Organizational Values as a Moderator of External Funding and Financial Sustainability: Evidence from Muhammadiyah and ‘Aisyiyah Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v7i4.2865Keywords:
financial sustainability, organizational values, external funding, internal audit, higher education managementAbstract
Private higher education institutions in emerging economies rely heavily on tuition, and institutions owned by Islamic organizations must also align financial decisions with religious values. This study examined how financial autonomy, internal control and audit, and external funding are associated with perceived financial sustainability, and whether organizational values moderate these associations, in the Muhammadiyah and ‘Aisyiyah higher education network in Indonesia. A cross-sectional survey of 120 of the 166 institutions in the network (72.3 percent response), each represented by one key informant, was analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modeling, a two-stage interaction approach, bootstrapping, and out-of-sample prediction tests. Financial autonomy (β = 0.231), internal control and audit (β = 0.256), external funding (β = 0.275), and organizational values (β = 0.293) were positively associated with perceived sustainability (R² = 0.639). The interaction between organizational values and external funding was negative (β = −0.322, 95% percentile bootstrap CI [−0.452, −0.135]) and added 6.8 percentage points of explained variance. The external funding association was strong where values were weakly internalized and small and uncertain where they were strongly internalized. Interactions with financial autonomy and with internal control and audit were not statistically supported. Because the data are cross-sectional and come from one informant per institution, the results describe associations. They are consistent with, but do not test, the explanation that value screening narrows usable funding options. Institutions may assess and pilot funding instruments designed to meet religious requirements from the outset, such as productive waqf, before adopting them widely.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Estimating moderating effects in PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM: Interaction term generation*data treatment. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2), 1–21.
Brahmana, R. K., & You, H. W. (2022). Do Muslim CEOs and Muslim stakeholders prefer Islamic debt financing?. Global Finance Journal, 54, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100625
Bugshan, A., & Bakry, W. K. (2025). Does being Shariah-compliant affect capital structure decision: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0259
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
De Andrés-Alonso, P., García-Rodríguez, I., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2016). Disentangling the financial vulnerability of nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(6), 2539–2560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9764-6
Fonseca, A., Jorge, S., & Nascimento, C. (2020). The role of internal auditing in promoting accountability in higher education institutions. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190267x
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
Grimes, M. G., Williams, T. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2019). Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 819–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0254
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Handayani, E., Sholihin, M., Pratolo, S., & Rahmawati, A. (2023). Distribution of income diversification on financial sustainability of Indonesian private universities: Empirical studies. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(3), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.03.202303.71
Jaafar, J. A., Latiff, A. R. A., Daud, Z. M., & Osman, M. N. H. (2023). Does revenue diversification strategy affect the financial sustainability of Malaysian public universities? A panel data analysis. Higher Education Policy, 36(1), 116–143. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00247-9
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651. https://doi.org/10.2307/256824
Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross-validated predictive ability test in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12445
Lu, J., Shon, J., & Zhang, P. (2020). Understanding the dissolution of nonprofit organizations: A financial management perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019872006
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Nik Ahmad, N. N., Siraj, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2019). Revenue diversification in public higher learning institutions: An exploratory Malaysian study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2018-0057
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409102000407
Usman, M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2023). Funding higher education through waqf: A lesson from Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2021-0217
von Schnurbein, G., & Fritz, T. M. (2017). Benefits and drivers of nonprofit revenue concentration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(5), 922–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017713876
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sulaeman, Tajul Arifin, Yadi Janwari, Sofian Al Hakim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




