Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1335 Download : 9319

Main Article Content

Abstract

With the innovation in tax administration services in Indonesia in the digitalization era, it is hoped that it can increase taxpayer compliance and is expected to continuously have a positive effect on state revenues. The purpose of this study is to analyze what are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the implementation of tax administration innovations in Indonesia in the Digitalization Era. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The results of the study show that the strengths and opportunities that can be utilized are the reliability of human resources that have been fulfilled, as evidenced by the satisfaction index of DGT service users reaching a scale of 4.1. Technology that can still be developed is also a strength. The high participation of taxpayers in following the innovation policy of tax administration is a very big opportunity with the number of manual SPT users recorded which has decreased by 88.8% in the last five years. Weaknesses and threats encountered are the lack of maintenance on the server where server downs often occur during the deadline for reporting SPT. Taxpayers also admitted that they had not fully received directions on how to operate the new tax administration system. Taxpayers need to adapt to the digitalization that is being carried out. So it is the government's duty to pay extra attention to the understanding of taxpayers in the application of the digital tax administration system.

Keywords

SWOT Analysis Tax Administration Innovation Digitalization Era

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahmi, N., & Gangodawilage, D. (2022). SWOT Analysis of Indonesian Tax Administration Innovation in the Digitalization Era. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i1.423

References

  1. Abdelfattah, T., & Aboud, A. (2020). Tax avoidance, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility: The case of the Egyptian capital market. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 38, 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100304
  2. Adi, I. K. Y. (2020). Efektifitas E–Filing Terhadap Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dengan Tingkat Keamanan dan Kerahasiaan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Badung Utara). Journal of Applied Management and Accounting Science, 2(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.51713/jamas.v2i1.26
  3. Anggraini, D., Damayanti, & Nurmala. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan Bisnis dengan Pemanfaatan Insentif Pajak dan Digitalisasi UMKM di Era New Normal. Jurnal Kajian Agribisnis Dwijen Agro, 11(1), 24–32. http://ejournal.undwi.ac.id/index.php/dwijenagro/article/view/1081
  4. Bahmid, N. S., & Wahyudi, H. (2018). Pengaruh Pemungutan Pajak Hotel dan Pajak Hiburan Terhadap Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kota Medan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.30596/jrab.v18i1.2046
  5. Bai, C., Quayson, M., & Sarkis, J. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small- enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035
  6. Barnay, A., Davis, J., Dimson, J., Gibbs, E., & Korn, D. (2018). Four Innovations Reshaping Tax Administration. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/four-innovations-reshaping-tax-administration
  7. Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Weiss, A., Torgler, B., Fooken, J., Fuller, J., Schaffner, M., Banuri, S., Hassanein, M., Alarcón-García, G., Aldemir, C., Apostol, O., Bank Weinberg, D., Batrancea, I., Belianin, A., … Zukauskas, S. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191
  8. Cheba, K., Kiba-Janiak, M., Baraniecka, A., & Kołakowski, T. (2021). Impact of external factors on e-commerce market in cities and its implications on environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, 103032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103032
  9. Cheng, L.-C., Chen, K., Lee, M.-C., & Li, K.-M. (2021). User-Defined SWOT analysis – A change mining perspective on user-generated content. Information Processing & Management, 58(5), 102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102613
  10. Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2020). Laporan Tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Tahun 2020. https://pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan-2020
  11. Erawati, S. H., & Wance, F. (2021). Analisis SWOT Untuk Menentukan Strategi Manajerial Perusahaan yang Efektif. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial INSPIRASI, 18(1), 366–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29100/insp.v18i1.1922
  12. Faúndez-Ugalde, A., Mellado-Silva, R., & Aldunate-Lizana, E. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence by tax administrations: An analysis regarding taxpayers’ rights in Latin American countries. Computer Law & Security Review, 38, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105441
  13. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (I. Ghozali (ed.); 8th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. http://kin.perpusnas.go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=218217&pRegionCode=UN11MAR&pClientId=112
  14. Hasanah, N., & Indriani, S. (2013). Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Self Assessment System dan Modernisasi Administrasi Pajak Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pajak (Studi Kasus Pada KPP Kebon Jeruk 1). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi, 8(1), 17–35. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/wahana-akuntansi/article/view/651
  15. Jannah, A., Suratno, A., & Sulistiyani, E. (2017). Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Berbasis SWOT pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Semarang Candisari. Jurnal of Business Studies JOBS, 3(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32497/jobs.v3i2.1482
  16. Kementerian Keuangan. (2021). Informasi APBN 2021: Percepatan Pemulihan Ekonomi dan Penguatan Reformasi. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/16835/informasi-apbn-2021.pdf
  17. Kudrle, R. T. (2021). Moves and countermoves in the digitization challenges to international taxation. Technology in Society, 64, 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101453
  18. Lintang, K., Kalangi, L., & Pusung, R. (2017). Analisis Penerapan E-Faktur Pajak dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Pengusaha Kena Pajak untuk Pelaporan SPT Masa PPn pada KPP Pratama Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(2), 2023–2032. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v5i2.16486
  19. McKinsey and Company. (2017). The Opportunity in Government Productivity. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/the-opportunity-in-government-productivityhttps://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/the-opportunity-in-government-productivity
  20. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
  21. Olivares, B. D. (2018). Technological innovation within the Spanish tax administration and data subjects’ right to access: An opportunity knocks. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(3), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.012
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021). Tax Administration: Digital Resilience in the Covid-19 Environment. https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/tax-administration-digital-resilience-in-the-covid-19-environment.htm
  23. Redaksi DDTCNews. (2019). Melihat Dampak Administrasi Pajak di Era Digital. Laporan DDTC Dari India. https://news.ddtc.co.id/melihat-dampak-administrasi-pajak-di-era-digital-18069
  24. Redaksi DDTCNews. (2021). Dibalik Digitalisasi Administrasi Pajak. Reformasi Perpajakan. https://news.ddtc.co.id/di-balik-digitalisasi-administrasi-pajak-32420
  25. Rusli, Y. M. (2019). Pengaruh Efektivitas Penerapan E-filling dan Modernisasi Sistem Perpajakan Indonesia Terhadap Efektivitas Pemrosesan Data Perpajakan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v12i1.1509
  26. Schauffel, N., Schmidt, I., Peiffer, H., & Ellwart, T. (2021). Self-concept related to information and communication technology: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100149
  27. Silaen, S., & Widiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis (1st ed.). In Media. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=992941
  28. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  29. Sulistyowati, N. W., Amah, N., & Setyaningrum, F. (2020). The Effectiveness Application of E-Invoice VAT to The Taxable Entrepreneurs in KPP Pratama Madiun. Jurnal Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan Profita, 13(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.22441/profita.2021.v13i3.002
  30. Surya, D. (2020, February 22). Efektivitas Penggunaan Teknologi Digital untuk Administrasi Pajak. Pajakku, Artikel Pajakku. https://www.pajakku.com/read/5ef2b5930abad75bad0c60b7/Efektivitas-Penggunaan-Teknologi-Digital-untuk-Administrasi-Pajak
  31. Syafitri, Y. (2018). Penerapan Digitalisasi Administrasi Perpajakan dalam Upaya Mengoptimalkan Penerimaan Pajak di Tiga KPP [Universitas Parahyangan]. In UNPAR Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7064
  32. Wulandari, D. S. (2021). Digitalisasi Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan dan Biaya Kepatuhan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Journal of Accounting Science, 5(1), 36–70. https://jas.umsida.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/1131
  33. Zhou, J., He, P., Qin, Y., & Ren, D. (2019). A selection model based on SWOT analysis for determining a suitable strategy of prefabrication implementation in rural areas. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101715