Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 17 Download : 17

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of hedonism lifestyle on students' social relationships at SMA Negeri 4 Binjai. The hedonism lifestyle, which focuses on the search for pleasure and instant gratification through the consumption of luxury goods and participation in high-cost social activities, has become an increasingly common phenomenon among teenagers. This research used a qualitative approach with an analytical descriptive method, involving observation, interviews and documentation of students, subject teachers, counseling teachers and school principals. The results showed that the hedonism lifestyle has a significant impact on the dynamics of students' social relationships. Students who follow this lifestyle tend to form exclusive social groups based on economic status, which triggers feelings of injustice and jealousy among students. The hedonistic lifestyle distracts students from academic achievement and other positive activities, reduces the quality of more meaningful interpersonal relationships, and increases excessive consumptive behavior. The study also found that family economic conditions, the influence of social media, and the role of peers are the main factors that encourage the adoption of a hedonistic lifestyle among students. To overcome this negative impact, the study recommends improving character education programs in schools, the active role of parents in teaching wise economic values, as well as students' efforts in developing awareness of time management and priorities.

Keywords

Hedonism Lifestyle Social Interactions Students

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Damanik, N. S. B., & Dora, N. (2024). Impact of Hedonistic Lifestyle on Social Interaction among High School Students: A Case Study in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 866-882. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i3.1284

References

  1. Alaassar, A., Mention, A.-L., & Aas, T. H. (2020). Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators: The case of regulatory sandboxes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120257
  2. Arul Rajan, K. (2020). Influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivation on impulse and rational buying behavior in online shopping. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 23(2), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2020.1736326.
  3. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
  4. Cahyaning Putri Amelia Pratiwi. (2023). Perspektif Psikologi Mengenai Hedonisme Korelasi Antara Kehidupan Hedonisme Menurut Pandangan Filsafat dengan Perkembangan Mental Masyarakat Indonesia Menuju Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, January, 1–7.
  5. Cahyono, K. E. (2019). Pengaruh Hedonic Value Dan Utilitarian Value Terhadap Impulse Buying Di Mediasi Oleh Shopping Life Style Pada Industri Kulit Sidoarjo. BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management and Accounting Journal, 16(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.30651/blc.v16i2.3135
  6. Hong, N. (2022). Digital-Media-Based Interaction and Dissemination of Traditional Culture Integrating Using Social Media Data Analytics. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5846451
  7. Hussain, T., Abbas, J., Wei, Z., Ahmad, S., Xuehao, B., & Gaoli, Z. (2021). Impact of urban village disamenity on neighboring residential properties: Empirical evidence from nanjing through hedonic pricing model appraisal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000645
  8. Irawan, S. B. (2019). Potret Gaya Hidup Hedonis di Kalangan Mahasiswa. Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 106.
  9. Jannah, R. (2021). Bentuk-Bentuk Gaya Hidup Hedonisme Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Uin Ar-Raniry (Studi Deskriptif Analisis Mahasiswa Prodi Bki). Skripsi.
  10. Jennyya, V. (2021). Gaya Hidup Hedonisme Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Jurnal Holistik, 14(3), 1–6. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/holistik/article/view/34482/32374
  11. Kaczmarek, L. D. (2017). Hedonic Motivation. In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–3). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_524-1.
  12. Ladefoged, T. N., Gemmell, C., McCoy, M., Jorgensen, A., Glover, H., Stevenson, C., & O’Neale, D. (2019). Social network analysis of obsidian artefacts and Māori interaction in northern Aotearoa New Zealand. PLoS ONE, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212941
  13. Lexy, & Moleong. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Lin, C. A., Crowe, J., Pierre, L., & Lee, Y. (2021). Effects of Parasocial Interaction. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 8–24.
  15. Lundgren, L., Crippen, K. J., & Bex II, R. T. (2022). Social Media Interaction as Informal Science Learning: a Comparison of Message Design in Two Niches. Research in Science Education, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09911-y
  16. Malley, G. S., & Gorenflo, L. J. (2023). Shifts in the conflict-coexistence continuum: Exploring social-ecological determinants of human-elephant interactions. PLoS ONE, 18(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274155
  17. Mondémé, C. (2022). Why study turn-taking sequences in interspecies interactions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12295
  18. Rahayu, F. S., Setiyowati, E., & ... (2021). Gambaran Sikap Sosial Dalam Pergaulan Siswa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Etnis Kelas Viii Di Smp Santa Maria Fatima Jakarta Timur. INSIGHT: Jurnal Bimbingan …, 38–43.
  19. Ribeiro Coimbra, R., Brito, C. M., & Oliveira Sampaio, D. (2023). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations and their relationship with cultural dimensions, life satisfaction and the attributes of supermarkets: An international study on consumer behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2202024.
  20. Romero, S., Fardoun, H. M., Penichet, V. M. R., Lozano, M. D., & Gallud, J. A. (2021). Analysis of online social interactions based on positive reinforcement social networks in a k-12 geometry class. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311545
  21. Rustan, A. S. (2021). Digital Communication and Social Media Interaction to Improve the Academic Quality of Islamic Higher Education Lecturers. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 144–169. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85124535495&partnerID=40&md5=7d765b6c004b1143a7cddb63c6d40e62
  22. Salim. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Haidir, Ed.). Cita Pustaka Media.
  23. Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2020). The Influence of Hedonistic Lifestyle on Social Interaction Among High School Students: A Case Study in Urban Areas. Journal of Adolescent Psychology.
  24. Strzelecka, M., Nisbett, G. S., & Woosnam, K. M. (2017). The hedonic nature of conservation volunteer travel. Tourism Management, 63, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.022
  25. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta CV.
  26. van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Social Interaction Location Choice: A Latent Class Modeling Approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(5), 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.924726
  27. Vila-López, N., & Küster-Boluda, I. (2018). Commercial versus technical cues to position a new product: Do hedonic and functional/healthy packages differ? Social Science and Medicine, 198, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.018
  28. Yitayew, A., Yigezu, Y. A., Kassie, G. T., Deneke, T. T., Haile, A., Hassen, H., & Rischkowsky, B. (2019). Identification of strategies to improve goat marketing in the lowlands of Ethiopia: a hedonic price analysis. Applied Economics, 51(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1490693
  29. Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Tang, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Conceptualizing perceived affordances in social media interaction design. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311330656
  30. Zou, B., Guan, X., Shao, Y., & Chen, P. (2023). Supporting Speaking Practice by Social Network-Based Interaction in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Language Learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042872