Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 12 Download : 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Customs and Excise Audit is the authority held by the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in accordance with 125/PMK.04/2007 concerning Customs Audits. West Java's DGCE (one that has that function) has nine audit teams and aims to complete 42 audit reports in 2023. In mid-October 2023, this office received a non-regular audit assignment of seven auditees and had to select a team that could be assigned from a total of nine audit teams. The average audit completion time from 2017 to mid-2023 has always increased. Audits ideally finish within three months of assignment, as per Minister of Finance Regulation No. 125/PMK.04/2007, Article 12, paragraph (1). The author uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the decision-making process to determine seven audit teams with the smallest potential for audit report lag. Collaboration with experts and previous research results are also used to determine the criteria in the process. Notably, the identification of audit teams 1 and 5 as having the highest potential for audit report lag, based on criteria derived from expert collaboration and previous research, was empirically validated. Both teams, when assigned audits under real-world conditions, produced reports with completion times exceeding the average, underscoring the predictive validity of the study's methodology.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arafat, Y., & Novani, S. (2024). Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Selecting Audit Team to Reduce Audit Report Lag. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v6i1.1454

References

  1. Abed Aljasim Muhisn, Z., Omar, M., Ahmad, M., & Adnan Muhisn, S. (2015). Team Leader Selection by Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique. Journal of Software, 10(10), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.17706/jsw.10.10.1216-1227
  2. Alves De Moraes, E., Bernardes, R. C., & Camanho, R. (n.d.). Project Portfolio Management using AHP.
  3. Binti, N., & Madan, A. (2021). ACL: How Competent are Royal Malaysian Customs Department (RMCD) Auditors in Utilizing It?
  4. Bititci, U., Carrie, A., & Turner, T. (2010). Integrated performance measurement systems: Structure and dynamics. In Business Performance Measurement (pp. 174–197). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511753695.012
  5. Boujelbene, Y., Mhamedi, A. El, Khatrouch, I., Kermad, L., & Elmehamedi, A. (n.d.). An integrated Case-Based Reasoning and AHP method for team selection. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271194824
  6. Decision Support System for Developer Selection of The Project in TBIG Using The Fuzzy AHP Method. (2020). International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(9), 5637–5644. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/118892020
  7. Ferrara, G., Bucci, V., & Campagna, A. (2023). Audit, presumptive taxation, and efficiency: An integrated approach for tax compliance analysis. Economic Systems, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101099
  8. Habib, N., Nurlaela Wati, L., & Wardini, A. K. (2022). Determinants Of Customs Regulations Compliance In Directorate General Of Customs And Excise Audit Result. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 12(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i1.17655
  9. Hefner, J. A. (2006). Designing and Using Internal Audit Data Collection Tools for Improved Audit Metrics and Management Review A Project.
  10. Hutton Barron, F., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER-Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. In acta psychologica ELSEVIER Acta Psychologica (Vol. 93).
  11. Khatrouch, I., Belhouchet, H., Boujelbene, Y., & Mhamedi, A. El. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Football Team Selection. South Asian Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjbm.2022.v04i03.006
  12. Lele, A. (2015). Formation of an Efficient Team by Improvising Employee Selection Process Using AHP-LP for a Software Company in India. Management and Labour Studies, 40(1–2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X15601531
  13. Mahad, N. F., Mohd Azli, N. A. S., Razalli, N. A. F., & Nor Azmi, N. N. M. (2020). Condorcet voting theory is based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for project selection problems. ASM Science Journal, 13. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2020.SM26(2.7)
  14. Mock, T. J., & Samet, M. G. (n.d.). Multi-Attribute model for audit evaluation. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_proceedings
  15. Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 33, pp. 53–77). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.08.001
  16. Nichols, P. M., & Dowden, P. E. (n.d.). Maximizing stakeholder trust as a tool for controlling corruption. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3328606
  17. Ocak, M. (n.d.). Signing Auditor-Specific Characteristics And Audit Report Lag: A Research From Turkey. In The Journal of Applied Business Research (Vol. 34, Issue 2).
  18. Oktavianti, E., Komala, N., & Nugrahani, F. (2019). Simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) method on employee promotions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1193(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1193/1/012028
  19. Palmer, K. N., Ziegenfuss, D. E., & Pinsker, R. E. (2004). International knowledge, skills, and abilities of auditors/accountants: Evidence from recent competency studies. In Managerial Auditing Journal (Vol. 19, Issue 7, pp. 889–896). https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900410549411
  20. Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (2007). Chapter 6 The Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. In Handbook of Law and Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 403–454). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01006-7
  21. Pratami Putri, D. (2022). Factors Affecting Audit Report Lag in Customs and Excise Audits. Article 8 Contemporary Accounting Case Studies (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
  22. Rahmayanti, N. P., Sutrisno T., S., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2020). Effect of tax penalties, tax audit, and taxpayers awareness on corporate taxpayers’ compliance moderated by compliance intentions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.633
  23. Rum, M., Arsal, M., Khalid, A., & Awaluddin, M. (2023). The Distribution of Tax Collectability, Quality of Tax Services Efforts to Tax Coverage Ratio. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(6), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.06.202306.107
  24. Sebastian, L. (2015). Fuzzy MATLAB Approach to Construction Contractor Selection (Vol. 4). www.ijser.in
  25. Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2005). A multi-attribute model for internal auditor selection. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(8), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510619700
  26. Widodo, A. (2020). 476) Criminal Threats against the Abuse of Bonded Zone Facilities. 2(4), 465. http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/
  27. Wiedjaja, D. A., & Eriandani, R. (2021). Auditor Characteristics and Audit Report Lag: Industry Specialization and Long Tenure as Moderating Variables. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 13(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v13i2.25496
  28. Zarefar, A., Andreas, & Zarefar, A. (2016). The Influence of Ethics, Experience and Competency toward the Quality of Auditing with Professional Auditor Scepticism as a Moderating Variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 828–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.074