Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 172 Download : 169

Main Article Content

Abstract

Family and social networks have a role in providing support to those in need. With the support from family and social networks, motivation in the training phase in Correctional Institution should be encouraged. However, people do not realize the importance of providing support for inventions, even though this can prevent a number of violations of use while undergoing training in Correctional Institution, such as escaping or other violations. In addition, Class I Correctional Institution at Sukamiskin is an Institution for corruptors in Indonesia, where stress level tends to be high. The former luxurious lives they used to have and enjoy are now the lives full of tension, worries and restlessness.  The purpose of this research is to analyze the roles of family and social networks as social control to help  them create a better situations. The method used in this study is the mixed method, a combination of both qualitative and quantitative. In this study, the sample was taken randomly, comprising 30 inmates in Class I Correctional Institution in Sukamiskin. The theory used is Hirchie's theory of social control and the stress-coping mechanism. The results of this study indicate that 66.6% of  inmates believe that the presence of family and social networks are crucial. With reference to Hirchie's theory of social control, it is concluded that discouraging situations in which convicts may commit irregularities or crimes in Correctional Institution can be prevented.

Keywords

Convict Family Social Network Correctional Institution

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mianita, H. (2023). The Role of the Family and Social Networks as Agents of Social Control in Correctional Institution Class I (A case Study in Sukamiskin, Bandung). Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(3), 390-402. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i3.820

References

  1. Aditya Dharma, I. Md. (2019). Pengembangan Buku Cerita Anak Bergambar Dengan Insersi Budaya Lokal Bali Terhadap Minat Baca Dan Sikap Siswa Kelas V Sd Kurikulum 2013. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v2i1.17321
  2. Aidt, T. S., Hillman, A. L., & Qijun, L. I. U. (2020). Who takes bribes and how much? Evidence from the China Corruption Conviction Databank. World Development, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104985
  3. Azhima, D. D., & Indrawati, E. S. (2018). Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Keluarga Dengan Subjective Well-Being Pada Narapidna Perempuan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan" X.
  4. Bales, W. D., & Mears, D. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 287–321.
  5. Buchan, J., & Morrison, K. (2020). Compromise, partnership, control: Community Justice Authorities in Scotland. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 20(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818814903
  6. Bushway, S. D., & Apel, R. (2012). A signaling perspective on employment‐based reentry programming: Training completion as a desistance signal. Criminology & public policy, 11(1), 21–50.
  7. Claire, K., & Dixon, L. (2017). The effects of Correctional Institution visits from family members on Correctional Institutioners’ well-being, Correctional Institution rule breaking, and recidivism: A review of research since 1991. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 185–199.
  8. Cochran, J. C. (2012). The ties that bind or the ties that break: Examining the relationship between visitation and Correctional Institutioner misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 433–440.
  9. Cochran, J. C., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2017). Who gets visited in Correctional Institution? Individual-and community-level disparities in inmate visitation experiences. Crime & Delinquency, 63(5), 545–568.
  10. Comfort, M. (2009). Doing time together. In Doing Time Together. University of Chicago Press.
  11. Dežman, Z. (2013). The role of the mayor - Between political vision and criminal responsibility. Lex Localis, 11(4), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.4335/11.4.955-968(2013)
  12. Dionisio, F., Faivre Le Cadre, A., & Lefèvre Ganahl, C. (2020). What Future for Serious Criminals? Evolution Psychiatrique, 85(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2019.12.007
  13. Dixey, R., Woodall, J., Folk, J. B., Stuewig, J., Mashek, D., Tangney, J. P., & Grossmann, J. (2012). The significance of ‘“the visit”’ in an English category B Correctional Institution: Views from Correctional Institutioners, Correctional Institutioners’ families and Correctional Institution staff. Community Work and Family, 15(4), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.580125
  14. Hadjimatheou, K. (2023). Using criminal histories to empower victim–survivors of domestic abuse. European Journal of Criminology, 20(3), 1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221128249
  15. Hirschel, D. (2012). The Benefits of More “Victim-Focused” Coordinated Community Responses to Intimate Partner Violence: A Critique of “The Impact of Victim-Focused Outreach on Criminal Legal System Outcomes Following Police-Reported Intimate Partner Abuse,” by Anne P. DePrince, Joanne Belknap, Jennifer S. Labus, Susan E. Buckingham, and Angela R. Gover. Violence Against Women, 18(8), 897–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212456984
  16. Horsley, F. K. (2021). The positive aspects of fire use: a grounded theory of the experiences of non-criminalised fire users. Journal of Forensic Practice, 23(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-05-2021-0028
  17. Jardine, C. (2018). Constructing and maintaining family in the context of imCorrectional Institutionment. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(1), 114–131.
  18. Jeffries, S., Rao, P., Chuenurah, C., & Fitz-Gerald, M. (2021). Extending borders of knowledge: gendered pathways to Correctional Institution in Thailand for international cross border drug trafficking. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(6), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1894263
  19. Leban, L., Cardwell, S. M., Copes, H., & Brezina, T. (2016). Adapting to Correctional Institution life: A qualitative examination of the coping process among incarcerated offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 943–969.
  20. Maxwell, S. R. (2019). Perceived threat of crime, authoritarianism, and the rise of a populist president in the Philippines. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2018.1558084
  21. Muluk, H., Umam, A. N., & Milla, M. N. (2020). Insights from a deradicalization program in Indonesian Correctional Institution: The potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12392
  22. Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012). Children’s antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 175.
  23. Mythen, G., Walklate, S., & Kemshall, H. (2013). Decentralizing risk: The role of the voluntary and community sector in the management of offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812458295
  24. Noor Laila, R., & Asyanti, S. (2016). Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Dengan Penerimaan Diri Pada Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe II.
  25. Patterson, G. T. (2013). Correctional Institutioner reentry: A public health or public safety issue for social work practice? Social Work in Public Health, 28(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2011.560822
  26. Pierce, M. B. (2015). Male inmate perceptions of the visitation experience: Suggestions on how Correctional Institution can promote inmate–family relationships. The Correctional Institution Journal, 95(3), 370–396.
  27. Pinto, R. M., Rahman, R., & Williams, A. (2014). Policy advocacy and leadership training for formerly incarcerated women: An empowerment evaluation of ReConnect, a program of the Women in Correctional Institution Project, Correctional Association of New York. Evaluation and Program Planning, 47, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.005
  28. Rambe, R. N. K. (2018a). Penerapan Strategi Index Card Match Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 25(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v25i1.237
  29. Rambe, R. N. K. (2018b). Penerapan Strategi Index Card Match Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 25(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v25i1.237
  30. Saptawan, A., Ammar, M., Erina, L., Ermanovida, E., & Alamsyah, A. (2020). Criminality and disaster: The case of forest fires in Sumatra Island, Indonesia. Disaster Advances, 13(1), 29–37. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078302733&partnerID=40&md5=a0da2b73855695bff7c57522f84806b2
  31. Sharma, R. (2013). Here and gone: Anticipation and separation effects of Correctional Institution visits on inmate infractions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812449470
  32. Siennick, S. E., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2013). Here and gone: Anticipation and separation effects of Correctional Institution visits on inmate infractions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812449470
  33. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Proneness to Shame, Proneness to Guilt, and Psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.101.3.469
  34. Toft, J., & Reierson, L. (2017). Citizenship Social Work: A Community Environmental Scan of Re-enfranchisement Social Work Supports after Felony Conviction. Journal of Policy Practice, 16(2), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2016.1214858