Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1046 Download : 680

Main Article Content

Abstract

The primary goal of this research is to elucidate the influence of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) performance on a company's overall performance. The research employs the ESG level as the independent variable for evaluation, which is the novelty of the study. The performance of the corporation is evaluated using various indicators, including financial performance (ROA), profitability (ROE), and Tobin's Q, which are regarded as reliant variables. Additionally, the study introduces the Modified by Jones Model of earnings management as a moderating factor. The analytical approach encompasses the application of multiple linear regression techniques. To ensure a representative sample, we conducted purposive sampling to select 120 observations from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange that consistently maintained their ESG index during the period spanning from 2018 to 2022, including the turbulent period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of this research reveal that the ESG index exerts a positive and statistically significant influence on ROA, ROE, and Tobin's Q. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that earnings management does not possess the capacity to moderate the relationship between ESG and company performance. The implications of this study are substantial, as it lends support to the application of legitimacy theory and agency theory in the context of ESG and corporate performance. However, it's important to acknowledge that the study's scope is limited to Indonesia, and consequently, the findings may not be directly applicable to other developing nations.

Keywords

Environmental Social Governance Corporate Performance Earnings Management Covid 19

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahcmatulloh, R., & Suranta, E. (2023). The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) on Firm Performance With Earnings Management As a Moderation: Empirical Evidence Around COVID–19. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 4(4), 846-862. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i4.937

References

  1. Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
  2. Andriani, N., & Arsjah, R. J. (2022). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Dan Esg Terhadap Manajemen Laba Yang Dimoderasi Oleh Profitabilitas. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14646
  3. Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
  4. Aqabna, S. M., Aga, M., & Jabari, H. N. (2023). Firm Performance, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Impact of Earnings Management during COVID-19: Evidence from MENA Region. Sustainability, 15(2), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021485
  5. Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
  6. Azizah, W. (2021). Covid-19 in Indonesia: Analysis of Differences Earnings Management in the First Quarter. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.1.23-32
  7. Buallay, A., Fadel, S. M., Al-Ajmi, J. Y., & Saudagaran, S. (2020). Sustainability reporting and performance of MENA banks: is there a trade-off? Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2018-0078
  8. Chancharat, N., & Kumpamool, C. (2022). Working capital management, board structure and Tobin’s q ratio of Thai listed firms. Managerial Finance, 48(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2021-0361
  9. Cheng, R., Kim, H., & Ryu, D. (2023). ESG performance and firm value in the Chinese market. Investment Analysts Journal, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2023.2218124
  10. Chininga, E., Alhassan, A. L., & Zeka, B. (2023). ESG ratings and corporate financial performance in South Africa. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2023-0072
  11. Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., Raissi, M., & Rebucci, A. (2020). Economic consequences of Covid-19: A counterfactual multi-country analysis. VoxEU.Org, Mi, 3–7. https://voxeu.org/article/economic-consequences-covid-19-multi-country-analysis
  12. De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135317
  13. Hamdan, A. M., Buallay, A. M., & Alareeni, B. A. (2017). The moderating role of corporate governance on the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm’s performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 14(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2017.087377
  14. Husada, E. V., & Handayani, S. (2021). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Esg Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Periode 2017-2019). Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.52859/jba.v8i2.173
  15. Indriani, R., Suranta, E., Midiastuty, P. P., & Bengkulu, U. (2022). Manajemen Laba Pada Setiap Tahapan Siklus Hidup Perusahaan: Suatu Pendekatan Pola Arus Kas. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v8i1.4726
  16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  17. Kamatra, N., & Kartikaningdyah, E. (2015). Effect corporate social responsibility on financial performance. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2013), 157–164.
  18. Kolsi, M. C., Al-Hiyari, A., & Hussainey, K. (2023). Does environmental, social, and governance performance mitigate earnings management practices? Evidence from US commercial banks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 20386–20401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23616-2
  19. Lelkes, Y. (2016). Winners , Losers , and the Press : The Relationship Between Political Parallelism and the Legitimacy Gap Winners , Losers , and the Press : The Relationship. Political Communication, 33(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1117031
  20. Marietza, F., Wijayanti, I. O., & Agusrina, M. (2020). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Dan Reporting Lag Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2012-2016). Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, 4(2), 109–129. https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/jrtap/article/view/1985
  21. Melinda, A., & Wardhani, R. (2020). the Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance, and Controversies on Firms’ Value: Evidence From Asia. International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, 27, 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
  22. Qiu, S. (Charles), Jiang, J., Liu, X., Chen, M. H., & Yuan, X. (2021). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93(June 2020), 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102759
  23. Qodary, H. F., & Tambun, S. (2021). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Dan Retentiom Ratio Terhadap Return Saham Dengan Nilai Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 1(2), 159–171.
  24. Ruchiatna, G., Midiastuty, P. P., & Suranta, E. (2020). Pengaruh karakteristik komite audit terhadap fraudulent financial reporting ( The effect of audit committee characteristics on fraudulent financial reporting ). Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen (Jakman), 1(4), 255–264.
  25. Sabrina, O. Z., Fachruzzaman, Midiastuty, P. P., & Suranta, E. (2020). Pengaruh Koneksitas Organ Corporate Governance, Inneffective Monitoring dan Manajemen Laba Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (The Effect of Corporate Governance, Ineffective Monitoring and Earnings Management Concept On Fraudulent Financial Reportin. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Manajemen, 1(2), 109–122.
  26. Safriani, M. N., & Utomo, D. C. (2020). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Disclosure terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 9(3), 1–11. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
  27. Suranta, E., Midiastuty, P. P., Marietza, F., & Ramadhani, F. (2014). Pengaruh Grup Bisnis Terhadap Manajemen Laba Dimoderasi Oleh Kepemilikan Saham Pengendali, Perencanaan Pajak, Dan Arus Kas Operasi.
  28. Xaviera, A., & Rahman, A. (2023). Pengaruh Kinerja ESG Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Siklus Hidup Perusahaan Sebagai Moderasi: Bukti Dari Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 226–247.
  29. Zahroh, B., & Hersugondo. (2021). Pengaruh Kinerja Environmental, Social, dan Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dengan Kekuatan CEO Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Diponegoro Journal of Management, 10(3), 1–15. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
  30. Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607

Most read articles by the same author(s)