Main Article Content

Abstract

This research explores how face consciousness and acquisition centrality influence intentions to purchase counterfeit goods, with counterfeit attitude serving as a mediator and perceived anonymity as a moderator.  This study utilized a survey method and included 284 Indonesian customers. Data was evaluated using SmartPLS software and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that face consciousness has a negative effect on counterfeit attitudes (β = -0.180, p < 0.003), while acquisition centrality has a positive impact (β = 0.802, p < 0.000). Additionally, counterfeit attitude mediates the relationship between these factors and buying intentions. Perceived anonymity moderates these relationships by weakening the connection between face consciousness and counterfeit attitude (β = -0.114, p < 0.020) but enhancing the link between acquisition centrality and counterfeit attitude (β = 0.326, p < 0.000).  These findings show that social concerns and materialistic values strongly influence attitudes and intentions toward counterfeit products. Practical consequences include targeted consumer education to diminish the counterfeit appeal and promote the value of genuine products. Policymakers are asked to tighten restrictions and raise awareness of the economic and ethical consequences of counterfeit products. Marketers can use these data to differentiate their products and appeal to consumers' demand for authenticity.

Keywords

Face Consciousness, Acquisition Centrality, Counterfeit Buying Intention, Counterfeit Attitude, Perceived Anonymity

Article Details

How to Cite
Aprilliani, S., Syahbandi, Fitriana, A., Barkah, & Listiana, E. (2024). Unveiling The Impact of Face Consciousness and Acquisition Centrality on Counterfeit Buying Intention: The Mediation and Moderation Model. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(2), 502 - 518. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v6i2.1506

References

  1. Albarq, A. N. (2015). Counterfeit Products and the Role of the Consumer in Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 05(12), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2015.512079
  2. APJII. (2018). Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. Apjii. www.apjii.or.id
  3. Apriyanto, A., Afifah, N., Purmono, B. B., Rosnani, T., & Juniwati, J. (2023). The Impact of Gaming Addiction and Gamer Loyalty on Generation Z’s Impulse Buying of Virtual Items in Online Games. South Asian Research Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjbm.2023.v05i01.003
  4. Avcı, İ. (2024). The Effect of Materialism, Conspicuous Consumption and Sense of Shame on Intention to Purchase Counterfeit Products and the Mediating Role of Attitude. Current Research in Social Sciences, 10(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1378850
  5. Barlett, C. P. (2015). Anonymously Hurting Others Online: The Effect of Anonymity on Cyberbullying Frequency. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034335
  6. Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining Consumers’ Attitude Towards Purchase of Counterfeit Fashion Products. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-10-2017-0177
  7. Chasanah, U., & Mathori, M. (2021). Impulsive Buying: Kajian Promosi Penjualan, Gaya Hidup, Dan Norma Subyektif Pada Marketplace Di Yogyakarta. Jrmsi - Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 12(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrmsi.012.2.03
  8. Chubukova, O., Kostynets, I., Ponomarenko, I., Rallie, N. V., & Zymbalevska, Y. (2019). Factor Model of Social Media Marketing Effect on Brand Loyalty. SHS Web of Conferences, 65, 4011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196504011
  9. D’Arpizio, C. (2023). Renaissance in Uncertainty: Luxury Builds on Its Rebound. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/renaissance-in-uncertainty-luxury-builds-on-its-rebound/
  10. Falarungi, W., Thalib, H., & Pasamai, S. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penjualan Pakaian Merek Palsu Di Pasar Senteral Kota Makassar. Journal of Lex Philosophy (Jlp), 1(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v1i2.214
  11. Ganbold, M., & Gantulga, U. (2023). Consumer’s Personal and Social Factors on Purchase Intentions of Counterfeit Luxury Products. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(3), 1091. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.926
  12. Garas, S. R. R., Mahran, A. F. A., & Mohamed, H. (2022). Do You Consider Buying a Counterfeit? New Evidence From the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Cognitive Dissonance Theory. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(4), 544–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-11-2021-3734
  13. Hair J. F. Hult, G. T. M. Ringle, C. M. Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
  15. Jiang, L., Cui, A. P., & Shan, J. (2023). The Risk of Embarrassment in Buying Luxury Counterfeits: Do Face-Conscious Consumers Care? European Journal of Marketing, 57(8), 1996–2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-11-2021-0891
  16. Li, E. P. H., Lam, M. M. L., & Liu, W. S. (2018). Consuming Counterfeit: A Study of Consumer Moralism in China. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12428
  17. Masoom, M. R. (2020). Acquisition Centrality, Locus of Control and the Influence of Religion in Everyday Life: The Case of Urban Consumer Class of Bangladesh. European Review of Applied Sociology, 13(21), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/eras-2020-0006
  18. Michaelidou, N., Christodoulides, G., & Presi, C. (2021). Ultra-High-Net-Worth Individuals: Self-Presentation and Luxury Consumption on Instagram. European Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-11-2020-0853
  19. Moon, M. A., Javaid, B., Kiran, M., Awan, H. M., & Farooq, A. (2018). Consumer Perceptions of Counterfeit Clothing and Apparel Products Attributes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(7), 794–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-11-2017-0272
  20. Ndereyimana, C. S., Lau, A. K.-H., Lascu, D., & Manrai, A. K. (2021). Luxury Goods and Their Counterfeits in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Conceptual Model of Counterfeit Luxury Purchase Intentions and Empirical Test. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1222–1244. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-03-2021-0184
  21. None, N., Reichard, J. D., Gumbo, M. T., & None, N. (2024). Evaluating the Reliability of a Social Presence Composite Construct for Online Computer Science Degree Programmes. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17322a
  22. Nuzula, I. F., & Hidayat, A. S. (2023). The Relationship Between Product Quality, Perception of Luxury, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intent for Luxury Products: A Quantitative Study on Indonesian Social Media Users. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i9.13402
  23. Paschina, S. (2023). Challenging the Value of Authenticity: The Consumption of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Morocco. International Business Research, 16(11), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n11p1
  24. Samaddar, K., Mondal, S., & Gandhi, A. (2023). Online Counterfeit Purchase Behaviour: Moderating Effect of Perceived Anonymity and Moral Disengagement. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 25(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-10-2022-1621
  25. Singh, D., Kastanakis, M. N., Paul, J., & Felix, R. (2021). Non‐deceptive Counterfeit Purchase Behavior of Luxury Fashion Products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(5), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1917
  26. Sulistiowati, S., Fransiskus, R., Komari, N., & Afifah, N. (2024). How Are Msmes Performing Following the Covid-19 Pandemic? The Role of Msme Actors’ Creative Self-Efficacy, Dynamic Capability, and Innovative Work Behavior. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 13(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v13i1.72440
  27. Sun, J. (2024). Research on the Development of China’s Luxury Goods Industry-based on LVMH. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 24, 2159–2165. https://doi.org/10.54097/a6ffwa77
  28. Tampubolon, I. L., & Sofia, E. (2024). The Influence of Brand Reputation and Price on the Decision to Purchase Counterfeited Crocs Products (Case Study of Users of Fake Crocs Products, South Jakarta). J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen Dan Sains), 9(1), 681. https://doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v9i1.1780
  29. Tania, S., Listiana, E., Syahbandi, Ramadania, & Afifah, N. (2023). Social Media Marketing and Word of Mouth on Product Purchase Intentions at Bibit FinTech Startup With the Mediation of Brand Awareness. Journal of Economics Management and Trade, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2023/v29i21075
  30. Tseng, W.-Y., Chiu, W., & Leng, H. K. (2020). A Comparative Study of Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Counterfeit Outdoor Products in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jabes-02-2020-0011
  31. Tunçel, N. (2022). Willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury brands: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(2), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12696
  32. Vrselja, I., Lacković, D., & Lotar Rihtarić, M. (2023). Perceived Anonymity and Cyberbullying. Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja, 59(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.59.2.3
  33. Wu, Q., & Zhao, S. (2021). Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Counterfeit Luxury Products: An Empirical Test of Linear and Inverted U-Shaped Relationship. Sustainability, 13(3), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031194