If Aesthetics Don’t Drive Gamer Enjoyment, What Does? Insight from Valorant Skin Purchases

Authors

  • Muhammad Sa’ad Trisnawijaya Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar
  • Elia Ardyan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Ciputra Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v7i3.2189

Keywords:

Competitive Edge, Aesthetic Dominance Effect, Perceived Scarcity, Peer Validation, Perceived Enjoyment, Purchase Intention

Abstract

The Free-to-Play (F2P) business model in the digital gaming market, exemplified by Valorant, relies primarily on a monetization strategy centered on In-App Purchases (IAP) of non-functional cosmetic goods and battle passes. Unlike functional microtransactions, these IAPs are defined as virtual assets that offer aesthetic or symbolic value without providing direct mechanical advantages to gameplay. This explanatory quantitative study adopts the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) theory to test the influence of four primary stimuli, Competitive Edge, Aesthetic Dominance Effect, Perceived Scarcity, and Peer Validation Expectancy, on purchase intention through the mediating role of Perceived Enjoyment. Data were collected from 180 active Valorant players in Indonesia and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that Competitive Edge (β = 0.163, p = 0.039), Perceived Scarcity (β = 0.200, p = 0.018), and Peer Validation Expectancy (β = 0.362, p < 0.001) contribute significantly and positively to Perceived Enjoyment. However, the Aesthetic Dominance Effect was found to be non-significant (β = 0.111, p = 0.118), suggesting that visual complexity alone does not drive enjoyment in a competitive FPS context. Perceived Enjoyment was confirmed as a significant mediator, effectively converting psychological and social stimuli into Purchase Intention (β = 0.611, p < 0.001). This research contributes to the S-O-R framework by demonstrating the dominance of social signaling and mastery over pure aesthetics in the competitive gaming ecosystem. Managerially, developers are advised to implement responsible monetization by prioritizing social recognition systems and transparent scarcity triggers that enhance, rather than disrupt, the player’s hedonic experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barton, B., Zlatevska, N., & Oppewal, H. (2022a). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003

Bhandari, U., Chang, K., & Neben, T. (2019a). Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Information and Management, 56(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.003

Bhandari, U., Chang, K., & Neben, T. (2019b). Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.003

Bleize, D. N. M., & Antheunis, M. L. (2019). Factors influencing purchase intent in virtual worlds: a review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(4), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1278028

Candi, M., Jae, H., Makarem, S., & Mohan, M. (2017). Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 81, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.006

Caroux, L., & Mouginé, A. (2021). Influence of visual background complexity and task difficulty on action video game players’ performance.

Chen, A., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2016). Enhancing perceived enjoyment in social games through social and gaming factors. Information Technology & People, 29(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2014-0156

Chen, C.-H., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2019). The roles of engagement and competition on learner’s performance and motivation in game-based science learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09670-7

Cruz, C., Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2017). The need to achieve: Players’ perceptions and uses of extrinsic meta-game reward systems for video game consoles. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.017

Datta Gupta, N., Etcoff, N. L., & Jaeger, M. M. (2016). Beauty in Mind: The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Psychological Well-Being and Distress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(3), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9644-6

Deterding, S., Andersen, M. M., Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M. (2022). Mastering uncertainty: A predictive processing account of enjoying uncertain success in video game play. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924953

Duman, H., & Ozkara, B. Y. (2021). The impact of social identity on online game addiction: the mediating role of the fear of missing out (FoMO) and the moderating role of the need to belong. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4571–4580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00392-w

Esteves, J., Valogianni, K., & Greenhill, A. (2021). Online social games: The effect of social comparison elements on continuance behaviour. Information and Management, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103452

Eytam, E., Lowengart, O., & Tractinsky, N. (2021). Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products. Review of Managerial Science, 15(5), 1347–1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3

Ghazali, E. M., Al Halbusi, H., Abdel Fattah, F. A. M., Hossain Uzir, Md. U., Mutum, D. S., & Tan, F.-L. (2023). A study of player behavior and motivation to purchase Dota 2 virtual in game items. Kybernetes, 52(6), 1937–1961. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0678

Groeschel, M., & Schäfer, T. (2020). Analysis of Mobile App Revenue Models Used in the Most Popular Games of the Tower Defense Genre on Google Play. In Asian Journal of Computer and Information Systems. www.ajouronline.com

Hart, P. F., & Rodgers, W. (2024). Competition, competitiveness, and competitive advantage in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 49(11), 2153–2177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2293926

Hicks, K., Gerling, K., Dickinson, P., & Vanden Abeele, V. (2019). Juicy Game Design. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347171

Huhtiniemi, M., Sääkslahti, A., Watt, A., & Jaakkola, T. (2019). Basic Psychological Needs, Motivation and Enjoyment within Finnish Physical Education Students. In ©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (Vol. 18). http://www.jssm.org

Jiang, Z. (Jack), Wang, W., Tan, B. C. Y., & Yu, J. (2016). The Determinants and Impacts of Aesthetics in Users’ First Interaction with Websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1172443

Kaur, J., Lavuri, R., Parida, R., & Singh, S. V. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Gamification Elements in Brand Apps on the Purchase Intention of Consumers. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.317216

Lee, C. H., & Chen, C. W. (2021). Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12060241

Liu, J., Ang, M. C., Chaw, J. K., Kor, A.-L., & Ng, K. W. (2023). Emotion assessment and application in human–computer interaction interface based on backpropagation neural network and artificial bee colony algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 232, 120857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120857

Liu, T. (Tripp), Tan, C. S. L., & Quintero Rodriguez, C. (2025). Virtual consumption in luxury brands: consumer purchase motivations of virtual luxury fashion in virtual worlds. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 29(5), 844–862. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2024-0175

Marder, B., Gattig, D., Collins, E., Pitt, L., Kietzmann, J., & Erz, A. (2019). The Avatar’s new clothes: Understanding why players purchase non-functional items in free-to-play games. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.006

Martucci, A., Gursesli, M. C., Duradoni, M., & Guazzini, A. (2023). Overviewing Gaming Motivation and Its Associated Psychological and Sociodemographic Variables: A PRISMA Systematic Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 1–156. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5640258

Meng, L. (Monroe), Duan, S., Zhao, Y., Lü, K., & Chen, S. (2021). The impact of online celebrity in livestreaming E-commerce on purchase intention from the perspective of emotional contagion. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102733

Muzdalifa, D., & Taufik, E. R. (2023). Meningkatkan Repurchase Intention Melalui Perceived Ease Of Use dan Perceived Enjoyment. Tirtayasa Ekonomika, 18(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.35448/jte.v18i1.19907

Peng, L. H., & Bai, M. H. (2025). Examining the Mediating Effects of Game User Experience Satisfaction on Continuance Intention: A Case Study of League of Legends. IEEE Access, 13, 63792–63814. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3559632

Redlinger, E., Glas, B., & Rong, Y. (2022). Impact of Visual Game-Like Features on Cognitive Performance in a Virtual Reality Working Memory Task: Within-Subjects Experiment. JMIR Serious Games, 10(2), e35295. https://doi.org/10.2196/35295

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033

Satish, N. (2023). INVESTIGATING THE GROWTH AND FUTURE POTENTIAL OF E-SPORTS INDUSTRY. INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 07(08). https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM25366

Schneider, S., Nebel, S., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2020). The retrieval-enhancing effects of decorative pictures as memory cues in multimedia learning videos and subsequent performance tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1111–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000432

Shi, M., Deng, L., Zhang, M., & Long, Y. (2025). How telepresence and perceived enjoyment mediate the relationship between interaction quality and continuance intention: Evidence from China Zisha-ware Digital Museum. PLoS ONE, 20(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317784

Trewick, N., Neumann, D. L., & Hamilton, K. (2022). Effect of affective feedback and competitiveness on performance and the psychological experience of exercise within a virtual reality environment. PLoS ONE, 17(6 June). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268460

Tsai, M.-J., Huang, L.-J., Hou, H.-T., Hsu, C.-Y., & Chiou, G.-L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.011

Tyrväinen, O., & Karjaluoto, H. (2024). Willingness to pay for freemium services: Addressing the differences between monetization strategies. International Journal of Information Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102787

Wang, W., & Hang, H. (2021). Exploring the eudaimonic game experience through purchasing functional and nonfunctional items in MMORPGs. Psychology and Marketing, 38(10), 1847–1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21503

Wu, S. L., & Hsu, C. P. (2018). Role of authenticity in massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPGs): Determinants of virtual item purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 92, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.035

Yu, D., Wang, S., Song, F., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Xie, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Research on user experience of the video game difficulty based on flow theory and fNIRS. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(6), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2043442

Zendle, D., Meyer, R., & Ballou, N. (2020). The changing face of desktop video game monetisation: An exploration of exposure to loot boxes, pay to win, and cosmetic microtransactions in the most-played Steam games of 2010-2019. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232780

Zimmermann, D., Wehler, A., & Kaspar, K. (2023). Self-representation through avatars in digital environments. Current Psychology, 42(25), 21775–21789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03232-6

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Trisnawijaya, M. S., & Ardyan, E. (2026). If Aesthetics Don’t Drive Gamer Enjoyment, What Does? Insight from Valorant Skin Purchases. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 7(3), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v7i3.2189

Issue

Section

Articles