Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Social media users have grown significantly, reaching 60% of the Indonesian population. Among those users is Pandawara Group, a green social media influencer known for its environmental activism on social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram. Pandawara Group gained popularity in a short period of time due to its unique content and currently has 10 million active followers, making Pandawara Group a Mega Influencer in less than a year. This research examines the role of the Pandawara Group in promoting green purchase intention through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The study focuses on and employs a quantitative approach, utilizing surveys distributed to followers of the Pandawara Group with 122 samples collected. Then, the data is processed through SEM-PLS with the help of SmartPLS. The findings indicate that perceived credibility and expertise attributes positively affect attitudes toward green behavior. The study also finds that perceived congruence positively and significantly influences parasocial relationships, which in turn significantly influences green purchase intentions.

Keywords

Green Influencer Parasocial Relationship Green Purchase Intention Attitude Towards Green Behavior Theory of Planned Behavior

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Prayogo, G., & Adiwijaya , K. (2025). The Influence of Green Influencer towards Purchase Intention: The Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Approach. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(4), 1391-1410. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v6i4.1724

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Argyris, Y. A., Muqaddam, A., & Miller, S. (2021). The effects of the visual presentation of an Influencer’s Extroversion on perceived credibility and purchase intentions—moderated by personality matching with the audience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102347
  3. Astuti, W. D., & Risqiani, R. (2020). Impact of Social Media Influencer Marketing on the Intention to Buy Online Through Attitude on Advertising and Brands. https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.200915.051
  4. Bergkvist, L., Hjalmarson, H., & Mägi, A. W. (2016). A new model of how celebrity endorsements work: Attitude toward the endorsement as a mediator of celebrity source and endorsement effects. International Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1024384
  5. Bianchi, F., Dorsel, C., Garnett, E., Aveyard, P., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6
  6. Boerman, S. C., Meijers, M. H. C., & Zwart, W. (2022). The Importance of Influencer-Message Congruence When Employing Greenfluencers to Promote Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environmental Communication, 16(7), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2115525
  7. Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
  8. Chen, X., Hyun, S. S., & Lee, T. J. (2022). The effects of parasocial interaction, authenticity, and self‐congruity on the formation of consumer trust in online travel agencies. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(4), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/JTR.2522
  9. Chen, Y. S., Chang, T. W., Li, H. X., & Chen, Y. R. (2020). The influence of green brand affect on green purchase intentions: The mediation effects of green brand associations and green brand attitude. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114089
  10. Chetioui, Y., Benlafqih, H., & Lebdaoui, H. (2020). How fashion influencers contribute to consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0157
  11. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
  12. Dhir, A., Sadiq, M., Talwar, S., Sakashita, M., & Kaur, P. (2021). Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102398
  13. Fuadi, N. F. Z., Bukhari, B., & Firdiyanti, S. I. (2022). Halal Marketplace: The Influence of Attitude, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavior Control on Purchase Intention of Muslim Consumers. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 7(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v7i1.451
  14. Genoveva, G., Syahrivar, J., & Genoveva1, G. (2020). Green Lifestyle among Indonesian Millennials: A Comparative Study between Asia and Europe. Article in Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 8(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.12.007
  15. Gr⊘nh⊘j, A., BechLarsen, T., Chan, K., & Tsang, L. (2012). Using theory of planned behavior to predict healthy eating among Danish adolescents. Health Education, 113(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654281311293600
  16. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. In European Business Review (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 106–121). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  17. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  18. Hayes, R. A., & Carr, C. T. (2015). Does Being Social Matter? Effects of Enabled Commenting on Credibility and Brand Attitude in Social Media. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2015.1039178
  19. Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  20. Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
  21. Kamalanon, P., Chen, J. S., & Le, T. T. Y. (2022). “Why do We Buy Green Products?” An Extended Theory of the Planned Behavior Model for Green Product Purchase Behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020689
  22. Karnjanapoomi, N. (2022). Building Parasocial Relationship in Thai Cartoon Character. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.15405/EPSBS.2022.01.02.12
  23. Khalid, S., & Jalees, T. (2022). The Mediating Role of Brand Advocacy: Investigating its Antecedents and Consequences in the Context of Smart Phone Users in Pakistan. Journal of Management Sciences, 9(2), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.2209204
  24. Koay, K. Y., Cheah, C. W., & Yap, J. Y. (2023). Self-Influencer Congruence, Parasocial Relationships, Credibility, and Purchase Intentions: A Sequential Mediation Model. Journal of Relationship Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2023.2216373
  25. Koay, K. Y., Lim, W. M., Kaur, S., Soh, K., & Poon, W. C. (2023). How and when social media influencers’ intimate self-disclosure fosters purchase intentions: the roles of congruency and parasocial relationships. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 41(6), 790–809. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2023-0246
  26. Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004
  27. Li, R., Vafeiadis, M., Xiao, A., & Yang, G. (2020). The role of corporate credibility and bandwagon cues in sponsored social media advertising. Corporate Communications, 25(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2019-0108
  28. Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing: purchase intention and its antecedents. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 39(7), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-04-2021-0104
  29. Liu, M. T., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. L. (2019). Vlog and brand evaluations: the influence of parasocial interaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(2), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0021
  30. Liu, S. (2022). The Impact of Influencer Marketing on Brand Engagement: A Conceptual Framework. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 615. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.211220.383
  31. Magano, J., Au-Yong-oliveira, M., Walter, C. E., & Leite, Â. (2022). Attitudes toward Fashion Influencers as a Mediator of Purchase Intention. Information (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO13060297
  32. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. In Source: Journal of Marketing (Vol. 58, Issue 3).
  33. Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
  34. Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2007). BEST PRACTICES IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54218254
  35. Nadiya, A. F., & Ishak, A. (2022). Analisis Niat Beli dan Perilaku Konsumen terhadap Produk Perawatan Kulit Ramah Lingkungan (Vol. 01, Issue 03). https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/index
  36. Nam, L. G., & Dân, H. T. (2018). Impact of social media Influencer marketing on consumer at Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(5), 4710–4714. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v5i5.10
  37. Narasi TV. (2023). Pandawara Group: Aksi Anak Muda Bersihkan Sampah yang Viral di TikTok | Narasi TV. https://narasi.tv/read/narasi-daily/siapa-pandawara-group
  38. Nguyen-Viet, B. (2022). Understanding the Influence of Eco-label, and Green Advertising on Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Green Brand Equity. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 28(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2022.2043212
  39. Pick, M. (2021). Psychological ownership in social media influencer marketing. European Business Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-08-2019-0165
  40. Savard, I., & Kilpatrick, K. (2022). Tailoring Research Recruitment Strategies to Survey Harder‐to‐reach Populations: A Discussion Paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15156
  41. Shan, Y. (2023). Social Network Text Sentiment Analysis Method Based on CNN-BiGRU in Big Data Environment. Mobile Information Systems, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8920094
  42. Singh, J., Crisafulli, B., Quamina, L. T., & Xue, M. T. (2020). ‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis. Journal of Business Research, 119, 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.03.039
  43. Tee, P. K., Lim, K. Y., Ng, C. P., & Wong, L. C. (2022). Trust in Green Advertising: Mediating Role of Environmental Involvement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i1/12046
  44. Tiwari, A., Kumar, A., Kant, R., & Jaiswal, D. (2023). Impact of fashion influencers on consumers’ purchase intentions: theory of planned behaviour and mediation of attitude. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-11-2022-0253
  45. We Are Social & Meltwater. (2023). Digital 2023 Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-indonesia
  46. Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Wang, S., & Soutar, G. N. (2020). Influencer Endorsements: How Advertising Disclosure and Source Credibility Affect Consumer Purchase Intention on Social Media. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/j.Ausmj.2020.03.002, 28(4), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2020.03.002
  47. Xu, X., Wang, S., & Yu, Y. (2020). Consumer’s intention to purchase green furniture: Do health consciousness and environmental awareness matter? Science of the Total Environment, 704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135275
  48. Yan, M., Kwok, A. P. K., Chan, A. H. S., Zhuang, Y. S., Wen, K., & Zhang, K. C. (2023). An empirical investigation of the impact of influencer live-streaming ads in e-commerce platforms on consumers’ buying impulse. Internet Research, 33(4), 1633–1663. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2020-0625
  49. Yıldırım, S. (2021). Do green women influencers spur sustainable consumption patterns? Descriptive evidences from social media influencers. Ecofeminism and Climate Change, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EFCC-02-2021-0003
  50. Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). The effect of quality of service experience on consumers’ loyalty to music streaming services: Time pressure as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.1014199
  51. Zhao, L., Lee, S. H., & Copeland, L. R. (2019). Social media and Chinese consumers’ environmentally sustainable apparel purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(4), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2017-0183
  52. Zhuang, W., Luo, X., & Riaz, M. U. (2021). On the Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644020