Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 114 Download : 130

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine how factors, namely the period of government, gender, government size, and capital expenditure, can affect the realization of the 2018–2021 government budget. This study used a saturated sample consisting of the entire population, namely all provinces in Indonesia for the 2018–2021 period, with a total of 34 provinces, so a sample of 136 was obtained. In this study, the data analysis methods used were descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression analysis, namely the standard effect model, fixed effect model, and random effect model, and hypothesis testing, namely the coefficient of determination test (R2), simultaneous test (F), and partial test (t). The data used are statements of financial position and budget realization reports obtained from the official BPK website, namely https://www.bpk.go.id/ihps. The data were analyzed using STATA v.16 software. Based on the test results, the research results obtained were that the variables of government period and gender did not affect the realization of provincial and local government budgets in Indonesia. Meanwhile, government size and capital expenditure variables affect the realization of provincial government budgets in Indonesia.

Keywords

Local Government Budget Realization Government Period Gender Government Size Capital Expenditure

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rosalina, E., Frima, R., Andriani, W., & Rm, U. A. (2023). The Impact of Resource Exploration and Capital Expenditures on the Realization of Local Government Budgets in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(4), 592-606. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i4.935

References

  1. Alt, J., Bueno De Mesquita, E., & Rose, S. (2011). Disentangling accountability and competence in elections: Evidence from U.S. term limits. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000940
  2. Andriani, W. (2023). Factors Influencing Local Government Financial Performance. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 4(3), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v4i3.3094
  3. Andriani, W., Ananto, R. P., Fitri, W. N., & Aprila, D. (2023). Corporate Policy Strategy Based on Comparison of Financial Performance Due to the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Ilomata International Journal of Tax & Accounting, 4(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i1.662
  4. Antia, M., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2010). CEO decision horizon and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.01.005
  5. Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial Management of Nagari Owned Enterprises (BUMNAG) and Its Impact on Community Welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16 i2.4461
  6. Aulia, R., & Rahmawaty, R. (2020). Pengaruh Kemakmuran Pemerintah Daerah, Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Dan Tingkat Ketergantungan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(4), 584–598. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v5i4.16826
  7. Fajarwaty Kusumawardhani, Harsini, & Sri Roserdevi Nasution. (2021). Pengarusutamaan Gender (PUG) dalam Perencanaan dan Penganggaran di Provinsi Riau Tahun 2020. Jurnal Administrasi Politik Dan Sosial, 2(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v2i3.66
  8. Fauziah, M. H. (2017). Pengaruh Faktor Keuangan dan Non Keuangan Terhadap Kesalahan Proyeksi Anggaran (Studi Pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 84, 573–580.
  9. Fitri, W. N., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial Performance of Infrastructure Companies Before and During the Covid-19. Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Bung Hatta, 18(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.37301/jmubh.v18i1.22064
  10. Funk, K. D., & Philips, A. Q. (2019). Representative Budgeting: Women Mayors and the Composition of Spending in Local Governments. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918775237
  11. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 Edisi 9 (Edisi 9).
  12. Hardani, A., Ustiawaty, J., & Utami, E. F. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif. CV Pustaka Ilmu.
  13. Jalbert, T., Jalbert, M., & Furumo, K. (2013). The Relationship Between CEO Gender, Financial Performance, And Financial Management. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 11(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v11i1.7520
  14. Jung, H. (2021). The Effect of Mayoral Gender on Gendered Budget: Evidence from South Korea. Political Studies Review, 20(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211021517
  15. Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). Ceo gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.003
  16. Mahmudi. (2019). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Edisi Keem).
  17. Mulyani, S., & Wibowo, H. (2017). Pengaruh Belanja Modal, Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Intergovernmental Revenue Dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (Kabupaten/ Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah,Tahun 2012-2015). Kompartemen, XV(1), 57–66.
  18. Nurhayati, N., & Hamzah, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 1(2), 22–34.
  19. Pahlevi, A. R., & Setiawan, D. (2017). Apakah Karakteristik Kepala Daerah Berdampak Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintahan? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 8(3), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2017.12.7074
  20. Putri, Y. M. (2018). Pengaruh Dukungan Politik, Pendapatan Daerah, Periode Jabatan Dan Belanja Daerah Terhadap Budget Forecast Errors Pemerintah Daerah Di Sumatera. Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 1–17.
  21. Raharjo, D. S. (2020). STATA 14 untuk penelitian. Kapel Press.
  22. Rakhman, F. (2019). Budget implementation in a risky environment: evidence from the Indonesian public sector. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2018-0020
  23. Safitri, A. Z., Andriani, W., & Herman, L. A. (2023). Financial Statement Integrity : What Are Things That Influence It? Jurnal Ilmiah Raflesia Akuntansi, 9(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.53494/jira.v9i1.198
  24. Setiawan, I. G. A. N. A. P., & Mahardika, D. P. K. (2019). ANALISIS PENGARUH MARKET TO BOOK VALUE, FIRM SIZE DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN LINDUNG NILAI (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Otomotif Dan Komponennya Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun 2014–2017). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v4i1.17055
  25. Tama, I. G. M. A. A., & Adi, P. H. (2018). Pengaruh Karakteristik Kepala Daerah, Ukuran Pemerintah, dan Temuan Audit terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Daerah. Perspektif Akuntansi, 1(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.24246/persi.v1i1.p91-113
  26. Tulangow, A. P., & Runtu, T. (2016). Analisis Realisasi Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah Pemerintah Kota Bitung. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(3), 564–571.
  27. Urbinas, E. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi Dan Perencanaan Anggaran Terhadap Penyerapan Anggaran Satuan Kerja Pada Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara Jayapura. Pengaruh Faktor Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi Dan Perencanaan Anggaran Terhadap Penyerapan Anggaran Satuan Kerja Pada Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara Jayapura, 59(3), 12.
  28. Wijayanti, Y., & Suryandari, D. (2020). The Effect of Regional Characteristics, Leverage, Government Complexity, BPK Audit Findings and Opinions on Local Government Financial Performance. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v9i1.22483
  29. Yunita, D. R. (2021). Faktor Manajerial Sebagai Prediktor Implementasi Anggaran di Lingkungan yang Berisiko: Peran Tekanan Anggaran Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. 1, 1–20.