Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 104 Download : 173

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this study were to explore the capacity of local governments in developing transmigration areas in the decentralization era after the change in the transmigration paradigm from migration of the poor to the development of transmigration areas. This research uses a constructive qualitative case study approach. Data collection was done by means of in-depth interviews with 35 participants from echelon two and echelon three officials in Kota Tidore Kepulauan, echelon three in the provincial government and echelons three and four in the central ministry. Our research exposes that the capacity of the local government of Kota Tidore Kepulauan in developing the transmigration area has not been maximized due to unhealthy local political dynamics because each change of regional head can affect the transfer and rotation of positions, the lack of funding sources so that the dependence on the budget from the central government is very high. In addition, cross-sectoral coordination did not go well because each agency still had sectoral ego even though transmigration affairs were not only the task of the transmigration technical service but were the affairs of the local government. Even, human resource support is still very limited, while the procurement of ASN (State Civil Apparatus) must obtain approval from the central government, so local governments are experiencing difficultiesThe aims of this study were to explore the capacity of local governments in developing transmigration areas in the decentralization era after the change in the transmigration paradigm from migration of the poor to the development of transmigration areas. This research uses a constructive qualitative case study approach. Data collection was done by means of in-depth interviews with 35 participants from echelon two and echelon three officials in Kota Tidore Kepulauan, echelon three in the provincial government and echelons three and four in the central ministry. Our research exposes that the capacity of the local government of Kota Tidore Kepulauan in developing the transmigration area has not been maximized due to unhealthy local political dynamics because each change of regional head can affect the transfer and rotation of positions, the lack of funding sources so that the dependence on the budget from the central government is very high. In addition, cross-sectoral coordination did not go well because each agency still had sectoral ego even though transmigration affairs were not only the task of the transmigration technical service but were the affairs of the local government. Even, human resource support is still very limited, while the procurement of ASN (State Civil Apparatus) must obtain approval from the central government, so local governments are experiencing difficulties.

Keywords

Local Government Transmigration Development ASN

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muksin, I. (2023). Local Government Capacity in Transmigration Development, Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i2.736

References

  1. Adnan, H. R., Hidayanto, A. N., & Kurnia, S. (2021). Citizens’ or government’s will? Exploration of why indonesia’s local governments adopt technologies for open government. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011197
  2. Atherton, A. (2013). Promotion private sector development in China: the challenge of building capacity at the local level. Environtment and Planning C : Government and Policy, 31, 5–23.
  3. Baskaran, T., & Bigsten, A. (2013). Fiscal Capacity and the Quality of Government in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 45, 92–107.
  4. Bockstael, E. (2017). Critical Capacity Development: An Action Research Approach in Coastal Brazil. Wolrd Development, xx.
  5. Carpintero, S., & Helby Petersen, O. (2016). Public–private partnerships (PPPs) in local services: risk-sharing and private delivery of water services in Spain. Local Government Studies, 42(6), 958–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1204297
  6. Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. (1983). Decentralization and Development : Policy Implementation in Developing Countries. Sage Publication.
  7. Dang, T. K., Hamakers, I. J., & Arts, B. (2015). A Framework for assessing governance capacity: An illustration from Vietnam’s forestory reform. Environment and Planning C: Government, 0(0), 1–21.
  8. Francesch-Huidobro, M., Lo, C. W.-H., & Tang, S.-Y. (2012). The local environmental regulatory regime in China: change in pro-environment orientation, institutional capacity, and external political support in Guangzhou. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2493–2511.
  9. Grassi, D., & Memoli, V. (2016). Political Determinants of State Capacity in Latin America. World Development, xx.
  10. Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting Good Government Capacity Building in the Public Sectors of Developing Countries. Harvard Institute for International Development.
  11. Hlynsdóttir, E. M. (2016). Leading the locality: Icelandic local government leadership dilemma. Lex Localis, 14(4), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.4335/14.4.807-826(2016)
  12. Hugg, V. G. (2020). Public Service-Function Types and Interlocal Agreement Network Structure: A Longitudinal Study of Iowa. Urban Affairs Review, 56(4), 1293–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419843189
  13. Hutchinson, F. E. (2017). (De)centralization and the missing middle in Indonesia and Malaysia. Sojourn, 32(2), 291–335. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj32-2c
  14. Hutchison, M. L., & Jhonson, K. (2011). Capacity trust? Institutional Capacity, conflic, and Political trust in Africa, 2000-2005. Journal of Peace Research, 48(6), 737–752.
  15. Kemendari. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
  16. Lewis, B. D. (2003). Local Government Borrowing and Repayment in Indonesia: Does Fiscal Capacity Matter? Wolrd Development, 31, 1047–1063.
  17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif (Qualitative Data Analysis. UI Press.
  18. Navarro-Galera, A., Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., & Ortiz-Rodriguez, D. (2018). Enhancing sustainability transparency in local governments-An empirical research in Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072161
  19. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935
  20. Rahayu, P., Woltjer, J., & Firman, T. (2019). Water Governance in Decentralizing Urban Indonesia. Urban Studies, 00(0), 1–18.
  21. Rivenbark, W. C., Afonso, W., & Roenigk, D. J. (2018). Capital spending in local government: Providing context through the lens of government-wide financial statements. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 30(4), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2018-0053
  22. Romero-Lankao, P., Hughes, S., Rosas-Huerta, A., Borquez, R., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013). Institutional capacity for climate responses: an examination of construction and pathways in Mexico City and Santioago. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 785–805.
  23. Ryan, R., & Woods, R. (2015). Local Goverment Capacity in Australia. Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 225–248.
  24. Sarkar, M. S. K., Okitasari, M., Ahsan, M. R., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2022). Localisation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Bangladesh: An Inclusive Framework under Local Governments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710817
  25. Schmidthuber, L., Stütz, S., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Outcomes of open government: Does an online platform improve citizens’ perception of local government? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2018-0056
  26. Spoann, V., Fujiwara, T., Seng, B., & Lay, C. (2018). Municipal Solid Management: Constraints and Opportunities to Improve Capacity of Local Government Authorities of Phnom Penh Capcital. Waste Management & Research, 00(0), 1–8.
  27. Spoann, V., Fujiwara, T., Seng, B., Lay, C., & Yim, M. (2019). Assessment of public-private partnership in municipal solid waste management in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051228
  28. van Ewijk, E. (2016). Engaging Migrants in Translocal Partnerships: The Case of Dutch-Moroccan and Dutch-Turkish Municipal Partnerships. Population, Space and Place, 22(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1872
  29. Vincent, C., & Stephen, C. (2015). Local Government Capacity Building and Development: Lessons, Challengs and Opportunities. Journal of Political Science & Public Affairs, 3(1), 1–5.
  30. Yin, G., Liu, Y., & Wang, F. (2018). Emerging Chinese new towns: Local government-directed capital switching in inland China. Cities, 79, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.026