Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 575 Download : 565

Main Article Content

Abstract

Since 2021 the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology has launched the Independent Student Exchange program as part of the Merdeka Campus Program. The Independent Student Exchange Program began to open online registration in June 2021, and has now entered the program implementation stage. One of the main goals of the Independent Student Exchange Program is to explore and get to know the cultural diversity of the archipelago and make friends with fellow students from different cultural backgrounds. This study aims to analyze aspects of intercultural communication that occur in the implementation of the Independent Student Exchange Program, such as how cultural interactions among students, how each student displays their cultural identity, and how to adapt to fellow students. This research uses a qualitative approach, an exploratory paradigm, in a case study perspective. The data collection process was carried out under natural conditions in the form of observation, in-depth interviews and documentation studies. This study concludes that although there are many differences in cultural backgrounds, students try to adapt to their peers who have different cultural backgrounds. The main obstacle in intercultural communication is the language barrier, because even though both speak Indonesian, the influence of local languages is still very strong, so sometimes the same vocabulary has different meanings and meanings. The results of the study also found several cases related to stereotypes against certain ethnic groups, the existence of ethnocentrism among program participants and various difficulties in adapting to fellow program participants.

Keywords

Intercultural Communication Student Exchange Independent Campus Independent Study

Article Details

How to Cite
Yusup, E., & Gemiharto, I. (2022). Analysis of Intercultural Communication in Implementation of Independent Student Exchange Program. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v3i1.416

References

  1. Baharuddin, M. R. (2021). Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi). Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.591
  2. Baydak, A. V., Scharioth, C., & Il’yashenko, I. A. (2015). Interaction of Language and Culture in the Process of International Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.567
  3. Bohman, D. M., & Borglin, G. (2014). Student exchange for nursing students: Does it raise cultural awareness’? A descriptive, qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.11.006
  4. Chan, E. A., Liu, J. Y. W., Fung, K. H. K., Tsang, P. L., & Yuen, J. (2018). Pre-departure preparation and co-curricular activities for Students’ intercultural exchange: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Education Today, 63, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.020
  5. Dolphen, I. (2014). Learning Language and Culture through Indigenous Knowledge: A Case Study of Teaching a Minority Language (Mon) in a Majority Language (Thai) School Setting. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.236
  6. Ferine, K. F., Aditia, R., Rahmadana, M. F., & Indri. (2021). An empirical study of leadership, organizational culture, conflict, and work ethic in determining work performance in Indonesia’s education authority. Heliyon, 7(7), e07698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07698
  7. Fuadi, T. M., & Aswita, D. (2021). Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: Bagaimana Penerapan dan Kedala yang Dihadapi oleh Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Aceh. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 603–614. http://jurnal.abulyatama.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi/article/view/2051
  8. Giovannoni, F., & Xiong, S. (2019). Communication under language barriers. Journal of Economic Theory, 180, 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2018.12.009
  9. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
  10. Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629
  11. Han, H., Shu, X., & Ye, X. (2018). Conflicts and regional culture: The general features and cultural background of illegitimate housing demolition in China. Habitat International, 75, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.008
  12. Hassan, Z. M. (2014). Language Contextualisation and Culture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.282
  13. Imai, M., Kanero, J., & Masuda, T. (2016). The relation between language, culture, and thought. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.011
  14. Ivanoff, C. S., Yaneva, K., Luan, D., Andonov, B., Kumar, R. R., Agnihotry, A., Ivanoff, A. E., Emmanouil, D., Volpato, L. E. R., Koneski, F., Muratovska, I., Al-Shehri, H. A., Al-Taweel, S. M., & Daly, M. (2017). A global probe into dental student perceptions about philanthropy, global dentistry and international student exchanges. International Dental Journal, 67(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12260
  15. Jatmiko, Z. W. (2017). Strategi Komunikasi Antarbudaya yang Dilakukan Mahasiswa Asing Guna Beradaptasi di Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Airlangga, 3(1), 11. https://repository.unair.ac.id/67880/3/Sec.pdf
  16. Kil, H., Noels, K. A., Vargas Lascano, D. I., & Schweickart, O. (2019). English Canadians’ cultural stereotypes of ethnic minority groups: Implications of stereotype content for acculturation ideologies and immigration attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 70, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.03.005
  17. King, C. S. T., & Bailey, K. S. (2021). Intercultural communication and US higher education: How US students and faculty can improve. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.04.007
  18. Kristanto, Y. R. (2016). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Mahasiswa Asing. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP UNS, 1(1), 1–16. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/57480/Komunikasi-antarbudaya-mahasiswa-asing-Studi-Tentang-Kecenderungan-kecenderungan-Komunikasi-Antarbudaya-Yang-Berkembang-Di-Kalangan-Mahasiswa-Asing-Di-Surakarta
  19. Liu, N., & Zhang, Y. B. (2020). Warranting theory, stereotypes, and intercultural communication: U.S. Americans’ perceptions of a target Chinese on Facebook. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 77, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.005
  20. Lomotey, B. A., & Csajbok-Twerefou, I. (2021). A pragmatic and sociolinguistic analysis of proverbs across languages and cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.014
  21. Matera, C., & Catania, M. A. (2021). Correlates of international students’ intergroup intentions and adjustment: The role of metastereotypes and intercultural communication apprehension. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.04.011
  22. Mikhaleva, L. V., & Régnier, J.-C. (2014). Parallel Study of Native and Target-language Cultures in Foreign Language Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.122
  23. Munková, D., Stranovská, E., Fráterová, Z., & Ďuračková, B. (2013). Identity vs. Foreign Language and Culture in Production of Speech Acts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.567
  24. Nadeem, M. U., Mohammed, R., & Dalib, S. (2020). Retesting integrated model of intercultural communication competence (IMICC) on international students from the Asian context of Malaysia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.10.005
  25. Nofia, N. N. (2020). Analisis Tantangan Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Pada Perguruan Tinggi Islam Negeri di Indonesia. Jurnal Prokurasi Edukasi PRODU, 1(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15548/p-prokurasi.v1i2.3328
  26. Ou, W. A., & Gu, M. M. (2020). Negotiating language use and norms in intercultural communication: Multilingual university students’ scaling practices in translocal space. Linguistics and Education, 57, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100818
  27. Puspitasari, R., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka FISIP UPN Veteran Jawa Timur. Jurnal Dinamika Governance, 11(2), 276–292. http://ejournal.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/jdg/article/view/2539
  28. Sierra, S. (2019). Linguistic and ethnic media stereotypes in everyday talk: Humor and identity construction among friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 152, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.007
  29. Siregar, N., Sahirah, R., & Harahap, A. A. (2020). Konsep Kampus Merdeka Belajar di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.53802/fitrah.v1i1.13
  30. Sudaryanto, S., Widayati, W., & Amalia, R. (2020). Konsep Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka dan Aplikasinya dalam Pendidikan Bahasa (dan Sastra) Indonesia. Kode: Jurnal Bahasa, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v9i2.18379
  31. Susilawati, N. (2021). Merdeka Belajar dan Kampus Merdeka Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Pendidikan Humanisme. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.24036/sikola.v2i3.108
  32. Szkudlarek, B., Osland, J. S., Nardon, L., & Zander, L. (2020). Communication and culture in international business – Moving the field forward. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101126