Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 84 Download : 121

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia's title as the most generous country in the world is supported by the strengthening spirit of social piety movements among the Muslim middle class. Social piety movements are of course also supported by the power of the social movement's collective identity in forming the basis that provides the "structure," foundation for engagement, and guidance for individual participation in its expansion. Unfortunately, the strong link between the development of collective identity in social movement groups has not been explained by previous studies. The aim of this research is to describe how the boundary work mechanism contributes to the development of collective identity in the Muslim middle class social piety movement in the Tangan di Atas (TDA) community. Using qualitative descriptive research, the research was conducted over a period of one year (December 2022-December 2023) and describes the actors and boundary work mechanisms in forming collective identity. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with several subjects who were administrators as well as members of the TDA community to explore variations in their experiences related to the social piety movement they engage in. Meanwhile, with a phenomenological approach, researchers explore the role of individual knowledge, thoughts and feelings or internal aspects or individual subjectivity. The results of this research show that there are several aspects that can be used to view boundary works as a mechanism for forming the collective identity of social piety movements in the TDA community; shared values ​​and principles, joint activities, mutual recognition and appreciation, and establishing relationships with external parties.

Keywords

Social Movements Social Piety Boundary Work Collective Identity Muslim Middle Class

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, S., Ishomuddin, Wahyudi, & Saleh, A. (2024). Boundary Works as a Mechanism For Forming Collective Identity in The Indonesian Middle Class Muslim Social Piety Movement. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 14-32. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v5i1.1061

References

  1. Aeni, N., & Nuriyanto, L. K. (2020). Religiusitas Kelas Menengah Muslim Surakarta; Interaksi dengan Globalisasi dan Modernitas. Harmoni, 19(2), 232–251.
  2. Afandi, A. K. (2007). Fenomenologi: Pemahaman Terhadap Pikiran-Pikiran Edmund Husserl. Surabaya: ELKAF.
  3. Charities Aid Foundation. (2021). CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021 A global pandemic special report. In www.cafonline.org (Issue June).
  4. Creswell, W. J. (2017). Research Desain, Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Faisal, M. (2017). Generasi Phi: Memahami Milenial Pengubah Indonesia. Republika Penerbit.
  6. Gahral, A. D. (2010). Pengantar Fenomenologi. Depok: Koekoesan.
  7. Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications.
  8. Gravante, T., & Poma, A. (2016). Environmental self-organized activism: emotion, organization and collective identity in Mexico. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(9/10), 647–661.
  9. Haenfler, R. (2004). Collective identity in the straight edge movement: How diffuse movements foster commitment, encourage individualized participation, and promote cultural change. Sociological Quarterly, 45(4), 785–805.
  10. Hidayah, S. N. M., & Bastomi, H. (2020). Peran Masyarakat Sipil Keagamaan di Tengah Pandemi: Analisis Peran Nahdatul Ulama (NU) Dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid 19 di Indonesia. Community Development: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 4(2), 129–156.
  11. Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2004). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. Blackwell Companion to Social Movements., 433–457.
  12. Kartika, A. (2021). Gerakan Sosial Digital “Warga Bantu Warga” Sebagai Respon Masyarakat Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Pandemi. Brawijaya Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 14–30.
  13. Kasdi, A. (2019). Membangun Kemandirian Melalui Filantropi Kaum Perempuan; Potensi Kedermawanan Untuk Pemberdayaan Perempuan Indonesia. PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender, 12(1), 99–126.
  14. Kurniawan, T. (2022). Strategi Kebijakan Pembangunan Sosial Melalui Gerakan Filantropi Islam di Kabupaten Belitung. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 7(2), 116–133.
  15. Maftuhin, A. (2022). Filantropi Islam: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik. Magnum Pustaka.
  16. Main, A. (2018). Fenomenologi Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. PRENADAMEDIA GROUP.
  17. Mardani, D. A. (2022). Agama dan Marketplace: Muslim Baru sebagai Arus Utama dalam Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Global. La Zhulma| Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 1(1), 51–63.
  18. Mellyan, M., & Inayatillah, I. (2021). Konsep Filantropi Islam Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. AT-TASYRI’: JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI MUAMALAH, 13(2), 157–171.
  19. Melucci, A. (1988). Getting Involved: Identity and Mobilization in Social Movements., International Social Movement Research. A Research Annual. From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, 1.
  20. Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. Social movements and culture (Ed.) H. Johnston, & B. Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 41.
  21. Muna, A. A. (2020). Ekspresi Keberagamaan Selebriti Hijrah: Sebuah bentuk ‘Accomodating Protest’dan Ekonomi-Politik dari ‘Public Piety.’ Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 5(1), 1–16.
  22. Muslikhah, K., & Kurniawan, N. (2023). Implementasi Konsep Dan Praktik Filantropi Islam Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Penelitian Thawalib, 2(1), 47–58.
  23. Nurhabibi, P., Helmi, R. F., Permana, I., Ruddin, F., & Saputra, B. (2022). Transisi New Normal: Bagaimana Masyarakat Rural dapat Bertahan? Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP), 4(4), 230–241.
  24. Pribadi, Y., & Ghufron, Z. (2019). Komodifikasi Islam dalam Ekonomi Pasar: Studi Tentang Muslim Perkotaan di Banten. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(1), 82–112.
  25. Puspa, F. F. D., & Astanujati, N. K. (2021). The Failure on Our Governance: Reaksi Masyarakat Sipil terhadap Kebijakan Publik di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal PolGov, 3(2), 397–432.
  26. Rassanjani, S., & Dahlawi, D. (2022). Zakat dan Kedermawanan Sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perlindungan Sosial Selama Pandemi. Sosio Informa: Kajian Permasalahan Sosial Dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, 8(2).
  27. Saputra, S., Pujiati, & Simanihuruk, M. (2020). Pengemasan Ideologi Dalam Gerakan Hijrah (Studi Kasus Gerakan Komunitas Sahabat Hijrahkuu di Medan). Civic-Culture: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PKn Dan Sosial Budaya, 4(1), 287–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31597/cc.v4i1.166
  28. Silastia, S., Rahmadini, S., Mayvea, N. A. J., Abdillah, A., & Suharyat, Y. (2023). Model Pengelolaan Zakat, Infaq, dan Shodaqoh dalam Pembangunan Suatu Negara. Student Scientific Creativity Journal, 1(3), 393–413.
  29. Susilo, R. K. D. (2022). Persoalan Pengembangan Identitas Kolektif melalui Aksi Bersama pada Kelompok Aksi. Seminar Nasional Sosiologi, 3, 226–243.
  30. Warapsari, D. (2020). Crowdfunding Sebagai Bentuk Budaya Partisipatif pada Era Konvergensi Media: Kampanye #BersamaLawanCorona (Kitabisa. com). Avant Garde, 8(1), 1–19.