Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 393 Download : 314

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Management is applied in business, government, universities, schools, industry, and learning. Teaching factory learning is production-based learning or services according to industry standards and procedures. The resulting product is sold, so marketing is needed. Teaching factory learning is a replica industry in schools. Thus, teaching factory is related to management, teachers, students, industry, consumers, and marketing, so that management is needed in its management. Management of teaching factory in vocational high school, regulated according to the implementation of teaching factory. The purpose of this research is to describe the management of the teaching factory, covering the organizational structure and management of the teaching factory. This type of research is qualitative descriptive. The research sample was 14 SMK in East Java. Data collection methods use interviews and observations. The results showed that the management of teaching factories in vocational high schools was different. The organizational structure involves the principal, vice principal, head of expertise program, productive teacher and education personnel. In addition, there are outside parties, namely partner companies and school supervisors. Teaching factory management includes planning that consists of planning learning equipment, planning products, and planning marketing. Implementation includes production, marketing. Supervision includes evaluation of the implementation of teaching factory and follow-up.

Keywords

COVID-19 Management models Solutions Teaching factory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suhartini, R. (2022). Teaching Factory Management in Vocational High Schools. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 3(2), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v3i2.448

References

  1. Abele, E., Bauerdick, C. J. H., Strobel, N., & Panten, N. (2016). ETA Learning Factory: A Holistic Concept for Teaching Energy Efficiency in Production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.051
  2. Anfara, V., & Mertz, N. (2006). Seeking an Understanding of School Culture: Using Theory as a Framework for Observation and Analysis. In Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research (pp. 2–22). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986335.n1
  3. Bedolla, J. S., D’Antonio, G., & Chiabert, P. (2017). A Novel Approach for Teaching IT Tools within Learning Factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.049
  4. Carter, W. (2020). Putting choice in the spotlight to advance theory on organizational adaptation to technological discontinuities. Organization Management Journal, 17(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-04-2019-0720
  5. Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Mourtzis, D. (2013). Manufacturing Systems: Skills & Competencies for the Future. Procedia CIRP, 7, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.004
  6. Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The Teaching Factory: A Manufacturing Education Paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 57, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (S. Z. Qudsy (ed.); 3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1213690
  8. Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C., Aburaia, M., Otrebski, R., Rauer, J., & Orsolits, H. (2020). Research-based teaching in Digital Manufacturing and Robotics – the Digital Factory at the UAS Technikum Wien as a Case Example. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.089
  9. Higham, J. E. S., Hopkins, D., & Orchiston, C. (2019). The work-sociology of academic aeromobility at remote institutions. Mobilities, 14(5), 612–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1589727
  10. Joiner, T. A., & Bakalis, S. (2006). The antecedents of organizational commitment: the case of Australian casual academics. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683694
  11. Jooste, J. L., Louw, L., Leipzig, K. von, Conradie, P. D. F., Asekun, O. O., Lucke, D., & Hagedorn-Hansen, D. (2020). Teaching maintenance plan development in a learning factory environment. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.040
  12. Kumar, R., Patil, O., Nath S, K., Sangwan, K. S., & Kumar, R. (2021). A Machine Vision-based Cyber-Physical Production System for Energy Efficiency and Enhanced Teaching-Learning Using a Learning Factory. Procedia CIRP, 98, 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.128
  13. Le, V. T., Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System, 105, 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102755
  14. Mavrikios, D., Alexopoulos, K., Georgoulias, K., Makris, S., Michalos, G., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). Using Holograms for visualizing and interacting with educational content in a Teaching Factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.063
  15. Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The Teaching Factory Paradigm: Developments and Outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029
  16. Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062
  17. Merkel, L., Atug, J., Merhar, L., Schultz, C., Braunreuther, S., & Reinhart, G. (2017). Teaching Smart Production: An Insight into the Learning Factory for Cyber-Physical Production Systems (LVP). Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.034
  18. Moleong, J. L. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Rosdakarya Youth.
  19. Morlock, F., Kreggenfeld, N., Louw, L., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2017). Teaching Methods-Time Measurement (MTM) for Workplace Design in Learning Factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.033
  20. Mourtzis, D., Boli, N., Dimitrakopoulos, G., Zygomalas, S., & Koutoupes, A. (2018). Enabling Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to improve their potential through the Teaching Factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.014
  21. Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., Angelopoulos, J., Zygomalas, S., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Stavropoulos, P. (2021). A Hybrid Teaching Factory Model for Supporting the Educational Process in COVID-19 era. Procedia CIRP, 104, 1626–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.274
  22. Pham, L. N., & Tin, T. B. (2022). Exploring learner interest in relation to humanistic language teaching materials: A case from Vietnam. System, 105, 102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102731
  23. Rentzos, L., Doukas, M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating Manufacturing Education with Industrial Practice Using Teaching Factory Paradigm: A Construction Equipment Application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126
  24. Singh, A. (2019). Challenges in developing university-industry relationship: Quantitative evidence from higher education institutions in the UAE. Emerald Open Research, 1, 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/emeraldopenres.12891.1
  25. Stavropoulos, P., Bikas, H., & Mourtzis, D. (2018). Collaborative Machine Tool design: the Teaching Factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.004
  26. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  27. Thang, N. N., Dung, N. V., Phi, H. D., & Trang, C. X. (2021). Knowledge management and organisational innovation in higher education. International Journal of Management in Education, 15(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2021.10036595
  28. Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Abele, E., Metternich, J., & Tenberg, R. (2016). Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(12), 1355–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033017
  29. Wong, D. S. K., Zaw, H. M., & Tao, Z. J. (2014). Additive manufacturing teaching factory: driving applied learning to industry solutions. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 9(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2014.950487
  30. Yin, R. K. (2012). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23279888