Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 110 Download : 63

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and describe the problem of a weak human development index in North Kayong Regency using the Public Policy, Governance, and Human Development approaches. The phenomenon that occurs is important to discuss for three reasons: education is still low, health and supporting facilities are still lacking, and the standard of living of the community is still lacking. The method used in the research is the descriptive qualitative method. The results of this study indicate that the low HDI of North Kayong Regency is influenced by three indicators. First, education in North Kayong Regency is low, this is also influenced by the mindset of the community regarding the importance of education which is still lacking, and the weak government support regarding supporting facilities and infrastructure, especially in the Karimata Islands District area. Second, public health which is still lacking makes people vulnerable to diseases that can also affect a person's lifespan. The weakness of health improvement programs and the lack of health facilities and personnel are obstacles in the process of implementing health programs in North Kayong Regency. Third, community livelihoods in North Kayong Regency are also still lacking, such as high unemployment and poverty.

Keywords

Policy Governance Development Strategy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Aryada, K. T., Martoyo, & Sihaloho, N. T. P. (2024). Policy Strategy to Improve Human Development Index in Kayong Utara District. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(4), 1017-1027. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i4.1254

References

  1. Brendehaug, E., Aall, C., & Dodds, R. (2017). Environmental policy integration as a strategy for sustainable tourism planning: issues in implementation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1259319
  2. Çop, S., Olorunsola, V. O., & Alola, U. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2646
  3. Crawford, G., & Andreassen, B. A. (2015). Human rights and development: Putting power and politics at the center. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(3), 662–690. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2015.0053
  4. Enroth, H. (2014). Governance: The Art Of Governing After Governmentality. European Jornal Of Society Theory, 17(1), 60–76.
  5. Forge, S., & Vu, K. (2020). Forming a 5G strategy for developing countries: A note for policy makers. Telecommunications Policy, 44(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101975
  6. Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. J. (2015). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Routledge.
  7. Gemiharto, I., & Rulandari, N. (2024). Challenges Of Population Services Through Population Administration Information Systems In Jakarta Buffering Area. Politeia : Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, 2(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.61978/POLITEIA.V2I1.170
  8. Halibas, A. S., Sibayan, R. O., & Maata, R. L. (2017). The Penta Helix Model Of Innovation In Oman: An HEI Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information.
  9. Haryono, N. (2012). Jejaring Untuk Membangun Kolaborasi Sektor Publik.
  10. Kibria, A. S. M. G., Behie, A., Costanza, R., Groves, C., & Farrell, T. (2021). Potentials of community-based-ecotourism to improve human wellbeing in Cambodia: an application of millennium ecosystem assessment framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 28(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1855606
  11. Lerback, J. C., Bowen, B. B., Macfarlan, S. J., Schniter, E., Garcia, J. J., & Caughman, L. (2022). Development of a graphical resilience framework to understand a coupled human-natural system in a remote arid highland of Baja California Sur. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 1059–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01101-6
  12. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2022). “Sustainable or Unsustainable” in Higher Education Internationalization Development: Exploring the Post-Doctoral System in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711024
  13. Martínez Hernández, J. J., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2021). Business-oriented environmental regulation: Measurement and implications for environmental policy and business strategy from a sustainable development perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2634
  14. Martoyo. (2010). Prilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Implikasinya. Rajawali Pers.
  15. Martoyo. (2016). Fokus & Lokus Ilmu Administrasi Publik. FAM Publihin.
  16. Martoyo. (2019). Isu-isu Pembangunan Teori dan Politik. Sarana Gracia.
  17. Mulia, G. (2014). Sugiono. Alfabeta. Suprayogo, Imam.
  18. Pratamawaty, B. B., Cahyadini, A., Julianja, S., & Veronica, G. S. (2019). Policy Communication Strategy of Restaurant Tax to Increase Bandung’s Own-Source Revenue. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 248(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012068
  19. Ramdani, M. (2015). Determinasi Kemiskinan Di Indonesia Tahun 1982-2012. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 4(1).
  20. Rogach, O. V, Frolova, E. V, & Ryabova, T. M. (2019). Formation of municipal service human resource potential as a strategic factor for russian territory sustainable development1. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.74181
  21. Rulandari, N. (2020). The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the World of Education in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 1(4), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.52728/IJSS.V1I4.174
  22. Sangkereng, W., Engka, D. S. M., & I, J. (2019). SumualFaktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(4).
  23. Sari, U. P. (2015). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  24. Temple, N. J. (2023). A Proposed Strategy against Obesity: How Government Policy Can Counter the Obesogenic Environment. Nutrients, 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15132910
  25. U.N.D.P. (1995). Human Development Report 1995, Published for United Nations Development Programme. Oxford University Press.
  26. Wang, C. H., & Juo, W.-J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241–3254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2800
  27. Widaningsih, M., & Rulandari, N. (2021). Penguatan Kelembagaan Dalam Meningkatkan Sektor Ekonomi Melalui Investasi. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, 8(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.31334/REFORMASI.V8I1.1420
  28. Yektingisih, E. (2018). Analisis Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (Ipm) Kabupaten Pacitan Tahun 2018. Jurnal Agribisnis Pertanian, 18(2).
  29. Yembise, S. Y. (2018). Kata Pengantar. In PembangunanManusia Berbasis Gender Tahun 2018, by Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak (p. 5). Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak.
  30. Yuningsih, T., Darmi, T., & Sulandari, S. (2019). Model Pentahelik Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata di Kota Semarang. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations, 84–93.