Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 24 Download : 22

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mangrove forests are important resources that provide various ecosystem services ecologically, economically, socially, and culturally. However, the utilisation of mangrove ecosystems often faces management conflicts. Conflicts can occur between residents in the mangrove area or between agencies and levels of authority. The diversity of governance from various decentralised, connected and functionally different layers implies a complex system. The polycentric model is one approach to addressing the system's complexity. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques using interviews and observations. The aim is to examine the recognition of residents and the government for local community initiatives. This study found several essential things. First, the context of authority over the mangrove location by supra-village agencies, but in several decades, it has become a conservation and management area for residents. Second, recipients of ecosystem services and their utilisation involve residents from outside the administrative boundaries of the village. Third, cross-sector and level agreements for recognising mangrove ecosystem management initiatives based on local community wisdom. The model of recognition and autonomy given to local communities by higher authorities is the basis for sustainable polycentric governance of mangrove ecosystems. De facto autonomy includes four aspects, including: autonomy in decision-making, formal recognition, cross-actor collaboration, and control over access to resources.

Keywords

Recognition Polycentric Mangrove Authority Sustainable

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Peten, Y. Y. P., Sius, K. T., Hadi, N. J., Dau, A., & Ratumakin, P. A. K. (2024). Recognition of Local Communities: A Polycentric Model of Policy Management of Mangrove Ecosystems . Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(4), 1248-1260. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i4.1423

References

  1. Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027
  2. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
  3. Bixler, R. P. (2014). From Community Forest Management to Polycentric Governance: Assessing Evidence from the Bottom Up. Society and Natural Resources, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.840021
  4. BPS. (2024). Produksi Perikanan Tangkap di Perairan Umum Menurut Komoditas Utama. Https://Webapi.Bps.Go.Id.
  5. Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
  6. Creswell, J. , W., & Creswell, J. , D. (2018). Qualitative Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  7. da Silveira, A. R., & Richards, K. S. (2013). The Link Between Polycentrism and Adaptive Capacity in River Basin Governance Systems: Insights from the River Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.754687
  8. Dixon, J. A. (2001). Valuation of Mangroves. Trops Coast Area Mgt, 4(3).
  9. Gatto, A., & Drago, C. (2020). A taxonomy of energy resilience. Energy Policy, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111007
  10. Giffinger, R., & Suitner, J. (2015). Polycentric Metropolitan Development: From Structural Assessment to Processual Dimensions. European Planning Studies, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.905007
  11. Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., Nooteboom, S., & Bergsma, E. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
  12. Marshall, G. R. (2009). Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance. Ecological Economics, 68(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.008
  13. Marshall, G. R. (2015, December). Polycentricity, subsidiarity and adaptive efficiency. International Workshop on Polycentricity, Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.
  14. Development, Indiana University Bloomington, December 14–17.
  15. Mcginnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2012). Reflections on vincent ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x
  16. Oakerson, R. J., & Parks, R. B. (2011). The Study of Local Public Economies: Multi-organizational, Multi-level Institutional Analysis and Development. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00400.x
  17. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
  18. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
  19. Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford University Press.
  20. Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2008). Embracing watershed politics. In Embracing Watershed Politics. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-4130
  21. Selan, C. , W., Un, P., & Rammang, N. (2021). Kajian Terhadap Pemanfaatan Hutan Mangrove Oleh Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Desa Tanah Merah, Kecamatan Kupang Tengah, Kabupaten Kupang). Jurnal Wana Lestari, 4(1), 64–73.
  22. Setyawan, A. D., & Winarno, K. (2006). Conservation problems of mangrove ecosystem in coastal area of Rembang Regency, Central Java. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d070214
  23. Sofian, A., Harahab, N., & Marsoedi, M. (2001). Kondisi dan Manfaat Langsung Ekosistem Hutan Mangrove Desa Penunggul Kecamatan Nguling Kabupaten Pasuruan. El–Hayah, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/elha.v2i2.2208
  24. Thiel, A. (2016). The polycentricity approach and the research challenges confronting environmental governance. THESys Discussion Paper No. 2016-1, . Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Pp. 1-27 . edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/thesysdiscpapers.
  25. van Zeben, J. (2019). Polycentricity. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. Routledge.