Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 19 Download : 10

Main Article Content

Abstract

Improving public services is the primary goal of governance, which is focused on community welfare. One critical sector in enhancing the quality of public services is residential area management. This article examines the role of residential area management in supporting public service improvement, focusing on implementing the Regional Development and Housing Plan (RP3KP) in Tana Tidung Regency. The study aims to analyze the contribution of RP3KP to public service improvement in the housing sector and identify key success factors and challenges in its implementation. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data was collected through policy document analysis, interviews with relevant stakeholders, and field observations. The results indicate that RP3KP has positively contributed to improving the quality of public services in the housing sector through integrated and participatory planning. The successful implementation of RP3KP is influenced by policy synergy between central and local governments, active community involvement in planning, and effective coordination among local government agencies. However, this study also identifies several challenges, such as limited resources, inadequate spatial data, and difficulties in cross-sectoral coordination. The implementation of RP3KP can potentially become a strategic model for optimizing public services in the housing sector, provided it is supported by consistent policies, efficient resource management, and enhanced institutional capacity. Practical recommendations for local governments include strengthening residential area management as an integral part of inclusive and sustainable public services.

Keywords

service public , management area settlements , RP3KP, administration public , development sustainable

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
trenggana, widaningsih, Muchtar, & Pundenswari, P. (2025). Enhancing Public Services Through Residential Area Management: A Public Administration Study on the Implementation of the Regional Development and Housing Plan (RP3KP): RP3KP. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 201 - 219. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i1.1536

References

  1. Ahmad, T., & Sarkar, M. (2020). Smart Cities: A Framework for Sustainable Development. Journal of Urban Management, 9(2), 126-136. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. jum. 2020. 03. 002
  2. Basu, R. (2019). Public Policy in the Age of Data-Driven Decision Making. Springer.
  3. Davies, J. S., & Imbroscio, D. L. (2021). Critical Urban Policy: Exploring Governance Challenges in Neoliberal Cities. Urban Studies, 58(5), 915-933. https://doi. org/10. 1177/0042098020918034
  4. Eryilmaz, B., & Birtek, E. (2022). Governance Challenges in Decentralized Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 419-430. https://doi. org/10. 1111/puar. 13361
  5. Fischer, F., & Torgerson, D. (2020). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Routledge.
  6. Frey, B. S. (2000). Institutions and Public Services: A Governance Perspective. Springer.
  7. Giddens, A. (2023). The Politics of Climate Change: Challenges for Public Policy. Polity Press.
  8. Harris, M., & Bitonti, A. (2022). Lobbying and Public Policy: An International Perspective. Public Policy and Administration, 37(4), 387-405. https://doi. org/10. 1177/09520767211052751
  9. Ibrahim, M. (2012). Basic Principles of Management Sustainable Natural Resources. Publisher University of Indonesia.
  10. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65. https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1540-6210. 2004. 00346. x
  11. Janicke, M. (2019). The Role of Innovation in Green Economy Policies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(4), 247-259. https://doi. org/10. 1002/eet. 1842
  12. Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 29-62). Westview Press.
  13. Kapoor, R. (2021). The Impact of Collaborative Governance on Public Service Delivery. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 294-308. https://doi. org/10. 1093/jopart/muaa040
  14. Kuncoro, M. (2003). Research Methods for Business & Economy (3rd ed.). Erlangga.
  15. Leonard, P. (2013). Public Policy and Administration. Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Mardiasmo. (2009). Public Sector Accounting. Andi.
  17. McConnell, A. (2010). Policy Success, Policy Failure and Gray Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362. https://doi. org/10. 1017/S0143814X10000042
  18. Nakamura, A., & Tamura, M. (2020). Local Government Finance in Times of Crisis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 171-185. https://doi. org/10. 1080/23276665. 2020. 1756169
  19. National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas). (2017). Long-term Development Plan National Middle School 2015-2019. Bappenas.
  20. Ongaro, E. (2019). Public Administration and the Modern State: Assessing Trends and Impact. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2021). Institutional Theory in Public Policy and Administration. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  22. Regulation Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Plan Development and Construction of Housing and Residential Areas (RP3KP). Regulation Government Regulation No. 41 of 2015.
  23. Roberts, A., & Rizzo, G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Public Affairs, 23(1), e2725. https://doi. org/10. 1002/pa. 2725
  24. Rustandi, T. (2015). Collaboration Between Government and Non-Governmental Institutions in Housing Governance. Journal Public Administration, 12(2), 178–191.
  25. Sinambela, S. (2012). Management Public Services. Earth of Literature.
  26. Smith, L. R., & Smith, D. J. (2011). Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation. Sage Publications.
  27. Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management, Public Administration and Public Service Reform. Public Administration, 84(3), 537-558. https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1467-9299. 2006. 00601. x
  28. Susanto, E. (2017). Methodology Social and Economic Research. Ghalia Indonesia.
  29. Sutomo, S. (2016). Public Policy and Public Services in Indonesia. LP3ES.
  30. Wibisono, B. (2015). Public Policy and Regional Development. Alfabeta.
  31. . Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Effect of Stakeholder Participation in Public Infrastructure Projects. Project Management Journal, 55(1), 55-70. https://doi. org/10. 1177/875697283023660