Main Article Content

Abstract

The Public-Private Partnerships Scheme (PPP) has become an important option in overcoming the gap in infrastructure financing needs. From the total number of PPP projects implemented in several countries, it was found that the number of small-scale PPP projects was relatively greater than mega PPP projects. In line with this, in the Indonesian context, regional governments are expected to be able to innovate infrastructure financing, including by using the PPP scheme. The Madiun Regency Street Lighting Equipment (APJ) PPP project is the first small-scale PPP that has completed the auction process and signed the Cooperation Agreement in Indonesia. Using the qualitative method through the relevant case study approach, this research succeeded in identifying several challenges as well as opportunities for more massive implementation potentials of small-scale PPP in APJ in the future as follows: (1) optimal risk allocations; (2) the strong commitment of the regional government as the party responsible for the cooperation project; (3) financial aspects/parameters accepted by the market; and (4) doable projects.

Keywords

Small-Scale PPP APJ Challenges Opportunities

Article Details

How to Cite
Suhendra, M., Handayani, D., Prabowo, S., & Muhammad Iqbal, R. (2023). The Challenges and Opportunities of Small-Scale Public-Private Partnership Scheme to Finance Indonesia Local Street Lighting Equipment Projects : The Case of the Madiun Regency. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 4(4), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v4i4.945

References

  1. Ahmad, A., & Shukla, S. (2014). A Preliminary Review of Trends in Small-Scale Public-Private Partnership Projects.
  2. Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2015). Public-private partnerships, management capacity and public service efficiency. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X13917703359707
  3. Bel, G., Brown, T., & Marques, R. C. (2013). Public-Private Partnerships: Infrastructure, Transportation and Local Services. Local Government Studies, 39(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.775125
  4. Biygautane, M., Hodge, G., & Gerber, P. (2018). The Prospect of Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21853
  5. Bond, D., Platz, D., & Magnusson, M. (2012). Financing small-scale infrastructure investments in developing countries. United Nations Department of Economic …, 114.
  6. Dahlman, C. J. (1979). The Problem of Externality. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1086/466936
  7. Dudkin, G., & Välilä, T. (2006). Transaction Costs in Public-Private Partnerships: A First Look at the Evidence. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 1(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359170600100209
  8. Feng, H., Grifoll, M., Yang, Z., & Zheng, P. (2021). Latest challenges to ports in public-private partnership: Case of Dandong Port (China)’s bankruptcy. Transport Policy, 110, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.011
  9. Gao, H. (2014). Public-private partnership: The Chinese dilemma. Journal of World Trade, 48(5), 983–1005. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84907276055&partnerID=40&md5=0efb497b2c1766f4503014ef3adfb8ec
  10. Global Infrastructure Facility. (n.d.). PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING PPP - PROJECT STRUCTURE PRACTICAL GUIDE EXEC SUMMARY. Retrieved November 14, 2023, from https://www.globalinfrafacility.org/knowledge/public-street-lighting-ppp-project-structure-practical-guide-exec-summary
  11. Gultom, Y. M. L. (2019). Transaction Costs and Efficiency in Design-Build Contracting: Empirical Evidence from the Transportation Infrastructure Sector in Oregon. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(5), 1230–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1572020
  12. Habibah, A. F. (2022). Sri Mulyani: UU HKPD akan bereskan tantangan desentralisasi fiskal. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2750837/sri-mulyani-uu-hkpd-akan-bereskan-tantangan-desentralisasi-fiskal
  13. Haqq, A. M., & Gultom, Y. M. L. (2021). The challenge of implementing public-private partnerships: a transaction costs perspective on waste to energy projects in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 27(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-09-2020-0058
  14. Kopańska, A., & Asinski, R. (2019). Fiscal and political determinants of local government involvement in public-private partnership (PPP). Local Government Studies, 45(6), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1635016
  15. KPPIP. (2021). Laporan KPPIP Semester 2021. In Kppip.Go.Id.
  16. Leland, S., & Read, D. C. (2013). Representative bureaucracy, public-private partnerships, and urban development. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-04-2012-0015
  17. McCorcle, M. D., & Bell, E. L. (1986). Case study research: Design and methods. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(86)90052-2
  18. Minstry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency of Republik of Indonesia. (2022). Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects Plan in Indonesia.
  19. Osei–Kyei, R., Tam, V., & Ma, M. (2022). Risk Assessment of Retirement Village Public-Private Partnership Homes. Journal of Aging and Environment, 36(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/26892618.2021.1932010
  20. Power, G. J., Burris, M., Vadali, S., & Vedenov, D. (2016). Valuation of strategic options in public-private partnerships. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 90, 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.015
  21. Shabani, H., Berisha, V., & Hajdari, V. (2021). Impact of the ownership form on cost management: A public-private partnership perspective. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.26
  22. Stake. (1995). The art of case study research. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 3(4), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024859
  23. Surachman, E. N., Suhendra, M., Prabowo, S., & Handayani, D. (2020). Dinamika Penyiapan Proyek Kerja Sama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha di Indonesia (F. Rizki, Ed.). Elek Media Komputindo.
  24. Thierie, W., & De Moor, L. (2017). Constraints related to developing small-scale PPPs and how to reduce them. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2016-0037
  25. Thierie, W., & De Moor, L. (2018). Size-dependent features of public-private partnerships: geographical and sectorial differences, deal size and structuring, and transaction costs. International Journal of Public Policy, 14(3–4), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2018.091954
  26. Thomassen, K., Vassbø, S., Solheim-Kile, E., & Lohne, J. (2016). Public-Private Partnership: Transaction Costs of Tendering. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 818–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.230
  27. Wardhana, Y. M. A., & Pradigdo, Z. A. (2022). G20 MEMBER COLLABORATION TO ACCELERATE ENERGY CONSERVATION THROUGH PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING PPP.
  28. Williamson, O. (1979). The Journal of Law and Economics-Transaction cost economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.
  29. Yuan, J., Ding, H., Huang, Z., Deng, B., Li, S., & Huang, W. (2021). Influence of market structures on concession pricing in Public-Private-Partnership utilities with asymmetric information. Utilities Policy, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101162
  30. Yukhymenko, P., Sokolska, T., Grinchuk, J., Zubchenko, V., Khakhula, B., Dzhegur, G., & Lobachova, S. (2022). Public-and-Private Partnership Institutionalization of Ukrainian Natural Resource Potential Capitalization in Decentralization. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(5), 1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.5(61).24
  31. Zhang, B., Zhang, L., Wu, J., & Wang, S. (2019). Factors affecting local governments’ public-private partnership adoption in urban China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236831