Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 153 Download : 405

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the magnitude of the influence of changes in layers of taxable income Article 17 of the HPP Act, reporting of individual tax returns and awareness of taxpayers simultaneously on income tax receipts at KPP Pratama Sawah Besar One. This study used a quantitative method by distributing questionnaires to 145 respondents and using a purposive sampling technique. Data analysis was carried out by validation test, reliability test, classic assumption test, then the data was tested by multiple linear regression analysis, T test, F test, correlation coefficient (R), and coefficient of determination (R2). The results of this study are based on testing the hypothesis by using the T test and F test, changes in layers of taxable income under Article 17 of the HPP Law, individual SPT reporting and taxpayer awareness have a positive and significant effect on income tax receipts. The test results of the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.883 can be stated that the Effect of Changes in Layers of Taxable Income Article 17 of the HPP Law (X1), Individual SPT Reporting (X2) and Taxpayer Awareness (X3) on Income Tax Receipts (Y) is 88.3%, the remaining 11.7% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.

Keywords

Changes in Layers of Taxable Income Article 17 HPP Law Individual SPT Reporting Taxpayer Awareness Income Tax Receipt Law No.7 of 2021

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rulandari, N., & Rahmayani, S. (2023). The Effect of Changes in Layers of Taxable Income Article 17 of the Law on Cost of Goods Sold, Reporting of Individual Tax Returns and Taxpayer Awareness of Income Tax Receipt at the Pratama Sawah Besar One Tax Service Office. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 4(3), 407-437. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i3.861

References

  1. Astana, & Merkusiwati. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Modern dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, Vol. 18, 1 Januari 2017, Hlm. 818-846.
  2. Ischabita, N. (2022). Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, Penagihan Pajak, dan Pemeriksaan Pajak terhadap Penerimaan Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan, dan Portofolio, Vol. 02, No. 02, Hlm. 1-3.
  3. Jarkoni, & Irene Septy. (2022). Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Kualitas Pelayanan Perpajakan terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi di KPP Pratama Cibitung. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 2, No.1, Januari 2022, Hlm. 45-56.
  4. Lubis, R. A. (2018). Pengaruh Penyampaian SPT Tahunan Orang Pribadi Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi Pada KPP Pratama Medan Petisah. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
  5. Ony, & Gartina. (2015). Penerapan E-Filing dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Formal (Survey pada WP OP Pekerjaan Bebas di KPP Pratama Bandung Karees). Skip. Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Hlm. 1-16.
  6. Pramana, Z. A. (2021). Pengaruh Perubahan Tarif Pph Pasal 21 dan Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pph Pasal 21 pada KPP Pratama Medan Polonia Medan. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Medan Area.
  7. Ramdan, A. N. (2017). Pengaruh Perubahan Tarif, Metode Penghitungan dan Modernisasi Sistem Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM dengan Keadilan Pajak sebagai Variabel Moderasi pada UMKM dI Kota Makassar. Skipsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam UIN Alauddin Makassar, Hlm. 27.
  8. Setyowati, Y. (2022). Pengaruh Perubahan Tarif PPH OP, Tingkat Penghasilan, dan Sosialisasi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Berdasarkan UU No.7 Tahun 2021 (Studi Empiris di KPP Pratama Bekasi Barat). Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Darma Persada.
  9. Suharsiyah, A. (2017). Pengaruh Penyampaian SPT Tahunan Orang Pribadi Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi Pada KPP Pratama Medan Polonia. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
  10. Wandira, R. (2017). Pengaruh Pemeriksaan Pajak, Sanksi Perpajakan dan Self Assessment System Dan Dampaknya Pada Penerimaan Pajak (Survey Pada KPP di Wilayah Kota Bandung). Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pasundan.
  11. Basson, C. P. (2015). The implications of wealth transfer taxation in the absence of estate duty (Master’s thesis. The University of Cape Town. https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/item/16569/thesis_com_2015_bsschr009-thesis.pdf?sequence=1
  12. Basten, C., von Ehrlich, M., & Lassmann, A. (2017). Income Taxes, Sorting and the Costs of Housing: Evidence from Municipal Boundaries in Switzerland. Economic Journal, 127(601), 653–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12489
  13. Bird-Pollan, J. E. (2016). Taxation of Wealth Transfers: A Philosophical Analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. ProQuest, 103082232).
  14. Blickenstorfer, M., & Lichtsteiner, H. (2014). Impacts of Income Distribution, Taxes, and Direct Democracy on Foundation Activity. Voluntas, 26(6), 2604–2619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9533-3
  15. Bosman, S. (2020). An analysis of wealth taxes applicable to the transfer of capital assets by an individual in South Africa. North-West University. Potchefstroom.
  16. Brunner, J. K., Eckerstorfer, P., & Pech, S. (2013). Optimal taxes on wealth and consumption in the presence of tax evasion. Journal of Economics/ Zeitschrift Fur Nationalokonomie, 110(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0314-4
  17. Cnossen, S. (2018). Corporation taxes in the European Union: Slowly moving toward comprehensive business income taxation? International Tax and Public Finance, 25(3), 808–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9471-2
  18. Creedy, J., & Sanz-Sanz, J. F. (2010). Revenue Elasticities in Complex Income Tax Structures: An Application to Spain. Fiscal Studies, 31(4), 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2010.00124.x
  19. Freebairn, J. (2012). Personal Income Taxation. Economic Papers, 31(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00168.x
  20. González Canché, M. S. (2022). Post-purchase Federal Financial Aid: How (in)Effective is the IRS’s Student Loan Interest Deduction (SLID) in Reaching Lower-Income Taxpayers and Students? Research in Higher Education, 63(6), 933–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09672-6
  21. K.P.M.G. (2019). India Income Tax. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2011/12/india-income-tax.html
  22. Kunze, L. (2012). Capital Income Taxation, Economic Growth and Heterogeneity in the Motivation to Give. German Economic Review, 13(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00555.x
  23. Liu, H., Xia, Q., & Xu, J. (2011). Notice of Retraction: Taxpayer compliance in China: A prospect theory analysis. 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce, AIMSEC 2011 - Proceedings, 7292–7297. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6009750
  24. Majcen, B., Verbič, M., Bayar, A., & Čok, M. (2009). The income tax reform in slovenia. Eastern European Economics, 47(5), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8775470501
  25. Muller, E. (2010). A Framework for Wealth transfer taxation in South Africa (Doctoral thesis. The University of Pretoria, South Africa. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf8a/5b6777744d3486ed11e861f1e132408775f3.pdf
  26. Neisser, C. (2021). THE ELASTICITY OF TAXABLE INCOME: A META-REGRESSION ANALYSIS. Economic Journal, 131(640), 3365–3391. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab038
  27. Ordower, H. (2014). Schedularity in U.S. income taxation and its effect on tax distribution. Northwestern University Law Review, 108(3 SPEC. ISSUE), 905–924. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904684648&partnerID=40&md5=84d19e4c7183b4e6eb0263c47089a2b6
  28. Rahmi, N., Selvi, S., & Purwaningtyas, A. S. (2022). Pentahelix Collaboration in Improving Taxpayer Compliance. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i4.562
  29. Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2015). Income shifting incentives and tax haven utilization: Evidence from multinational US firms. International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 458–485.
  30. Rogers, M. Z., & Weller, N. (2014). Income taxation and the validity of state capacity indicators. Journal of Public Policy, 34(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1300024X
  31. Ruggeri, G. C., & Vincent, C. (2018). An economic analysis of income tax reforms. In An Economic Analysis of Income Tax Reforms. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453489
  32. Samuel, S. E., & Simon, S. (2011). The effect of Income Tax on Dividend Policy of Financial Institutions in Nigeria. Continental Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 1–6.
  33. Sölvi Kristjánsson, A. (2013). Redistributive effects in a dual income tax system. FinanzArchiv, 69(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522113X666917
  34. Wijaya, S., & Sunaryo, R. P. (2020). Evaluation of the implementation of the value added tax collection obligation by the village treasurers in Klaten, Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(2), 2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I2/S20201287
  35. Xu, Y. (2022). Distributive Justice and Income Taxation: Is Hong Kong Special? British Tax Review, 2022(2), 172–201. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132894657&partnerID=40&md5=2cf15e93c420c96fde73f83676d63952
  36. Zhan, P., Li, S., & Xu, X. (2019). Personal Income Tax Reform in China in 2018 and Its Impact on Income Distribution. China and World Economy, 27(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12279