Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 62 Download : 36

Main Article Content

Abstract

In Indonesia’s public sector, the Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) is a vital governance mechanism, and its post-COVID-19 concretization necessitates thorough examination, especially at the provincial level. Next move, given that public accountability remains paramount in governance, this study investigates SAKIP’s implementation in West Java, specifically focusing on institutional strengthening and oversight mechanisms. Furthermore, a descriptive qualitative approach was used, whereby secondary data was collected from official documents and media reports to evaluate SAKIP’s effectiveness. Consequently, the analysis reveals that the West Java Provincial Government has demonstrated significant improvements, as evidenced by consistent increases in SAKIP scores from 2019 to 2022, while the integration of robust oversight mechanisms has effectively facilitated meaningful public scrutiny and engagement. Subsequently, several key outcomes emerged, including enhanced institutional performance metrics, successful establishment of transparent oversight mechanisms, and strengthened government-public relationships. Moreover, the implications provide practical insights for policymakers while demonstrating SAKIP’s dual role as both a compliance tool and a catalyst for improved governance.

Keywords

Performance Accountability System Accountability Governance West Java

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Werang, M. L. F., Rizki, M., Yolandasari, P., & Werang, N. P. L. (2025). Revitalizing Governance: How West Java’s SAKIP Transformed Public Accountability Post-COVID-19. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i2.1614

References

  1. Abhayawansa, S., Adams, C. A., & Neesham, C. (2021). Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how governments create value. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(4), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4667
  2. Afifah, A. N., Dirgantari, N., Pratama, B. C., & Wibowo, H. (2022). Sakip-Based Public Accountability for Local Governments in Central Java Province. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(4), 1802–1820.
  3. Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301
  4. Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2021). Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1332–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659
  5. Akinyode, B. F., & Khan, T. H. (2018). Step by step approach for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v5.n3.267
  6. Bandy, G. (2013). Financial Management and Accounting in the Public Sector. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807835
  7. Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
  8. Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., Diaz-Fuentes, D., & Fernandez-Gutierrez, M. (2021). Blockchain for Public Services: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 9, 13904–13921. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052019
  9. Cordery, C., Arora, B., & Manochin, M. (2023). Public sector audit and the state’s responsibility to “leave no‐one behind”: The role of integrated democratic accountability. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(2), 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12354
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Báez, J. C. (2020). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.
  11. Danar, O. R. (2024). Digital transformation of Indonesian administration and bureaucratic system. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 16(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2024.140789
  12. Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About Research: Qualitative Methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693
  13. Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, M., & Hofmann, S. C. (2024). Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces. Global Policy, 15(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13345
  14. Gorman, L., & Ward, A. M. (2023). Accountability. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 22–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_58
  15. Grossman, G., & Slough, T. (2022). Government Responsiveness in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-112501
  16. Hanbali, L., Hannon, E., Lehtimaki, S., McNab, C., & Schwalbe, N. R. (2023). Independent monitoring and the new pandemic agreement. BMJ Global Health, 8(11), e013348–e013348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013348
  17. Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. U. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: a case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(6), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2021-0046
  18. Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2020). Network Governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351056540
  19. Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2022). Accountability and inter-organizational collaboration within the state. Public Management Review, 24(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963822
  20. Lamarque, D. (2023). Strengthening evaluation capacity in Government: Why institutionalisation matters and why it is not sufficient. Evaluation, 29(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231166981
  21. Leoni, G., Lai, A., Stacchezzini, R., Steccolini, I., Brammer, S., Linnenluecke, M., & Demirag, I. (2021). Accounting, management and accountability in times of crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2021-5279
  22. Lozano, M., Atkinson, M., & Mou, H. (2023). Democratic Accountability in Times of Crisis: Executive Power, Fiscal Policy and COVID-19. Government and Opposition, 58(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.24
  23. LÜHRMANN, A., MARQUARDT, K. L., & MECHKOVA, V. (2020). Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000222
  24. Mensah, I. K., Adams, S., & Luo, C. (2023). The moderating effect of perceived transparency and accountability on the adoption of mobile government services. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 21(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2023.127373
  25. Morte-Nadal, T., & Esteban-Navarro, M. A. (2022). Digital Competences for Improving Digital Inclusion in E-Government Services: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211070935
  26. Osborne, S. P. (2020). Public Service Logic. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009153
  27. Rahayu, S., Yudi, & Rahayu. (2020). Internal auditors role indicators and their support of good governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1751020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751020
  28. Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and Institutional Challenges on Local Governments Performance Accountability System Reform in Indonesia. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659
  29. Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business &Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690
  30. Solehudin, M. (2019). Pemprov Jabar dan Pemkot Bandung Kembali Raih Predikat A untuk SAKIP Baca artikel detiknews, “Pemprov Jabar dan Pemkot Bandung Kembali Raih Predikat A untuk SAKIP.” In detikNews.
  31. Watch, I. C. (2020). Akuntabilitas Penanganan Pandemi COVID - 19 (pp. 1–9).
  32. Wilkes, J. (2022). Reconnecting with Nature through Good Governance: Inclusive Policy across Scales. Agriculture, 12(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030382