Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 107 Download : 27

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Regional Asset Management policy in the Central Buton Regency Government by focusing on the Matland Policy Implementation Model, which includes policy accuracy, implementation accuracy, target accuracy and environmental accuracy. The research method used is qualitative with data collection techniques through interviews, observations, and documentation. Data analysis techniques are carried out through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study show several important findings. First, positive policy accuracy, with Central Buton Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2018 formulated to overcome problems and support governance. Second, target accuracy is achieved, with appropriate interventions and low ambiguity, increasing the chances of successful implementation. Regional Asset Management Officials show a good response and readiness to implement the policy. Third, environmental accuracy shows positive dynamics through interactions between institutions and community involvement. Fourth, implementation accuracy is still not effective, as seen from the limited combination between the government and the community/private sector and the lack of privatization and the absence of contracting out. In addition, there are problems such as uncertified land and the low number of information boards. In conclusion, the accuracy of policies, accuracy of targets, and accuracy of the environment have been effective, but the accuracy of implementation has not been effective.

Keywords

Evaluation of Public Policy Effectiveness of Policy Implementation Management of Regional Property Central Buton Regency

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Faizu, A. H., Rahmawati, & Ramadhan, S. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regional Asset Management Policies: A Case Study of Central Buton Regency . Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i1.1495

References

  1. Aditia, D., Nasution, D., Supraja, G., & Damanik, A. F. (2022). PENGUKURAN EFEKTIVITAS PENGELOLAAN BARANG MILIK DAERAH DALAM DINAS PERUMAHAN & KAWASAN PERMUKIMAN KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG (Vol. 16).
  2. Ahlers, A. L., & Schubert, G. (2015). Effective Policy Implementation in China’s Local State. Modern China, 41(4), 372–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700413519563
  3. Anderson, J. E. (2014). Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Cengage Learning.
  4. Aprilia, I., Syaukat, Y., Faroby, A., Optimisasi, F., Aset, M., Daerah, T., Mewujudkan, D., Provinsi, P., Jakarta, D., & Falatehan, A. F. (2018). OPTIMISASI MANAJEMEN ASET TETAP DAERAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN GOOD GOVERNANCE DI PEMERINTAH PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA Optimization of Fix Asset Management in Achieving Good Governance at The Province of DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah, 10, 1–17.
  5. Chriqui, J. F., Asada, Y., Smith, N. R., Kroll-Desrosiers, A., & Lemon, S. C. (2023). Advancing the science of policy implementation: a call to action for the implementation science field. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 13(11), 820–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad034
  6. Christensen, T., & Lagreid, P. (2017). THE ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK TO ACCOUNTABILITY AND WELFARE STATE REFORMS IN EUROPE. Routledge.
  7. Damanik, Y. T., & Marom, A. (2016). Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Policy Through Skills Training Program in Mangunharjo Village, Tembalang District. Semarang City.Journal Of Public Policy And Management Review, 1–11.
  8. Drucker, J., Funderburg, R., Merriman, D., & Weber, R. (2020). Do local governments use business tax incentives to compensate for high business property taxes? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103498
  9. Dwijowijoto, R. N. (2003). Kebijakan publik : formulasi, implementasi, dan evaluasi. Elex Media Komputindo.
  10. Falk, M. T., & Svensson, R. (2020). Evaluation criteria versus firm characteristics as determinants of public R&D funding. Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa032
  11. Fitriyani, E., & Yuliansyah, R. (2016). Analisis Pengelolaan Aset Tetap Pemerintah Daerah Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomer 19 Tahun 2016.
  12. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  13. Gao, Y., Zang, L., & Sun, J. (2019). Are Chinese college graduates satisfied with serving as village officials? An evaluation with nationwide survey data. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1432097
  14. Gollata, J. A. M., & Newig, J. (2017). Policy implementation through multi-level governance: analysing practical implementation of EU air quality directives in Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 1308–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314539
  15. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  16. Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Willardsen, K. (2014). The millage rate offset and property tax revenue stability. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 46(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.04.004
  17. Khanal, P. (2013). Community participation in schooling in Nepal: A disjunction between policy intention and policy implementation? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756390
  18. Lemishko, O. (2018). Tax policy tools used to stimulate agriculture: Their implementation and effectiveness. Economic Annals-XXI, 167(9–10), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V167-04
  19. Liu, Y., Gou, L., Guo, Z., Wu, Z., He, Q., Feng, H., & Hu, M. (2023). Evaluation of the implementation effect of hepatitis C medical insurance reimbursement policy in China: A RWS based on medical institutions. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072493
  20. Mamu, A., & Allorante, A. I. (2020). Policy model implementation for village community empowerment in Wajo Regency. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(12), 129–139. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079759034&partnerID=40&md5=7efe1d8dc9f0e218174257a2064c5ae3
  21. Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah (Mardiasmo, Ed.; III). ANDI.
  22. Markhayeva, B., Ibrayev, A. S., Beisenova, M., Serikbayeva, G., & Arrieta-López, M. (2023). Green Banking Tools for the Implementation of a State’s Environmental Policy: Comparative Study. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.14.1(65).15
  23. Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242
  24. Mechanic, D. (1978). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. By Eugene Bardach. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977. Pp. xi + 323. $17.95.). American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1398–1399. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2307/1954568
  25. Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif (Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  26. Nilla, C. Z. (2022). ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN BARANG MILIK DAERAH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH (Studi Pada Kabupaten Sarmi). Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit & Aset, 5(1), 1–12.
  27. Nudzor, H. P. (2014). An analytical review of education policy- making and implementation processes within the context of “decentralized system of administration” in Ghana. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014530885
  28. Ode Herman, L., Didi, L., & Abidin, Z. (2023). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Aset pada Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Buton. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 12(3), 116–125. https://ejournal.lppmunidayan.ac.id/index.php/administratio/
  29. Olowosegun, A., Moyo, D., & Gopinath, D. (2021). Multicriteria evaluation of the quality of service of informal public transport: An empirical evidence from Ibadan, Nigeria. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(4), 1518–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.08.002
  30. Patrick, C., & Mothorpe, C. (2017). Demand for new cities: Property value capitalization of municipal incorporation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 67, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.09.002
  31. Pradhan, N. S., Fu, Y., Zhang, L., & Yang, Y. (2017). Farmers’ perception of effective drought policy implementation: A case study of 2009–2010 drought in Yunnan province, China. Land Use Policy, 67, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.051
  32. Prasetyawan, A., Sari, M., & Asmara, A. (2021). Peran Keterlibatan Masyarakat dalam Keberhasilan Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 9(2), 101–115.
  33. Rahman, A. K. (2020). Analisis Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah Pada Kantor Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Provinsi Riau. UIN Suska Riau.
  34. Shi, X., Fan, Z., & Gao, J. (2022). Implementation Evaluation and Sustainable Development of China’s Religious Charity Policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031656
  35. Sihombing, F. D., & Bangun, M. (2022). OMBUDSMAN Policy Evaluation in Improving Public Services in North Sumatra.JOURNAL. MESSAGE COMMUNICATION, 11(1), 23–33.
  36. Sugiyono. (2013). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R&d (19th ed.). Alfabeta.
  37. Sumardi, I. A., & Muchlis, M. (2017). ANALISIS PENGELOLAAN ASET TETAP PEMERINTAH DAERAH BERDASARKAN PERATURAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.
  38. Tamsir, S. H. (2018). Analisis Pengelolaan Aset Daerah pada Biro Pengelolaan Barang Dan Aset Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
  39. Thomas Falk, M., & Svensson, R. (2020). Evaluation criteria versus firm characteristics as determinants of public R&D funding. Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa032
  40. Tresiana, N., & Duadji, N. (2023). CAN THE POLICY ENVIRONMENT IMPROVE THE POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE? Public Administration Issues, 5, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-5-69-90
  41. UNESCAP. (2009). What is Good Governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 1–3. www.unescap.org/pdd
  42. Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
  43. Zhang, Y. (2017). Family or Money? The False Dilemma in Property Dispossession in Shanghai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12455