable for policy improvements to enhance customer satisfaction through better service standards and provider performance. This research employs a quantitative method using primary data collected from questionnaires distributed to 70 respondents who use BSSN services. Data analysis uses variance-based SEM (PLS) with SMART PLS 3.0. The findings reveal that service standards, work culture, and employee performance positively influence customer satisfaction. All hypotheses are accepted, confirming that service standards and work culture, both individually and simultaneously, positively impact employee performance and customer satisfaction.

Keywords

Service Standards Work Culture Employee Performance Customer Satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Achmad, F., Riau, D. P., & Akadira, T. (2025). The Influence of Service Standards and Work Culture on Customer Satisfaction through Employee Performance : (Case Study on Public Services Recognition of Information Security Consulting Institutions and Certification Institutions at BSSN). Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 669-688. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i2.1701

References

  1. Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial least square (PLS) Alternatif structural equation modeling (SEM) dalam penelitian bisnis. (22nd ed.). CV. Andi Offset.
  2. Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing 7e. Pearson Australia.
  3. Chin, W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Dunggio, S. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Kantor Camat Dungingi Kota Gorontalo. PUBLIK: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Administrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37606/publik.v7i1.114
  6. Edison, E., Anwar, Y., & Komariah, I. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alfabeta.
  7. Ermayanti. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Pelayanan dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan (Studi Kasus di PT Blue Rose Narado) [Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi IPWI Jakarta]. http://repository.stieipwija.ac.id/id/eprint/1172
  8. Evi Satispi, Ms., Ahmad Dahlan, J. K., & Selatan, T. (2018). Teori dan Perkembangan Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. UMJ Press.
  9. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program smartpls 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage. www.cengage.com/highered
  11. Hair, J., Hult, T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Second Edition. SAGE.
  12. Hamonangan, D., Marzuki, F., & Surbakti, L. P. (2021). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Beban Kerja, dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai BNN Jakarta Timur Selama Pandemi COVID-19. PROSIDING BIEMA Business Management, Economic, and Accounting National Seminar, 2, 94–108. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/biema/article/view/1674/1145
  13. Kotler, P. (2018). Principles of Marketing 17th Edition. Pearson.
  14. Lubis, L. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kinerja Karyawan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan (Studi Kasus Pada KOPMA UMS) [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/67701/11/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI%20.pdf
  15. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2005). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Refika Aditama.
  16. Maudy, I. (2021). Pengaruh SOP (Standar Operasional Prosedur) dan Penghargaan (Reward) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan [Universitas Islam Malang]. https://repository.unisma.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/3824/S1_FIA_21701092065_IRVAN%20MAUDY.pdf?sequence=1
  17. Mukti, T. C. (2017). Pengaruh Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(1), 14–26. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229210426.pdf
  18. Nugraheni, R., Ep, A., & Budiatmo, A. (2014). Pengaruh Standar Operasional Prosedur dan Pengawasan Terhadap Kinerja Pramuniaga Pasaraya Sriratu Pemuda Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis S1 Undip, 3, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiab.2014.5194
  19. Oliver, R. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  20. Priansa, D. (2017). Komunikasi Pemasaran Terpadu pada Era Media Sosial. CV. Pustaka Setia.
  21. Ratih, D. N. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) dan Kualitas Pelayanan Frontliner Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Nasabah (Studi Kasus : BSI KCP Cirebon Arjawinangun) [Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati Cirebon]. http://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/id/eprint/13127
  22. Ratnasari, A., Handari, W., & Piksi Ganesha, P. (2021). Pengaruh Kinerja Pegawai Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan pada CV. Kampoeng Radjoet Binong Bandung Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 5(3), 1271. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i3.1571
  23. Rifdah, S., & Hasan, A. (2022). Buku Ajar Budaya Organisasi. UMSIDA Press.
  24. Rivai, A. (2020). MANEGGGIO: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Budaya organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30596/maneggio.v3i2.5291
  25. Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2017). Organizational Behavior 17th Edition. Pearson Education. http://www.pearsonmylabandmastering.com
  26. Sandra, W., & Rahmat, A. (2019). Pengaruh Budaya Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan dengan Sikap Sebagai Intervening (Studi Kasus Di PT.Telkom Witel Ridar). Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Terapan, 1(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.31849/jmbt.v1i2.8473
  27. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
  28. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Alfabeta.
  29. Triwijayanti, N., Sanoto, H., & Paseleng, M. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan, Budaya Sekolah, Citra Sekolah Terhadap Kepuasan Orang Tua. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 12, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2022.v12.i1.p74-80
  30. Widagdo, S. (2020). Penilaian Kinerja, Budaya Kerja & Kepemimpinan: Optimalisasi Peningkatan Kinerja Guru. Mandala Press.
  31. Winarni, E., & Nur Rohmah, matun. (2022). Pengaruh Kinerja Karyawan Terhadap Kepuasan, Kepercayan dan Loyalitas Konsumen (Studi Kasus pada Konsumen Hotel Elmi Surabaya). Yos Soedarso Economics Journal (YEJ), 4, 2022. https://ojs.uniyos.ac.id/index.php/YSEJ
  32. Zeng, N., Liu, Y., Gong, P., Hertogh, M., & König, M. (2021). Do right PLS and do PLS right: A critical review of the application of PLS-SEM in construction management research. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-021-0153-5