Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 564 Download : 11315

Main Article Content

Abstract

Taxes are the largest source of state revenue to meet routine state expenditures or finance national development. In the increasingly rapid development of information technology, various innovations have been created to facilitate human life. One of them is in the service sector. To improve the quality of tax services, the government created an online tax payment service system called Electronic Samsat or E-SAMSAT. E-SAMSAT is considered a solution for tax payment services, especially motor vehicle taxes, during the COVID-19 pandemic because it is faster and there is no need to queue, such as direct tax payment services at the SAMSAT office. However, unfortunately, many taxpayers have not taken advantage of these services. This is due to the administrative system, which is considered complicated, and people's digital literacy is still low. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative to describe this research in-depth. The results of this study are public participation in the payment of Motor Vehicle Taxes through E-Samsat Services during the Covid Pandemic at the North Jakarta Samsat Office, judging from the six participation criteria presented by Mangkunegara, that has gone quite well. The community as taxpayers has participated in implementing the E-SAMSAT service system. However, unfortunately, not all people can access these services. The service procedure is quite long, and the people's digital literacy level is still low, causing the community not to be able to take full advantage of the service system.

Keywords

Participation Tax Payment Service E-SAMSAT

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Priyono, T., Wulandari, F., Rofiyanti, E., & Agustina, D. (2022). Analysis of Community Participation in Paying Motor Vehicles Tax through e-Samsat Service during Covid Pandemic at the Samsat Office in Jakarta Utara. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(2), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i2.475

References

  1. Benkraiem, R., Gaaya, S., & Lakhal, F. (2022). Corporate tax avoidance, economic policy uncertainty, and the value of excess cash: International evidence. Economic Modelling, 108, 105738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105738
  2. Beny, I. K., & Loviana Dewi, M. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemungutan Pajak Atas Transaksi Perdagangan Melalui E-Commerce Di Indonesia. Jurnal Locus Delicti, 2(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v2i2.462
  3. Bungin, B. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (B. Bungin (ed.); 2nd ed.). PT Rajagrafindo Persada. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/metodologi-penelitian-kualitatif-burhan-bungin/
  4. Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (S. Z. Qudsy (ed.); 3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1213690
  6. Darwin, M. B. P. (2010). Pajak Daerah & Restribusi Daerah (M. B. P. Darwin (ed.); I). Mitra Wacana Media. https://www.mitrawacanamedia.com/pajak-daerah-dan-restribusi-daerah
  7. Egbunike, F. C., Emudainohwo, O. B., & Gunardi, A. (2018). Tax Revenue and Economic Growth: A Study of Nigeria and Ghana. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v7i2.7341
  8. Faraj, S., Renno, W., & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100337
  9. Fujiwara, I., Kam, T., & Sunakawa, T. (2019). Sustainable international monetary policy cooperation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 106, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2019.103721
  10. García-Fernández, J., Gálvez-Ruíz, P., Fernández-Gavira, J., Vélez-Colón, L., Pitts, B., & Bernal-García, A. (2018). The effects of service convenience and perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty in low-cost fitness centers. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.003
  11. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
  12. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629
  13. Hartanti, H., Alviani, R. K., & Ratiyah, R. (2020). Pengaruh Samsat Keliling, Samsat Drive-Thru, E-Samsat Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor Pada Kantor Samsat Jakarta Timur. JURNAL ONLINE INSAN AKUNTAN, 5(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.51211/joia.v5i1.1327
  14. Herawati, L. N., & Hidayat, V. S. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Samsat Dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Kasus Pada Wajib Pajak Di Samsat Kota Cimahi). Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 10(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpak.v10n1.p50-59
  15. Karo, L. N. D., Kalangi, L., & Budiarso, N. S. (2019). Analisis Upaya Pajak, Efektivitas, dan Kontribusi Pajak Daerah di Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Pada Badan Pengelola Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah Kota Bitung. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern, 14(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.14.4.26081.2019
  16. Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related media coverage and its impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.11.001
  17. Kulathunga, K. M. M. C. B., Ye, J., Sharma, S., & Weerathunga, P. R. (2020). How Does Technological and Financial Literacy Influence SME Performance: Mediating Role of ERM Practices. Information, 11(6), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11060297
  18. Kumala, R., & Junaidi, A. (2020). Strategi Bisnis Dan Pemanfaatan Kebijakan Pajak Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Dan Era New Normal (Studi Kasus Pelaku UKM Marketplace). Prosiding Seminar STIAMI, 7(2), 98–103. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/PS/article/view/960
  19. Kuroki, M. (2022). Healthcare coverage and out-of-pocket medical expenses: evidence from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the medical expense deduction. Public Health, 205, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.022
  20. Lefstein, A., & Perath, H. (2014). Empowering teacher voices in an education policy discussion: Paradoxes of representation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.001
  21. Li, B., Liu, C., & Sun, S. T. (2021). Do corporate income tax cuts decrease labor share? Regression discontinuity evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 150(January), 102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102624
  22. Majoral, G., Gasparín, F., & Saurí, S. (2021). Application of a Tax to E-Commerce Deliveries in Barcelona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(10), 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211012412
  23. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan (3rd ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=243023
  24. Markantoni, M., Steiner, A., Meador, J. E., & Farmer, J. (2018). Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland. Geoforum, 97, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.022
  25. Marra, A., Mazzocchitti, M., & Sarra, A. (2018). Knowledge sharing and scientific cooperation in the design of research-based policies: The case of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.164
  26. Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2020). Suddenly Online: A National Survey of Undergraduates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/handle/20.500.12265/98
  27. Megayani, N. K. M., & Noviari, N. (2021). Pengaruh Program E-SAMSAT, SAMSAT Keliling, dan Kepuasan Wajib Pajak pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(8), 1936. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i08.p05
  28. Menichini, A. A. (2020). How do firm characteristics affect the corporate income tax revenue? International Review of Economics and Finance, 65(September 2019), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.10.004
  29. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
  30. Moleong, J. L. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Rosdakarya Youth.
  31. Muhaimin, M., Adzim, F., & Firmansyah, F. (2019). Analisis Potensi Pajak Reklame Terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah di Kota Makassar. Amnesty: Jurnal Riset Perpajakan, 2(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.26618/jrp.v2i2.2535
  32. Nguyen, H. T., & Darsono, S. N. A. C. (2022). The Impacts of Tax Revenue and Investment on the Economic Growth in Southeast Asian Countries. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i1.13270
  33. Octaviany, F., Rustanto, A. E., & Kartini, I. (2021). Analisis Pelayanan Pajak Dalam Meningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) di Wilayah Kota Jakarta Utara. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi, 8(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v8i1.1415
  34. Pohan, C. A. (2017). Manajemen Perpajakan: Strategi Perencanaan Pajak dan Bisnis (4th ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://ebooks.gramedia.com/books/manajemen-perpajakan
  35. Pohan, C. A. (2019). Pedoman Lengkap Pajak Internasional (2nd ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://ebooks.gramedia.com/books/pedoman-lengkap-pajak-internasional-ed-revisi
  36. Pohan, C. A. (2021). Kebijakan dan Administrasi Perpajakan Daerah di Indonesia (1st ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://ebooks.gramedia.com/books/kebijakan-dan-administrasi-perpajakan-daerah-di-indonesia
  37. Roy, S. K., Shekhar, V., Lassar, W. M., & Chen, T. (2018). Customer engagement behaviors: The role of service convenience, fairness and quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.018
  38. Sekiraqa, A., Sekiraça, E., Sekiraqa, V., & Ahmeti, S. (2021). The impact of COVID – 19 on Collecting of Tax Revenues in Kosovo. SHS Web of Conferences, 114, 01031. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111401031
  39. Selvi, S., & Ramdhan, A. (2020). Kajian Kebijakan Pemberian Insentif Pajak dalam Mengatasi Dampak Virus Corona di Indonesia Tahun 2019. Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 3(1), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.31334/transparansi.v3i1.846
  40. Șerban, A. M., Stefan, V., Stefan, V., & Moxon, D. (2020). Social Inclusion, Digitalization and Young People (No. 1). https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/47261953/053120+Study+on+SID+Web.pdf/0057379c-2180-dd3e-7537-71c468f3cf9d
  41. Shnabel, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Levin, Z. (2016). But it’s my right! Framing effects on support for empowering policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.007
  42. Silalahi, U. (2017). Metode Penelitian Sosial (A. Gunarsa (ed.); 4th ed.). Refika Aditama. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=694081
  43. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D – MPKK (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  44. Supriatiningsih, & Jamil, F. S. (2021). Pengaruh Kebijakan E-Filing, Sanksi Perpajakan dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 9(1), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v9i1.560
  45. Susanti, L., & Ery Setiawan, P. (2019). Pengaruh Layanan Samsat Corner, Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Sosialisasi Perpajakan dan Kualitas Pelayanan pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(2), 630. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v29.i02.p11
  46. Tibulca, I.-L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tax revenues in the EU. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1954967
  47. Utina, N., & Gobel, L. Van. (2020). Proses Pelayanan Pengurusan Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor di Kantor Samsat Kabupaten Bone Bolango. Publik: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Administrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik, 6(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.37606/publik.v6i1.21
  48. van de Pol, J. M., van Dijk, L., Koster, E. S., de Jong, J., & Bouvy, M. L. (2021). How does the general public balance convenience and cognitive pharmaceutical services in community pharmacy practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(3), 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.014
  49. Vlasova, V. (2021). Industry-science cooperation and public policy instruments utilization in the private sector. Journal of Business Research, 124, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.072
  50. Wulandari, D. S. (2021). Digitalisasi Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan dan Biaya Kepatuhan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Journal of Accounting Science, 5(1), 36–70. https://jas.umsida.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/1131
  51. Yang, H., Bai, Y., Guo, J., Zeng, Z., & Mi, F. (2022). Does energy tax subsidy policy promote the development of the biomass energy industry? A case of densified biomass fuel industry in China. Energy Reports, 8, 6887–6900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.080

Most read articles by the same author(s)