Main Article Content

Abstract

Various government efforts to break the Covid-19 chain have also affected the economy, as many companies have laid off employees on a large scale. This has resulted in an increase in the number of claims for the Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) for Employment or BPJAMSOSTEK. The purpose of the study was to find out a Case Study of Digital-Based Service Innovation for Old Age Security Claims (JHT) by BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (BPJAMSOSTEK) Pekalongan Branch Office, Central Java. Research methods. The research method used to describe the problems that exist in this study is a qualitative method with a study approach. Primary data sources in this study came from interviews with informants. The informants in this case are employees who are directly involved in the implementation of public services, leaders and participants as users of services provided by BPJAMSOSTEK Pekalongan City Branch, Central Java. The technique used in this study was carried out in several steps, namely, data reduction (sorting, focusing and attention), data presentation (display) and drawing conclusions. Research result. The innovation attributes at BPJAMSOSTEK Pekalongan City Branch are in accordance with the relative advantage, suitability, complexity, possibility to try and ease of observation. In terms of acceptance of the information system, it is seen from 2 elements, namely the ease of use and the usefulness of the LAPAKASIK information system in accordance with the Theory Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): In the Internal User/BPJAMSOSTEK Aspect In the External Aspect User/BPJAMSOSTEK Participant.

Keywords

Digital-Based Service Innovation Old Age Insurance Claims

Article Details

How to Cite
Sofiana, M., Seiver Langelo, J., Supriyadi, E., Maulina, A., & Wahyuni, R. (2022). Case Study of Digital-Based Service Innovation for Old Age Insurance (JHT) Claims by BPJS Employment (BPJAMSOSTEK) Pekalongan Branch Office Central Java. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v3i1.302

References

  1. Ali, M., Awaluddin, M., & Salam, A. (2019). Efektivitas Pelayanan Digital Program Samsat Keliling Di Kota Mataram. JIAP (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31764/jiap.v7i1.770
  2. Anugerah, A. R., Muttaqin, P. S., & Purnama, D. A. (2021). Effect of large-scale social restriction (PSBB) during COVID-19 on outdoor air quality: Evidence from five cities in DKI Jakarta Province, Indonesia. Environmental Research, 197, 111164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111164
  3. Ariyani, A., Mindarti, L. I., & Nuh, M. (2016). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi pada Pelayanan Kesehatan Melalui Program Gebrakan Suami Siaga di Puskesmas Gucialit Kabupaten Lumajang). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(4), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2016.002.04.4
  4. Barbour, N., Menon, N., & Mannering, F. (2021). A statistical assessment of work-from-home participation during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100441
  5. Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2021). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public managers’ attitudes toward digital transformation. Technology in Society, 67, 101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101776
  6. Beckmann-Wübbelt, A., Fricke, A., Sebesvari, Z., Yakouchenkova, I. A., Fröhlich, K., & Saha, S. (2021). High public appreciation for the cultural ecosystem services of urban and peri‑urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103240
  7. Chi, O. H., Saldamli, A., & Gursoy, D. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on management-level hotel employees’ work behaviors: Moderating effects of working-from-home. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 98, 103020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103020
  8. Cruz, S. S., & Paulino, S. R. (2021). Experiences of innovation in public services for sustainable urban mobility. Journal of Urban Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.10.003
  9. Desmarchelier, B., Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2021). Which innovation regime for public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs)? Lessons from a European cases database. Research Policy, 50(9), 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104341
  10. Dewi, K. R. P., & Sunarta, I. N. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PPKM) Darurat Jawa-Bali Dalam Menanggulangi COVID-19 Di Kota Denpasar. Restorica: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33084/restorica.v7i2.2585
  11. Eprilianto, D. F., Sari, Y. E. K., & Saputra, B. (2019). Mewujudkan Integrasi Data Melalui Implementasi Inovasi Pelayanan Kesehatan Berbasis Teknologi Digital. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v4n1.p30-37
  12. Esien, E. B. (2020). Enabling State and Third-country Nationals: In Local Government and Private Agencies Contracting for Counselling. Kariérové Poradenstvo v Teórii a Praxi, 17, 21–43. https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/150578/140095829.pdf?sequence=1
  13. Faraj, S., Renno, W., & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100337
  14. Gupta, V., Santosh, K., Arora, R., Ciano, T., Kalid, K. S., & Mohan, S. (2022). Socioeconomic impact due to COVID-19: An empirical assessment. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102810
  15. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
  16. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629
  17. Herdiana, D. (2020). Penanggulangan COVID-19 Tingkat Lokal Melalui Kebijakan Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru (AKB) di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Journal of Governance Innovation, 2(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v2i2.442
  18. Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212
  19. Kemenpan RB. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi tentang Pedoman Inovasi Pelayanan Publik. In Kemenpan RB (Issue 30). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/132748/permen-pan-rb-no-30-tahun-2014
  20. Malahayati, M., Masui, T., & Anggraeni, L. (2021). An assessment of the short-term impact of COVID-19 on economics and the environment: A case study of Indonesia. EconomiA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2021.12.003
  21. Maryam, N. S. (2016). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, VI(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v6i1.232
  22. Munawaruzaman, A. (2020). Implementation of Digital Transformation of the Ministry of Agraria To Improve Public Services. Prosiding Senantias 2020, 1(1), 589–598. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/Senan/article/view/9038/5739
  23. Musdalipa, M., Parawangi, A., & Malik, I. (2017). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Desa Parigi Kecamatan Tinggimoncong Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Kolaborasi, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v3i1.893
  24. Nugroho, A., Amir, H., Maududy, I., & Marlina, I. (2021). Poverty eradication programs in Indonesia: Progress, challenges and reforms. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(6), 1204–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.05.002
  25. Permana, D., Muchsin, S., & Suyeno. (2021). Inovasi Program Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Digital Government (Studi Kasus pada Pengadilan Agama di Kota Malang). Jurnal Respon Publik, 15(1), 32–40. http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/rpp/article/view/10013
  26. Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2020). Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 145, 103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732
  27. Rohman, A., & Larasati, D. C. (2020). Standar Pelayanan Publik Di Era Transisi New Normal. Reformasi, 10(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v10i2.1952
  28. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  29. Strotmann, C., Baur, V., Börnert, N., & Gerwin, P. (2021). Generation and prevention of food waste in the German food service sector in the COVID-19 pandemic – Digital approaches to encounter the pandemic related crisis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101104
  30. Windarwati, H. D., Oktaviana, W., Mukarromah, I., Ati, N. A. L., Rizzal, A. F., & Sulaksono, A. D. (2020). In the middle of the COVID-19 outbreak: Early practical guidelines for psychosocial aspects of COVID-19 in East Java, Indonesia. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113395
  31. Yanuar, R. M. (2019). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus: Public Safety Center (PSC) 119 Kabupaten Bantul Sebagai Layanan Kesehatan dan Kegawatdaruratan). Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan KEMUDI, 04(01), 1–19. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/kemudi/article/view/1335