Main Article Content

Abstract

This research examines the Flight Information Region (FIR) boundary adjustment between Indonesia and Singapore that affects Indonesia's air navigation sovereignty. Various efforts have been made by Indonesia to take over control of the FIR from Singapore, until finally reaching an agreement in adjusting the FIR boundary in 2022. However, in taking over the FIR, Indonesia faced problems, namely the difficulty of Indonesia taking over the management of the FIR which was previously managed by Singapore, as well as challenges in meeting international standards in FIR management. Although the agreement in adjusting the FIR boundary has been agreed, until now the effort has not achieved the expected results in realizing air navigation sovereignty in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how FIR boundary adjustment can improve Indonesia's air traffic management, national security and economic growth. Obstacles include sovereignty issues, international air traffic management standards, and diplomacy between countries. This research uses the policy analysis method by collecting primary and secondary data to analyze the agreement reached in 2022. The results of this study show that the 2022 Indonesia-Singapore FIR adjustment agreement has not fully guaranteed Indonesia's air navigation sovereignty, but this agreement provides significant progress in Indonesian territory. The implications of the results of this study include improving air traffic efficiency and strengthening Indonesia's sovereignty over its airspace, which can also provide insights for future foreign policy and international cooperation.

Keywords

Air Navigation Sovereignty FIR Boundary Realignment Agreement Flight Information Region

Article Details

How to Cite
Jasmine, D., & Sugara, R. (2024). Air Navigation Sovereignty Through Indonesia-Singapore Fir Boundary Realignment In 2022 . Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v5i1.1039

References

  1. Abdurrasyid, P. (2009). State Sovereignity in Airspace. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol6.4.215
  2. AirNav Indonesia. (2018). Fasilitas CNS-A Indonesia.
  3. Berz, G. E., & Bergamasco, F. (2017). A practical way forward for aviation multi-constellation service provision based on the ICAO GNSS charter. 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS 2017, 2, 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.15155
  4. Buyle, S., Dewulf, W., Kupfer, F., Onghena, E., Meersman, H., & Van de Voorde, E. (2021). From traditional to professional Air Navigation Service Provider: A typology of European ANSP business models. Journal of Air Transport Management, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.102006
  5. Convention on International civil aviation Chicago. (1944). Handbook of International Law, December, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511841460.020
  6. Cooper, J. C. (1957). The Russian Satellite - Legal and Political Problems. 24(4).
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitave, and Mixed Methods Procedures. In SAGE Publishing (fifth edit).
  8. Direktoral Jenderal Perhubungan Udara. (2022). Kesepakatan Penyesuaian FIR Sudah Dipersiapkan Dengan Matang dan Mendatangkan Manfaat Bagi Indonesia.
  9. Dobson, A. (2017). A History of International Civil Aviation: From its Origins through Transformative Evolution. In A History of International Civil Aviation: From its Origins through Transformative Evolution. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180601
  10. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penerbangan, 5 DPR RI 12 (2009).
  11. Fitriyanti, R. (2021). Implikasi Kebijakan Jalur Sutra Maritim Cina terhadap Kekuatan Poros Maritim Dunia Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1, 55–87.
  12. Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
  13. Goedhuis, D. (1955). Air Sovereignty Concept and United States Influence on its Future Development. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 22(2), 209.
  14. ICAO. (2022). Safety Audit Results: USOAP interactive viewer.
  15. Indonesian Goverment. (2022). Mempertegas Kedaulatan Udara Indonesia. Indonesia.Go.Id.
  16. Kania, D. D., Ulfa, A., & Sari, M. (2020). Indonesia’s Diplomacy on Flight Safety Issues. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTRANSLOG), 7(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v7i2.421
  17. Lestari, E. P. (2018). The Delegation of State Sovereignty over Air Space in the Implementation of Air Navigation: The Analysis of the Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore on Management of the Batam and Natuna Flight Information Region. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no2.813
  18. Liu, J., Guo, W., Guo, C., Gao, K., & Cui, J. (2020). Rethinking ubiquitous mapping in the intelligent age. Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 49(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190539
  19. Margaretha, R., Gani, A. J. A., Sarwono, S., & Nuh, M. (2023). Identification of Stakeholders on the Impact of Management of the Flight Information Region (FIR) Kepulauan Riau - Natuna (Vol. 2). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-082-4_31
  20. Michaelides-Mateou, S. (2017). Customary international law in aviation: A hundred years of travel through the competing norms of sovereignty and freedom of overflight. In Reexamining Customary International Law (pp. 309–345). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316544624.011
  21. Mintojati, S. (2022). Effect of Re-alignment Flight Information Region Above Natuna and Riau Islands to Indonesia’s Sovereignty. International Journal of Law, Tourism, and Culture, 1(1), 1–17.
  22. Morgenthau, H. J. (1949). Natioal Interest and Moral Principle in Foreign policy, The Primacy of the National Interest. American Scholar, XVIII. Spring.
  23. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2022). Persetujuan Antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Republik Singapura Tentang Penyesuaian Batas Antara Flight Information Region Jakarta dan Flight Information Region Singapura. 1–14.
  24. Polkowska, M. (2018). Limitations in the airspace sovereignty of states in connection with space activity. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20(3), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.5151
  25. Prabandari, A. P. (2019). Indonesia’S Air Sovereignty Issues in the Global Era. Diponegoro Law Review, 4(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.4.2.2019.181-193
  26. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 109 Tahun 2022, (2022).
  27. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2022). Lima Elemen Penting Kesepakatan Penyesuaian FIR Indonesia – Singapura.
  28. Sergunin, A., & Konyshev, V. (2017). Russian military strategies in the Arctic: change or continuity? European Security, 26(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1318849
  29. Supriyadi, A. A., Gultom, RAG., Manessa, MDM., & Setyanto, A. (2020). Strategy for the Alignment of Singapore Flight Information Region Over Indonesian Airspace. The Open Transportation Journal, 14(1), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802014010204
  30. Surbakah, A. R. (2019). Kepentingan Indonesia Mengambil Alih Flight Information Region (FIR) di Singapura. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 3(1), 145–155.