Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 17 Download : 1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research explores the role of social entrepreneurs in creating social impact through implementing good governance. Social entrepreneurs often combine business goals with social missions, using sustainable business models to address social issues such as poverty, the environment, and education. Good governance is the key to success because it ensures transparency, accountability, and inclusive participation in decision-making. This qualitative research highlights how good governance practices can strengthen the legitimacy and sustainability of social enterprises and increase positive impacts in society, especially in Bali. This research explores the role of social entrepreneurs in creating sustainable social impacts through the Theory of Change approach and the Penta Helix model. Theory of Change is used to formulate effective social transformation strategies by identifying the ultimate goal and the critical steps needed to achieve it. Meanwhile, the Penta Helix model facilitates collaboration between five key elements—government, academics, business, community, and media—to strengthen the social innovation ecosystem. This research highlights how social entrepreneurs can utilize these two approaches to strengthen good governance, increase accountability, and expand positive impacts on society through inclusive and sustainable partnerships.

Keywords

Theory of Change, Social Entrepreneur, Social Enterprise governance, Social Activity, Penta Helix, Sustainable Development Goals

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wiryana, K. V. S. D., & Mahyuni, L. P. (2024). The Role of Social Entrepreneurs in Increasing Sustainability Values through Good Governance Practices: Case Study of Pesona Plastic in Bali . Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(2), 415 - 424. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v6i2.1466

References

  1. Abdillah, A., & Ahmadi, Z. (2022). Tata kelola berkelanjutan: studi tentang idealitas model tata kelola daerah Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia. Kybernology: Journal of Government Studies, 2(1), 44-69.
  2. Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani, M. (2020). Seni mengelola data: Penerapan triangulasi teknik, sumber dan waktu pada penelitian pendidikan sosial. Historis: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 146-150.
  3. Coryn, C. L., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 199-226.
  4. Cristofel, C., & Kurniawati, K. (2021). Pengaruh enterprise risk management, corporate social responsibility dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 14(1).
  5. De Silva, M. J., Breuer, E., Lee, L., Asher, L., Chowdhary, N., Lund, C., & Patel, V. (2014). Theory of change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions. Trials, 15, 1-13.
  6. Brock, D. D. (2008). Social entrepreneurship teaching resources handbook. Available at SSRN 1344412.
  7. Dewi, I. G. A. A. Y. (2018). Peran Generasi Milenial Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Plastik Di Desa Penatih Dangin Puri Kecamatan Denpasar Timur Kota Denpasar. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(2), 84-92.
  8. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. a, Johnson, R. a, &Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownershipn Heterogenety and Internal Governance onCorporate Innovation Strategies. Academy of Management, 45(4), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069305
  9. Imsar, R. D., & Harahap, N. H. (2023). Strategi Pendayagunaan Zakat Produktif Untuk Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Mustahik Era Pandemi Covid-19: Studi Kasus Pada LAZNAS IZI Sumut.
  10. Jelita, R. (2022). Produksi eco enzyme dengan pemanfaatan limbah rumah tangga untuk menjaga kesehatan masyarakat di era new normal. Jurnal Maitreyawira, 3(1), 28-35.
  11. Kahfi, A. (2017). Tinjauan terhadap pengelolaan sampah. Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 4(1), 12-25.
  12. Khamimah, W. (2021). Peran Ecopreneurship Dalam Mengatasi Sampah Plastik Di Surabaya (Studi Kasus Pada Asri Recycle Mojo Surabaya). JEBDEKER: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Bisnis Digital, Ekonomi Kreatif, dan Entrepreneur, 2(2), 11-18.
  13. Nugrahani, F., & Hum, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books, 1(1), 3-4.
  14. Prayati, N. M. V., & Kartika, N. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Program Bank Sampah Terhadap Pendapatan Nasabah Bank Sampah Di Kota Denpasar. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana, 7(6), 1256-1281.
  15. Purnawanti, H., Radyati, M. R. N., & Utha, M. A. (2022). Strategi keberlanjutan social enterprise. e-Jurnal Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan, 11(2), 85-98.
  16. Ratiabriani, N. M., & Purbadharmaja, I. B. P. (2016). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam program bank sampah: model logit. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 9(1), 228346.
  17. Ramadani, D. H., & Nugraheni, N. (2024). UPAYA PENINGKATAN Pendidikan Indonesia Dalam Mencapai Target Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia (JPPI), 1(3), 126-132.
  18. Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. C. (2020). Change theory and theory of change: what’s the difference anyway?. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-12.
  19. Romao, D. M. M., Setti, C., Arruda, L. H. M., de Melo, R. C., de Araujo, B. C., Tan, A. R., ... & Kuchenmüller, T. (2023). Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review. Plos one, 18(3), e0282808.
  20. Huybrechts, B.; Nicholls, A. 2012. Social entrepreneurship: Definitions, drivers and challenges. In Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business: An Introduction and Discussion with Case Studies; Springer Gabler: Wiesbade, Germany, pp. 31–48
  21. Raharja, B. S., & Yuliani, N. L. (2019). TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN (CG) DAN TINGKAT INOVASI PERUSAHAAN. Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen, 13(1).
  22. Sahita, C. L., & Setyoningrum, Y. (2023). Inovasi Pesona Plastic pada Sampah Plastik untuk Kebutuhan Interior. Waca Cipta Ruang, 9(2), 109-121.
  23. Salam, O. D. (2020). Personal branding digital natives di era komunikasi media baru (analisis personal branding di media sosial instagram). Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences Journal (BECOSS), 2(1), 19-30.
  24. Schreiber, R. (1998).Cluein G in : a G Uid E To So Lvin G Th E Pu Zzle. 269–289.Taylor, James B. (1970).Introducing Social Innovation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 6: 69–77
  25. Sembiring, C. C. B., Ulinuha, D., & Saraswati, N. L. G. R. A. (2023). Identifikasi Sampah Laut (Marine Debris) di Pantai Petitenget, Bali. Current Trends in Aquatic Science VI, 2, 119-126.
  26. Siregar, N. Y., & Safitri, T. A. (2019). Pengaruh pengungkapan enterprise risk management, intellectual capital, corporate social responsibility, dan sustainability report terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis Darmajaya, 5(2), 53-79.
  27. Utomo, R. B., & Dewi, M. H. U. (2023). Sinergitas pemerintah dan elemen masyarakat dalam meningkatkan kemajuan ekonomi melalui penguatan pariwisata desa.
  28. Wibowo, D., & Ekawardhani, Y. (2022). Exploration of Interior Material Based on Plastic Waste. In Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities (Vol. 5, pp. 510-517).
  29. Yusuf, E. S., Fahmi, I., & Indrawan, R. D. (2022). Strategi Keberlanjutan dan Model Bisnis Kopi Arabika di Jawa Barat: Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Garut. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 20(1), 73-94.