The Legal Implications of Publisher Rights Regulations for Media Business Models in the Digital Platform Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v7i4.2352Keywords:
algorithmic gatekeeping, digital disruption, media business models, power imbalance, publisher rights regulationAbstract
The expansion of global digital platforms has transformed news distribution, creating asymmetrical relationships between conventional media institutions and dominant technology corporations such as Google and Meta. Platform-based distribution and algorithmic curation have shifted advertising revenues and audience traffic away from news publishers, increasing their dependence on digital intermediaries. This study examines the legal implications of Publisher Rights regulations for media business models and strategic alliance management between media companies and digital platforms. The research employs qualitative document-based juridical analysis of Publisher Rights regulations, platform licensing policies, corporate policy statements, and institutional reports from media organizations in Indonesia and Australia. Meta-synthesis integrates findings from previous empirical studies on publisher–platform relations, while reverse engineering is applied to interpret the operational logic of content distribution and monetization mechanisms. The findings indicate that Publisher Rights regulations strengthen media organizations’ bargaining positions in licensing negotiations and encourage contractual revenue-sharing arrangements with digital platforms. However, media companies remain structurally dependent on algorithmic visibility systems controlled by platforms, particularly regarding audience reach and advertising monetization. Unilateral algorithmic changes can affect traffic distribution and reduce the predictability of publisher revenues despite existing licensing agreements. These findings suggest that Publisher Rights regulations improve the legal recognition of news content ownership and provide stronger negotiation mechanisms. Nevertheless, their effectiveness in reducing platform dependency remains limited because digital platforms retain substantial control over algorithms, audience access, and monetization infrastructures. Therefore, broader governance mechanisms are required to promote transparency, accountability, and balanced relationships within digital media ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Aji, R. (2023). Media dan Infrastruktur Digital. Prenadamedia.
Andzani, D., & Irwansyah, I. (2023). Dinamika Komunikasi Digital: Tren, Tantangan, dan Prospek Masa Depan. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 4(11), 1964. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v4i11.743
Bossio, D. (2023). The News Media Bargaining Code: Impacts on Australian journalism. Politics and Governance, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6390
Bossio, D. (2025). A different playbook for the same outcome? Examining platform responses to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code. New Media & Society.
Carpes, M. (2020). Algorithmic Control in Media Platforms. Palgrave Macmillan.
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Flew, T. (2023). Platform Power and Media Inequality. Routledge.
Flew, T. (2024). Digital platforms and the future of news: Regulating publisher-platform relations in Australia and Canada. Information, Communication & Society, 27(12), 2727–2743. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2305678
Flew, T., & Wilding, D. (2021). The turn to regulation in digital communication: The Australian News Media Bargaining Code and the future of public interest journalism. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2754–2773.
Geddes, J. (2020). Digital Media, Society and Culture. SAGE.
Gould, C. F., Bailis, R., Balakrishnan, K., Burke, M., Espinoza, S., Mehta, S., Schlesinger, S. B., Suarez-Lopez, J. R., & Pillarisetti, A. (2024). In Praise of Cooking Gas Subsidies: Transitional Fuels to Advance Health and Equity. Environmental Research Letters, 19(8), 81002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d06
Heylen, K. B. (2024). A case study of platform responses to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code. Journal (MQ Research).
Hunt, R. (2024). Digi-Serfdom: Media Dependency in Platform Economies. Springer.
Iosifidis, P. (2025). Global Media Platforms and Regulation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Irwansyah Rezeki, S. R., Dharmawan, D., Saksono, L., Ekasari, S., & Abdurohim. (2023). Analysis of the Influence of Digital Information Quality, Technology Performance Expectancy, Technology Effort Expectancy, Price Value and Social Influence on Intention to Use Coffee Shop Mobile Application. Jurnal Informasi Dan Teknologi, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v5i4.434
Jiang, H. (2023). Resource dependence theory in international business: A review and future directions. Global Strategy Journal.
Kim, J., & Yum, K. (2024). Enhancing Continuous Usage Intention in E-Commerce Marketplace Platforms: The Effects of Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Trust. Applied Sciences, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177617
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2024). Algorithmic Bias in News Distribution. Korea Press Foundation.
Kohtamäki, M. (2023). Learning in strategic alliances: Reviewing the literature and proposing a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management.
Maulana, F. (2021). Media Governance in Digital Platforms. Alfabeta.
Molitorisz, S., & Attard, M. (2024). Is Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code a Model for Saving Journalism? Global Perspectives, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2024.92684
News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code (2021).
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). Comparing the platformization of news media systems. European Journal of Communication, 38(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231189010
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row.
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Rolnik, R. (2019). Platform Dominance and News Production. Editora UNESP.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-K
Suherman, A. (2025). Media Economics in Digital Era. Kompas Media.
Syahriah, R. (2023). Realizing Justice for Conventional Media in Indonesia through Publisher Rights. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues.
Taghizade, S., & Ahmadov, R. (2025). Techno-Feudalism and Media Dependence. Routledge.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 134–144.
Winseck, D. (2026). Networks of power: Media and internet concentration, platform capitalism, and the future of democracy. Journal of Digital Media and Policy.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irman Syahriar, Khairunnisah, Jamil Bazarah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




