Political Capital, Social Networks, and Electoral Leadership: Explaining Non-Party Candidate Success in Jakarta’s Local Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v7i2.2262Keywords:
regional head contests, non-political party cadres, local leadership introductionAbstract
Since the introduction of direct regional head elections in Jakarta in 2007, no incumbent governor has successfully secured a second term. This pattern indicates a unique electoral dynamic where candidates who are not strongly rooted in political party structures can compete effectively. This study examines the factors behind the victory of a non-party candidate in the 2017 Jakarta gubernatorial election and discusses its implications for political party recruitment. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis involving 20 informants, including political elites, campaign team members, academics, and community leaders. The analysis applies Pierre Bourdieu's theory of capital to understand how political, social, and economic capital interact in electoral competition. The findings show that electoral success is no longer determined solely by party machinery but by the strategic combination of different forms of capital. Among these, social capital such as public trust, community networks, and shared identity play a particularly important role in mobilizing voter support. The study concludes that success in local elections depends on the dynamic interaction between political, social, and economic capital. Based on these findings, the study proposes a preliminary framework for political party recruitment that emphasizes candidate performance and the development of social capital as key elements for strengthening democratic leadership.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bale, T., Webb, P., & Chrona, S. (2024). What do Britons Want in a Political Leader? Political Insight, 15(4), 4–7.
Bennett, W., & Livingston, S. (2020). The disinformation age. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2020). The field of power and the division of the labour of domination: Handwritten notes for the 1985–1986 Collège de France lectures. In Researching elites and power: Theory, methods, analyses (pp. 33–44). Springer.
Chadwick, A. (2024). What is Gone and What Remains in the Research on Digital Engagement? In The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Democracy (pp. 139–149). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage London.
Dassonneville, R., & Çakır, S. (2021). Party system polarization and electoral behavior. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Enli, G. (2025). Populism as “truth”: How mediated authenticity strengthens the populist message. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 83–99.
Habersack, F. (2025). Carrots and sticks: How voter loyalty and electoral opportunities shape parties’ policy priorities in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 64(3), 1440–1464.
Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2021). Populism and democracy: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Political Populism, 131–148.
Jarness, V., Flemmen, M. P., & Rosenlund, L. (2019). From class politics to classed politics. Sociology, 53(5), 879–899.
Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Digital transformations of the public arena. Cambridge University Press.
Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2020). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. In Studying politics across media (pp. 8–31). Routledge.
Kurniawan, R. (2025). Patronage Networks and Power Disparities: The Legacy of Political Patronage in Indonesia’s Governance and Democracy. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 13(1), 1–32.
Latief, H., Busro, B., & Fahham, A. M. (2019). Demokrasi Elektoral di Indonesia: Dinamika dan Tantangan. LIPI Press.
Lavarda, R., & Bellucci, C. F. (2022). Case study as a suitable method to research strategy as practice perspective. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 539–555.
Margetts, H., Lehdonvirta, V., González‐Bailón, S., Hutchinson, J., Bright, J., Nash, V., & Sutcliffe, D. (2021). The Internet and public policy: Future directions. Policy & Internet, 13(2), 162–184.
Mashuri, S. (2022). Semi-structured interview: a methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies Ruslin. IOSR Journals.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis. sage.
Moffitt, B. (2020). Populism. John Wiley & Sons.
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. In Evidence-based nursing (Vol. 22, Number 3, pp. 67–68). Royal College of Nursing.
Norris, P. (2023). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 145–174.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. cambridge university press.
Peña, Alejandro M. (2021). Activist Parties and Hybrid Party Behaviours: A Typological Reassessment of Partisan Mobilisation. Political Studies Review, 19(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920952000
Scarrow, S. E. (2021). Intra-party democracy and party unity: Varied rules, varied consequences. Representation, 57(1), 41–57.
Thompson, P. G. (2023). Armed groups: the twenty-first-century threat. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Van Bezouw, M. J., Garyfallou, A., Oană, I.-E., & Rojon, S. (2019). A methodology for cross-national comparative focus group research: illustrations from discussions about political protest: MJ van Bezouw et al. Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 2719–2739.
Waisbord, S. (2022). What is next for de-westernizing communication studies? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(1), 26–33.
Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syony Tjahjadi, Muhadam Labolo, Nurliah Nurdin, Megandaru Megandaru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
