Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 860 Download : 11730

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to review the implementation of automatic exchange of information (AEoI) from the perspective of its effectiveness in minimizing tax evasion and to analyze the inhibiting entities and encouraging entities in AEoI in minimizing tax evasion. The research approach used in this study is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques using in-depth interviews, observation, literature/ documentation studies and source triangulation. The results of the study conclude that the Implementation of AEoI in minimizing tax evasion so far has been quite effective according to international standards, although there are still many complete data sets that have not been fulfilled by partner countries, resulting in data provided by partner countries cannot be used by the Indonesian tax authorities. However, the performance of AEoI has not yet provided optimal results in increasing tax revenue, especially in 2020, its progress has been hampered by the Covid 19 Pandemic. On the other hand, Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) still has obstacles. There are four obstacles and challenges in AEoI, namely: First, the Reciprocity of Information Exchange (Reciprocity). Second, banking tends to be resistant to data access. Third, the lack of technology that supports AEoI. Fourth, the complexity of Conversion of Tax Revenue Data. The Entity that drives this information exchange in minimizing tax avoidance is the existence of an Information Exchange System called the "Common Transmission System (CTS).

Keywords

Effectiveness Automatic Information Exchange Tax Evasion

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pohan, C. A., Rahmi, N., Arimbhi, P., & Junaidi, A. (2022). Automatic Exchange of Information Review from the Perspective of its Effectives in Minimizing Tax Evasion . Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(2), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i2.462

References

  1. Adegboye, A., Uwuigbe, U., Ojeka, S., Uwuigbe, O., Dahunsi, O., & Adegboye, K. (2022). Driving information communication technology for tax revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Telecommunications Policy, 46(7), 102329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102329
  2. Aditya, G. N. I. A. (2021). Perhitungan Kebijakan Insentif Pajak Penghasilan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Eqien: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.34308/eqien.v8i2.247
  3. Alexeev, M., & Zakharov, N. (2022). Who profits from windfalls in oil tax revenue? Inequality, protests, and the role of corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 197, 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.010
  4. Amendolagine, V., De Pascale, G., & Faccilongo, N. (2021). International capital mobility and corporate tax revenues: How do controlled foreign company rules and innovation shape this relationship? Economic Modelling, 101, 105543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105543
  5. Aritonang, J. (2020). Analisis Penyebab Kekalahan DJP Pada Sengketa Pajak Sehubungan Dengan Penetapan Secara Jabatan. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 953–973. https://jurnal.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/snkn/article/view/595
  6. ATPETSI. (2020). DJP Akan Kembali Bertukar Data AEoI Mulai Bulan Depan. Asosiasi Tax Center Perguruan Tinggi Seluruh Indonesia. https://atpetsi.or.id/djp-akan-kembali-bertukar-data-aeoi-mulai-bulan-depan
  7. Berger, L. A., & Sikora, M. J. (1994). The Change Management Handbook: A Road Map to Corporate Transformation (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.amazon.com/Change-Management-Handbook-Corporate-Transformation/dp/1556239750
  8. Brown, K. B. (2012). A Comparative Look at Regulation of Corporate Tax Avoidance (K. B. Brown (ed.)). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2342-9
  9. Butarbutar, R. (2017). Hukum Pajak Indonesia dan Internasional (O. D. Putri (ed.); 1st ed.). Gramata Publishing. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1146222
  10. Chang, Y.-M., & Sargsyan, R. (2022). Revenue-neutral or profit-neutral tariff and tax reforms under imperfect competition: Welfare implications. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.029
  11. Febyani, Y. M., & Widodo, J. (2020). Peran AEoI Dalam Keterbukaan Informasi Pajak Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia. Dialogue: Jurnal Administrasii Publik, 2(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v2i2.9921
  12. Gokhale, H. (2021). Japan’s carbon tax policy: Limitations and policy suggestions. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100082
  13. Hemling, L., Plesner Rossing, J. C., & Hoffjan, A. (2022). The use of information technology for international transfer pricing in multinational enterprises. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 44, 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100546
  14. Indahsari, D. N., & Fitriandi, P. (2021). Pengaruh Kebijakan Insentif Pajak di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Penerimaan PPN. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 3(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v3i1.1202
  15. Ispriyarso, B. (2020). Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) dan Penghindaran Pajak. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.172-179
  16. Jacobsson, S., Arnäs, P. O., & Stefansson, G. (2020). Automatic information exchange between interoperable information systems: Potential improvement of access management in a seaport terminal. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 35, 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100429
  17. Knobel, A., & Meinzer, M. (2014). Automatic Exchange of Information: An Opportunity for Developing Countries to Tackle Tax Evasion and Corruption (pp. 1–57). Tax Justice Network. https://www.taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/AIE-An-opportunity-for-developing-countries.pdf
  18. Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Lim, W. M., Chatterjee, A. N., & Pandey, N. (2021). What do we know about transfer pricing? Insights from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 134, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.041
  19. Lahiri, K., & Yang, C. (2021). Boosting tax revenues with mixed-frequency data in the aftermath of COVID-19: The case of New York. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.10.005
  20. Majoral, G., Gasparín, F., & Saurí, S. (2021). Application of a Tax to E-Commerce Deliveries in Barcelona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(10), 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211012412
  21. Matti, S., Nässén, J., & Larsson, J. (2022). Are fee-and-dividend schemes the savior of environmental taxation? Analyses of how different revenue use alternatives affect public support for Sweden’s air passenger tax. Environmental Science & Policy, 132, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.024
  22. Maydiana, A. (2022, January 2). Menyoroti Tantangan Besar Pertukaran Informasi Pajak Otomatis. Independent News, 5. https://independennews.com/menyoroti-tantangan-besar-pertukaran-informasi-pajak-otomatis/
  23. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (38th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305
  24. Nan, D., Tan, J., Zhang, L., Jingus, J., Wang, C., & Liu, W. (2022). Research on the remote automatic test technology of the full link of the substation relay protection fault information system. Energy Reports, 8, 1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.130
  25. Ndoricimpa, A. (2021). Tax reforms, civil conflicts and tax revenue performance in Burundi. Scientific African, 13, e00927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00927
  26. Neraca, A. (2015, September 16). Praktik Transfer Pricing Sebabkan Indonesia Rugi Rp100 T. Okezone, 15. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2015/09/16/20/1215476/praktik-transfer-pricing-sebabkan-indonesia-rugi-rp100-t
  27. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Neuman-Social-Research-Methods-Qualitative-and-Quantitative-Approaches-7th-Edition/PGM74573.html
  28. Pablo, S. (2019, March 18). Sri Mulyani Kejar Temuan Dana WNI Rp 1.300 T di Luar Negeri. CNBC Indonesia, 6. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190318111021-4-61249/sri-mulyani-kejar-temuan-dana-wni-rp-1300-t-di-luar-negeri
  29. Padyanoor, A. (2020). Kebijakan Pajak Indonesia Menanggapi Krisis COVID-19: Manfaat bagi Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(9), 2216. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i09.p04
  30. Pohan, C. A. (2019). Pedoman Lengkap Pajak Internasional (2nd ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://ebooks.gramedia.com/books/pedoman-lengkap-pajak-internasional-ed-revisi
  31. Pohan, C. A. (2021). Kebijakan dan Administrasi Perpajakan Daerah di Indonesia (1st ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://ebooks.gramedia.com/books/kebijakan-dan-administrasi-perpajakan-daerah-di-indonesia
  32. Sarwoko, J. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2239K/PID.SUS/ 2012 (p. 679). Mahkamah Agung. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/2dec38361ab4193b649785cf9c668f52.html
  33. Selvi. (2018). Automatic Exchange of Information sebagai Big Data di Bidang Perpajakan. Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 1(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.31334/trans.v1i1.144
  34. Siswanto, D. (2022, February 13). Ini Kekurangan Ditjen Pajak Kemenkeu dalam Memanfaatkan Data AEoI. Tabloid Kontan, 5. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ini-kekurangan-ditjen-pajak-kemenkeu-dalam-memanfaatkan-data-aeoi
  35. Steens, B., Roques, T., Gonnet, S., Beuselinck, C., & Petutschnig, M. (2022). Transfer pricing comparables: Preferring a close neighbor over a far-away peer? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100471
  36. Stefano, G. da S., Antunes, T. dos S., Lacerda, D. P., Morandi, M. I. W. M., & Piran, F. S. (2022). The impacts of inventory in transfer pricing and net income: Differences between traditional accounting and throughput accounting. The British Accounting Review, 54(2), 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101001
  37. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  38. Supriyadi. (2019). Automatic Exchange of Information sebagai Sarana Meningkatkan Empat Pilar Kepatuhan Pajak. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi, 6(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v6i2.525
  39. Suwiknyo, E. (2020a). Tiga Tahun Berjalan, Ini Perkembangan Pertukaran Informasi Keuangan. Ekonomi Bisnis. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20200923/259/1295506/tiga-tahun-berjalan-ini-perkembangan-pertukaran-informasi-keuangan
  40. Suwiknyo, E. (2020b, November 2). Pertukaran Data Informasi Keuangan Berlanjut. Bisnis Indonesia, 5. https://koran.bisnis.com/m/read/20201102/433/1312153/navigasi-perpajakan-pertukaran-data-informasi-keuangan-berlanjut
  41. Tempo, M. (2014, April). Prahara Pajak Raja Otomotif. Rubrik Investigasi Majalah Tempo, 30. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/investigasi/145213/prahara-pajak-raja-otomotif
  42. Tibulca, I.-L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tax revenues in the EU. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1954967
  43. Wantasen, M. A., Sondakh, J. J., & Suwetja, I. G. (2021). Analisis Penerimaan Pajak Sebelum dan Sesudah Adanya Insentif Pajak Bagi Wajib Pajak yang Terdampak Covid-19 Selama Masa Pandemi Pada KPP Pratama Manado. Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 16(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.16.4.37587.2021
  44. Wibowo, J. L. (2017). AEOI dan Kesiapan Indonesia. Artikel Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. https://www.pajak.go.id/id/artikel/aeoi-dan-kesiapan-indonesia
  45. Yang, S., Guo, J., & Wei, R. (2017). Semantic interoperability with heterogeneous information systems on the internet through automatic tabular document exchange. Information Systems, 69, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2016.10.010
  46. Zarghami, S. A. (2021). A reflection on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Australian businesses: Toward a taxonomy of vulnerabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 64, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102496
  47. Zucman, G. (2015). The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens (1st ed.). The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo20159822.html

Most read articles by the same author(s)