Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the strategic and priority programs of the Indonesian government is the Family Hope Program (PKH) under the Ministry of Social Affairs. PKH itself is a program designed to alleviate poverty with poverty levels ranging from 0% to 10%. There is a PKH social assistant who is a program implementer with the function of carrying out socialization, validating data, verifying commitment to recipients of PKH social assistance in education, health, and social welfare services, updating data, facilitating, mediating and advocating to receive complementary program assistance, and hold family capacity building meetings (P2K2). This research uses library research through a methodology that combines the characteristics of various scientific sources accurately and validly to analyze facts by taking previous literature and reporting new facts and analysis. Primary, secondary, and tertiary materials to process and analyze data by describing and combining it so that it is presented in a journal manuscript. Data shows that the family capacity building meetings (P2K2) held every month by PKH social assistants for beneficiary families (KPM) who are members of groups in each assisted area receive a good response because KPMs receive non-formal education from health and Nutrition Module, ModuleEducation and Child Care, Family Financial Management Module, Child Protection Module, Social Welfare Module, and Prevention and TreatmentStanting. 6 Modules that are provided continuously every month can increase positive practices and then gradually change the behavior of beneficiary families. The Hope Family Programme in Indonesia will be a model for how to develop the capacity of people in different countries by means of meetings to enhance the ability of families. (P2K2).

Keywords

Improvement Knowledge P2K2 PKH

Article Details

How to Cite
Umasugi, M., & Adam, M. D. H. (2024). Increasing Knowledge for Social Assistance Recipients Through Family Development Sessions (FDS) of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 540-553. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i2.1147

References

  1. Adi, I. R. (2015). Social welfare. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  2. Alfina, P., & Yusanti. (2020). The Influence of Lifestyle, Spiritual Intelligence and Gender on Family Financial Management Behavior. Jakarta.
  3. Asri, D. H., & C.P, C. (2012). Normal Childbirth Care. Yogyakarta.
  4. Baroroh, I. M. (2021). Textbook of Nutrition in Reproductive Health. In M. N. PT (Ed.), Nasya Expanding Management: Pekalongan (1st ed.).
  5. Broersma, L., Edzes, A. J. E., & van Dijk, J. (2013). Have dutch municipalities become more efficient in managing the costs of social assistance dependency? Journal of Regional Science, 53(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2012.00762.x
  6. Cheng, T. C., & Lo, C. C. (2018). Do social work education, job description, and cultural competence foster child-welfare caseworkers’ therapeutic alliances? Child and Family Social Work, 23(3), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12434
  7. Fusarelli, L. D. (2015). Child Welfare, Education, Inequality, and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(5), 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1087779
  8. Gatot S. (2013). Debt and Receivable Agreement. Jakarta.
  9. Indonesian Ministry of Health. (2022). Reducing Stunting is the Government’s Focus. Access onhttps://www.kemkes.go.id/article/print/18050800004/penurunan-stunting-jadi-focus- government.html.
  10. Jones, R., Haardörfer, R., Ramakrishnan, U., Yount, K. M., Miedema, S., & Girard, A. W. (2019). Women’s empowerment and child nutrition: The role of intrinsic agency. SSM - Population Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100475
  11. Kurniawan, P. (2020). The Influence of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behavior at Pt. Indonesian Madom. Journal: Madani, 3(2), 186–195.
  12. Lankarani, K. B., Honarvar, B., Shahabi, S., Zarei, F., Behzadifar, M., Hedayati, M., Fardid, M., Rafiee, F., Martini, M., & Nejad, S. R. (2023). The challenges of urban family physician program over the past decade in Iran: a scoping review and qualitative study with policy-makers. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 64(2), E232–E264. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.3029
  13. Laranjeira, C., Dixe, M. A., Semeão, I., Rijo, S., Faria, C., & Querido, A. (2022). “Keeping the Light On”: A Qualitative Study on Hope Perceptions at the End of Life in Portuguese Family Dyads. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031561
  14. León-Gómez, A., Ruiz-Palomo, D., Fernández-Gámez, M. A., & García-Revilla, M. R. (2021). Sustainable tourism development and economic growth: Bibliometric review and analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042270
  15. Lestari, D. (2013). Diktat of Differential Equations. Yogyakarta.
  16. Li, M., & Walker, R. (2021). Need, justice and central–local relations: The case of social assistance in China. Public Administration, 99(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12689
  17. Minas, R., Jakobsen, V., Kauppinen, T., Korpi, T., & Lorentzen, T. (2018). The governance of poverty: Welfare reform, activation policies, and social assistance benefits and caseloads in Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(5), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717753591
  18. Ministry Social Affairs. (2020). Review the implementation of P2K2, Give Education to KPM PKH at. https://kemensos.go.id/
  19. Moleong, & J., L. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  20. Muldoon, P., & Kirwan, G. (2014). In safe hands: Empowering young people with disabilities who receive assistance with intimate personal care. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 17(3), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1921/13203170308
  21. Nirmalasari, N. O. (2020). Children: Causes and Risk Factors of Stunting in Indonesia’. Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming, 14(1).
  22. Pandey, A. K., & Gautam, A. (2015). Quality of Education, Child Labour and Child Protection Structure: Interrogating the Status of Child Rights in Uttar Pradesh. Social Change, 45(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085714561835
  23. Previtali, P., & Salvati, E. (2019). Social planning and local welfare. The experience of the Italian area social plan. International Planning Studies, 24(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2018.1528864
  24. Priseptian, L., & Primandhana, W. P. (2022). Analysis of the factors that influence poverty. Economic Forum, 24(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i1.10362
  25. Purcal, C., Hamilton, M., Thomson, C., & Cass, B. (2012). From assistance to Prevention: Categorizing young carer support services in Australia, and international implications. Social Policy and Administration, 46(7), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00816.x
  26. Raifu, I. A., & Raheem, A. N. (2018). Do government revenues matter for economic growth? Evidence from Nigeria. European Journal of Government and Economics, 7(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2018.7.1.4333
  27. Siregar, K. E., & Lubis, L. A. (2023). Utilization of Social Capital in Managing Family Planning Village Programs in Rural Communities in Indonesia. Forum for Development Studies, 50(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2023.2178501
  28. son, P. S., & Ronaldo. (2023). Analysis of Factors Causing Poverty as Poverty Alleviation in. Indonesia.Jurnal Registration, 1(2), 87–103.
  29. Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., & Sæbø, O. (2015). Design for social media engagement: Insights from elderly care assistance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.04.002
  30. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2011). Economic Development” (Ninth). Erlangga.
  31. Yunus, R., & Radjab, M. (2018). Poverty Reduction Analysis: Case Studies on the Government Programme of Pangkajene District and the Islands.