Main Article Content
Abstract
Agroforestry in North Kalimantan offers a promising avenue for balancing community livelihoods with carbon sequestration, crucial for the REDD+ initiatives. This paper examines the potential of agroforestry in North Kalimantan to support the REDD+ program, addressing both environmental sustainability and socio-economic development. Through field observations and interviews across four regencies and one city in North Kalimantan province, various agroforestry practices were identified, including improved fallows, alley cropping, scattered trees on cropland, living fences, and silvofishery. Challenges such as cultivation practices, post-harvest processing, market access, and financing were also explored. Three potential agroforestry models were proposed to enhance carbon capture while promoting local economic resilience. The paper underscores the importance of further research and community involvement to refine and expand these agroforestry approaches, offering hope for both local prosperity and global carbon reduction efforts.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- BPS Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. (2022). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi Kalimantan Utara 2022.
- BPS Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. (2023). Provinsi Kalimantan Utara Dalam Angka 2023.
- Brandt, R., & Staiss, C. (2019). Meningkatkan Sistem Agroforestri Berkelanjutan: Pembelajaran dari Kegiatan Agroforestri di Kabupaten Malinau (Kalimantan Utara) dan Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu (Kalimantan Barat). FORCLIME.
- Evizal, R., & Prasmatiwi, F. E. (2021). Pilar dan model pertanaman berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Galung Tropika, 10(1), 126–137.
- Foresta, H. de, Somarriba, E., Temu, A., Boulanger, D., Feuily, H., & Gauthier, M. (2015). Towards the assessment of trees outside forests. https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/7868
- Hairiah, K., Dewi, S., Agus, F., Ekadinata, A., Rahayu, S., Van Noordwijk, M., & Velarde, S. (2011). Measuring Carbon stocks across land use systems: A manual (Part A). In Measuring Carbon Stocks Across Land Use Systems: A Manual.
- Harvey, C. A., Tucker, N. I., & Estrada, A. (2004). Live fences, isolated trees, and windbreaks: Tools for conserving biodiversity in fragmented tropical landscapes. Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes, 261–289.
- Jose, S. (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforestry Systems, 76, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
- Joshi, L., Sharma, N., Ojha, P., Khatri, D., Pradhan, R., Karky, B., Pradhan, U., & Karki, S. (2010). Moving beyond REDD: Reducing emissions from all land uses in Nepal. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Moving-beyond-REDD%3A-reducing-emissions-from-all-in-Joshi-Sharma/f6392ad2c44c07642991103cc18bf1f443473cf8
- Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, P. (2011). Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: Opportunities and challenges. advances in agroforestry 8. Springer Science and Business Media.
- Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An Introduction to Agroforestry. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1608-4
- Nair, P., Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, V. (2009). Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200800030
- Noordwijk, M. van, Bayala, J., Hairiah, K., Lusiana, B., Muthuri, C., Khasanah, N., & Mulia, R. (2014). Agroforestry solutions for buffering climate variability and adapting to change. Climate Change Impact and Adaptation in Agricultural Systems, 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780642895.0216
- Oelbermann, M. (2002). Linking carbon inputs to sustainable agriculture in Canadian and Costa Rican agroforestry systems [PhD Thesis, University of Guelph]. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/handle/10214/22460
- Peichl, M., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., Huss, J., & Abohassan, R. A. (2006). Carbon Sequestration Potentials in Temperate Tree-Based Intercropping Systems, Southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 66(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-0361-8
- Pusat Pengendalian Pembangunan Ekoregion Kalimantan. (2016). Daya Dukung Jasa Ekosistem Budaya Rekreasi dan Ekowisata Teluk Balikpapan. Balikpapan: Pusat Pengendalian Pembangunan Ekoregion Kalimantan.
- Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Nair, V. D., Mohan Kumar, B., & Showalter, J. M. (2010). Chapter Five—Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry Systems. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 108, pp. 237–307). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08005-3
- Subagyo, H., Suharta, N., & Siswanto, A. B. (2000). Tanah-tanah pertanian di Indonesia. In Sumberdaya Lahan Indonesia dan Pengelolaannya (pp. 21–65). Pusat Penelitian Tanah dan Agroklimat. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Departemen Pertanian.
- Sutrisno, A., Kartodihardjo, H., Darusman, D., & Nugroho, B. (2011). JENIS VEGETASI DAN KARAKTERISTIK LAHAN DI KAWASAN HUTAN LINDUNG PULAU TARAKAN. 2.
- Thevathasan, N. V., & Gordon, A. M. (2004). Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. In P. K. R. Nair, M. R. Rao, & L. E. Buck (Eds.), New Vistas in Agroforestry (Vol. 1, pp. 257–268). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_18
- Torres, A. B., Marchant, R., Lovett, J. C., Smart, J. C., & Tipper, R. (2010). Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation. Ecological Economics, 69(3), 469–477.
- Tranchina, M., Reubens, B., Frey, M., Mele, M., & Mantino, A. (2024). What challenges impede the adoption of agroforestry practices? A global perspective through a systematic literature review. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00993-w
- Uwera, M., Mugunga, C., & Mukangango, M. (2022). Assessing Agroforestry Species, Practices, Uses, and Tree Diversity in Two Contrasting Agro-Ecological Zones of Rwanda. Forestist, 73. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2022.22048
- Verchot, L., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S., Tomich, T., Ong, C., Alain, A., Mackensen, J., Bantilan, C., Anupama, K., & Palm, C. (2007). Climate change: Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. J Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change, 12, 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6
- Widianto, N. W., & Suprayogo, D. (2003). Pengelolaan dan Pengembangan Agroforestri.
- Zomer, R., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., Place, F., Van Noordwijk, M., & Xu, J. (2014). Trees on farms: An update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio-ecological characteristics.
- Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodová, L. (2020). How a participatory budget can support sustainable rural development-lessons from Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072620
- Blomley, T., Edwards, K., Kingazi, S., Lukumbuzya, K., Mäkelä, M., & Vesa, L. (2017). When community forestry meets REDD+: has REDD+ helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania? Journal of Eastern African Studies, 11(3), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2017.1356623
- Errico, S. (2016). Opportunities and Challenges to Strengthen Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Livelihoods in the Context of REDD+: A Study of REDD+ Implementation in Vietnam. International Forestry Review, 18(4), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816820127523
- Evans, K., Murphy, L., & De Jong, W. (2014). Global versus local narratives of REDD: A case study from Peru’s Amazon. Environmental Science and Policy, 35, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.013
- Guerra, M. C. (2002). La Tassazione Dei Redditi Finanziari Nel Disegno Di Legge Delega Proposto Dal Governo. Politica Economica, 18(3), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1429/7344
- Nair, P., Hajela, A., & Munoth, N. (2022). THE ROLE OF BUILT HERITAGE IN SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT-KEY FACTORS IN SPATIAL PLANNING OF RURAL AREAS. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 22(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.35782/JCPP.2022.3.09