Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores how green investment (GI) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) influence the performance of palm oil companies in Indonesia, with financial slack examined as a moderating factor. The research is motivated by the urgent need to address greenhouse gas emissions resulting from land conversion in palm oil plantations and the limited empirical studies focused on the agribusiness sector, particularly palm oil. Using a quantitative approach, the study analyzes data from eight palm oil sub-sector firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2021 to 2023, generating 24 firm-year observations. Data were obtained from annual and sustainability reports, and analyzed using structural equation modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) via Warp-PLS 8.0. The results reveal that green investment has a significant negative impact on firm performance, while corporate social responsibility exerts a positive effect. Financial slack does not moderate the relationship between GI and performance but weakens the positive influence of CSR on performance. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of GI and CSR strategies in enhancing firm performance is contingent upon the firm’s financial condition. Moreover, in capital-intensive industries like palm oil, financial slack may complicate the intended benefits of CSR. The study’s limitations, particularly the small sample size and focus on listed companies, highlight the need for broader future research.

Keywords

Green Investment CSR Financial Slack Firm Performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Rafli, M. R., Juniar, A., & Salsabila, N. G. (2025). Optimizing Green Investment and CSR to Enhance Palm Oil Firm Performance in Indonesia: The Role of Financial Slack as a Moderating Factor. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(4), 1411-1427. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v6i4.1751

References

  1. Abdillah, P., & Gunawan, S. R. A. (2023). Does Financial Slack Moderate Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) on Firm Performance? Economics and Digital Business Review, 4(2), 379–390.
  2. Agoraki, M.-E. K., Aslanidis, N., & Kouretas, G. P. (2023). How has COVID-19 affected the performance of green investment funds? Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102792
  3. Anita, A., & Jessica, J. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility dan Kinerja Perusahaan: Financial Slack sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Owner, 7(3), 2771–2784. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i3.1830
  4. Asaqdah, S. H., & Putra, R. N. A. (2021). Fundamental Environment dan Kinerja Keuangan (Studi pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Dan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di ISSI 2016-2019). AKTSAR: Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 4(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v4i1.11776
  5. Asogwa, C. I., Ugwu, O. C., Okereke, G. K. O., Samuel, A., Igbinedion, A., Uzuagu, A. U., & Abolarinwa, S. I. (2020). Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1826089. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1826089
  6. Bhandari, A., & Javakhadze, D. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Capital Allocation Efficiency. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054236
  7. Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. (2022). Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127022112762
  8. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199705)6:2<104::AID-BSE102>3.0.CO;2-T
  9. Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
  10. Dunne, D. (2019). The Carbon Brief Profile: Indonesia. CarbonBrief: Clear on Climate. https://www.carbonbrief.org/the-carbon-brief-profile-indonesia/
  11. Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
  12. Guo, J., Kubli, D., & Saner, P. (2021). The economics of climate change: no action not an option. Swiss Re Institute, April, 34.
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. In European Business Review (Vol. 26, Issue 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  14. Harsana, H., Yusniar, M. W., & Juniar, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Saham, Keputusan Pendanaan, CSR dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Jasa Konstruksi. Jurnal Riset Inspirasi Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 4(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.35130/jrimk.v4i2.87
  15. Ibrahim, R. D. B., & Larasati, I. P. (2024). SLACK RESOURCES AND CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE. JURNAL AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS JEMBER, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.19184/jauj.v22i1.47831
  16. Indriastuti, M., & Chariri, A. (2021). The role of green investment and corporate social responsibility investment on sustainable performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1960120. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1960120
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Framing and Context. In Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr43k9j.13
  18. Jinru, L., Changbiao, Z., Ahmad, B., Irfan, M., & Nazir, R. (2022). How do green financing and green logistics affect the circular economy in the pandemic situation: key mediating role of sustainable production. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 3836–3856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2004437
  19. Le, T. T. (2022). How do corporate social responsibility and green innovation transform corporate green strategy into sustainable firm performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132228
  20. Lin, W. L., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I., & Lee, C. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved firm performance? The hidden role of financial slack. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7), 957–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2018-0259
  21. Link, S., & Naveh, E. (2006). Standardization and Discretion: Does the Environmental Standard ISO 14001 Lead to Performance Benefits? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.883704
  22. Lu, Q., Chen, S., & Chen, P. (2020). The Relationship between Female Top Managers and Corporate Social Responsibility in China: The Moderating Role of the Marketization Level. Sustainability, 12(18), 7730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187730
  23. Luo, H., & Qu, X. (2023). Impact of environmental CSR on firm’s environmental performance, mediating role of corporate image and pro-environmental behavior. Current Psychology, 42(36), 32255–32269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04231-3
  24. Meiyana, A., & Aisyah, M. N. (2019). Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan, Biaya Lingkungan, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dengan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v8i1.24495
  25. Novia, J., & Candy, C. (2023). Pengaruh Green Investment Dalam Financial Performance: Efek Moderasi dari Environmental Policy. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v7i2.15567
  26. Nureen, N., Liu, D., Irfan, M., & Işik, C. (2023). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a green innovation and environmental sustainability paradigm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(21), 59349–59365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26675-1
  27. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870
  28. Okanda, T. L., Zhang, J., Sarfo, P. A., & Amankwah, O. (2025). Exploring the Nexus between Debt Financing and Firm Performance: A Robustness Analysis Using Instrumental Variables. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 12(2), 08–22. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.122.2
  29. Orazayeva, A., & Arslan, M. (2025). Effect of Financial Indicators on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Emerging Economies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(3), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18030110
  30. Rafli, M. R. (2024). An Impact Analysis of Acquisitions on Financial Performance at PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk (AMRT) For The 2016-2022 Period. Journal of Management and Islamic Finance, 4(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.22515/jmif.v4i1.8885
  31. Schembera, S. (2018). Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Insights on the Impact of the UN Global Compact on Its Business Participants. Business & Society, 57(5), 783–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316635579
  32. Setyahuni, S. W., Zakaria, F., & Oktoriza, L. A. (2023). Does Green Investment Elevate CSR Performance ? The Role of CSR Committee as Moderating Factor. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 9(2), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.26905/ap.v9i2.10574
  33. Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Javed, S. A., Zafar, A. U., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Relation of environment sustainability to CSR and green innovation: A case of Pakistani manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119938
  34. Suhardjo, I., Akroyd, C., & Suparman, M. (2024). Unpacking Environmental, Social, and Governance Score Disparity: A Study of Indonesian Palm Oil Companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070296
  35. Sun, L., & Stuebs, M. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1579-9
  36. Suroso, A. I., Tandra, H., Najib, M., & Syaukat, Y. (2020). Firm performance factors and efficiency of indonesian palm oil companies. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.17.3.227
  37. Symeou, P. C., Zyglidopoulos, S., & Gardberg, N. A. (2019). Corporate environmental performance: Revisiting the role of organizational slack. Journal of Business Research, 96, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.019
  38. Taouab, O., & Issor, Z. (2019). Firm Performance: Definition and Measurement Models. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n1p93
  39. Uadiale, O. M., & Fagbemi, T. O. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Developing Economies: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3(4), 44–54.
  40. Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmentalthreat on Product Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30767373
  41. Widiatmoko, J., & Indarti, MG. K. (2018). The Determinans Of Earnings Response Coefficient: An Empirical Study For The Real Estate And Property Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v7i2.27321
  42. Wu, Z. (2023). Does Heterogeneous CSR Affect Corporate Performance? SHS Web of Conferences, 154, 02025. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315402025
  43. Xiliang, Q., Kuo, Y.-K., Abourehab, M. A. S., Mabrouk, F., Ramirez-Asis, E., Abdul-Samad, Z., & Makes, N. (2023). The impact of ICT, green finance, and CSR on sustainable financial performance: moderating role of perceived organizational support. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 2151489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2151489
  44. Yang, M., Bento, P., & Akbar, A. (2019). Does CSR Influence Firm Performance Indicators? Evidence from Chinese Pharmaceutical Enterprises. Sustainability, 11(20), 5656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205656
  45. Yaya, O. S., Ogbonna, A. E., & Vo, X. V. (2022). Oil shocks and volatility of green investments: GARCH-MIDAS analyses. Resources Policy, 78, 102789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102789
  46. Ye, J., & Dela, E. (2023). The Effect of Green Investment and Green Financing on Sustainable Business Performance of Foreign Chemical Industries Operating in Indonesia: The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 15(14), 11218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411218
  47. Yonatan, A. Z. (2023). Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca per Kapita Indonesia Masih Baik-Baik Saja? GoodStats. https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/agneszefanyayonatan/emisi-gas-rumah-kaca-per-kapita-indonesia-masih-baik-baik-saja-dn93U
  48. Zhang, Y., & Berhe, H. M. (2022). The Impact of Green Investment and Green Marketing on Business Performance: The Mediation Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia’s Chinese Textile Companies. Sustainability, 14(7), 3883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073883
  49. Zheng, G.-W., Siddik, A. B., Masukujjaman, M., & Fatema, N. (2021). Factors Affecting the Sustainability Performance of Financial Institutions in Bangladesh: The Role of Green Finance. Sustainability, 13(18), 10165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810165