Alternative To Development of Tourist Attraction with Public Private Partnership Scheme in Magelang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i4.271Keywords:
Tourist Attraction, Public-Private Partnership, Value for MoneyAbstract
This study aims to see how the condition of the object/Tourist Attraction (TA) in Magelang Regency in Indonesia and its alternative development. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with case studies of 31 tourism objects which will then be investigated regarding their conditions and possible future developments. Research data were obtained by direct observation of the location of tourist objects and through semi-structured interviews. The results of this study illustrate that tourism objects in Magelang Regency are currently quite developed. However, this has not been able to attract general tourists to linger in the regency and provided an optimal contribution to regional income. This is because tourism objects in the regency other than Borobudur Temple have not been maximized for their existence and utilization. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme model can be an alternative to be applied in developing tourism objects accompanied by an appropriate Value for Money (VfM) analysis. Tourism objects in the form of cultural heritage can be developed through concession contracts, natural beauty can be developed through management contracts, and artificial objects can be developed through service contracts while taking into account the development needs of each tourism object. Local governments need to establish cooperation with the private sector with a Public-Private Partnership scheme accompanied by the preparation of strict regulations so that the implementation of cooperation in the context of developing tourism objects in the Magelang Regency can bring optimal benefits to all parties.
Downloads
References
Abednego, M. P., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2006). Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public–private partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.010
Akbar, D., & Ikhsan, K. (2019). Public-private Partnership dalam Pengoptimalan Wisata Bintan Mangrove. Metacommunication: Journal of Communication Studies, 4(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.20527/mc.v4i1.6358
Alireza, V., Mohammadreza, Y., Zin, R. M., Yahaya, N., & Noor, N. M. (2014). An enhanced multi-objective optimization approach for risk allocation in public–private partnership projects: a case study of Malaysia. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0342
Ameyaw, E. E., & Chan, A. P. C. (2015). Risk allocation in public-private partnership water supply projects in Ghana. Construction Management and Economics, 33(3), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1031148
Bisthomi, I., Saptono, H., & Suharto, R. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Publik Private Partnership (PPP) Antara Pemerintah dengan Swasta dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur dengan Skema Build Operate Transfer (BOT) (Studi Kasus di PT PLN (Persero). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1–12. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/10885
Bjärstig, T., & Sandström, C. (2017). Public-private partnerships in a Swedish rural context - A policy tool for the authorities to achieve sustainable rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.009
Buso, M., Moretto, M., & Zormpas, D. (2021). Excess returns in Public-Private Partnerships: Do governments pay too much? Economic Modelling, 102, 105586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105586
Ferri, R. (2018). Fasilitas Pendukung Wisata Minim, Lama Tinggal Wisatawan di Kabupaten Magelang Hanya 3 Jam. Tribun Jogja, 4. https://doi.org/https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2018/07/08/fasilitas-pendukung-wisata-minim-lama-tinggal-wisatawan-di-kabupaten-magelang-hanya-3-jam
Gultom, Y. M. L. (2021). When extractive political institutions affect public-private partnerships: Empirical evidence from Indonesia’s independent power producers under two political regimes*. Energy Policy, 149, 112042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112042
Hadji, R., Achour, Y., & Hamed, Y. (2017). Using GIS and RS for Slope Movement Susceptibility Mapping: Comparing AHP, LI and LR Methods for the Oued Mellah Basin, NE Algeria. Mining Science, 24, 235–237. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5277/msc172417
Irsyad, M., Hamid, D., & Mawardi, M. K. (2017). Implementasi Strategi Pengembangan Wisata Kebun Binatang Surabaya sebagai Destinasi Wisata di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 42(2), 59–66. https://www.e-jurnal.com/2017/03/implementasi-strategi-pengembangan.html
Ismowati, M. (2016). Kajian Urgensi Public Private Partnerships di Kota Bandung. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 8(2), 143–151. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/transparansi/article/view/67
Jacobson, C., & Ok Choi, S. (2008). Success factors: public works and public‐private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810896514
Kriswibowo, A., Pramestya, E. A., & Prasetyo, K. (2020). Implementation of Public Private Partnership in The Development of Tourism in Sumenep District. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v10i1.13661
Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik (Mahmudi (ed.); 21st ed.). UPP STIM YKPN. https://pustakaaceh.perpusnas.go.id/detail-opac?id=5608
Mahsyar, A. (2015). Public Private Partnership: Kolaborasi Pemerintah dan Swasta Dalam Pengelolaan Aset Publik di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(1). https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/1502
Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi Dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah (Mardiasmo (ed.); III). Penerbit ANDI. https://andipublisher.com/produk-otonomi-dan-manajemen-keuangan-daerah-edisi-terbaru
Mohamad, R., Ismail, S., & Mohd Said, J. (2018). Performance indicators for public private partnership (PPP) projects in Malaysia. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 34(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-04-2017-0018
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (38th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305
Pongsiri, N. (2002). Regulation and public‐private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(6), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210439634
Setyawati, D. A., & Purnaweni, H. (2018). ). Implementasi Kebijakan Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Swasta (Public Private Partnership) dalam Pengelolaan Sampah di TPA Jatibarang. Journal Of Public Policy And Management Review, 7(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v7i4.21940
Susantono, B., & Berawi, M. A. (2012). Perkembangan Kebijakan Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Transportasi Berbasis Kerjasama Pemerintah Swasta di Indonesia. Jurnal Transportasi, 12(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26593/jtrans.v12i2.475.%25p
Tavana, M., Khalili Nasr, A., Mina, H., & Michnik, J. (2021). A private sustainable partner selection model for green public-private partnerships and regional economic development. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101189
Tukuboya, M. W., Nurjaman, H. N., & Suryani, F. (2018). Public Private Partnership Pada Konservasi dan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pengaman Pantai. IKRA-ITH TEKNOLOGI : Jurnal Sains & Teknologi, 2(1). https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-teknologi/article/view/63
Widianto Yuan, J., Chan, A. P. C., Xiong, W., Skibniewski, M. J., & Li, Q. (2015). Perception of Residual Value Risk in Public Private Partnership Projects: Critical Review. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3), 04014041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000256
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
