Main Article Content

Abstract

The background of this research is the flexible working arrangement system at the Ministry of Finance or the Ministry of Finance in the form of a flexible working space or FWS which has become a new working paradigm and has proven to be effective, has not been able to synthesize sustainable patterns and is still valid only as a privilege. This study aims to analyze the concept of FWS implementation in the Ministry of Finance and synthesize it in alternative sustainable FWS governance. The research uses qualitative methods and a narrative study approach. The research findings show that digital tools are a significant element in the FWS system and are proven to make FWS a system capable of optimizing performance productivity. Digital tools are also one of the driving factors for more flexible and accommodating work demands for employees at the Ministry of Finance. These two interrelated things then make FWS an alternative to new work procedures, which are projected to be not only employee privileges but also the majority of employees. As an implication of the research, an elaboration of the control and evaluation of the FWS, the system adaptability pattern and workload calibration on the FWS scheme is carried out, as well as the calculation of the benefit cost on an ongoing basis in the form of design determination and feasibility tests, periodic performance tests and optimization of the acceleration of the FWS system.

Keywords

Flexibility Working Arrangement Flexibility Working Space Ministry of Finance

Article Details

How to Cite
Salmon, I. P. P. (2024). Readiness of Flexible Working Arrangement: The Narrative Study of Flexibility Working Space at The Ministry of Finance, Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i2.1127

References

  1. Alker, J., Malanca, M., Pottage, C., O’Brien, R., Akhras, D., Ambrose, B., & Wong, J. (2015). Health, Wellbeing and Productivity in Offices. Retrieved from http://www.worldgbc.org/activities/health-wellbeing-productivity-offices/research
  2. Appel-Meulenbroek, R., de Vries, B., & Weggeman, M. (2017). Knowledge Sharing Behavior: The Role of Spatial Design in Buildings. Environment and Behavior, 49(8), 874-903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516673405
  3. Avgoustaki, A., & Bessa, I. (2019). Examining the link between flexible working arrangement bundles and employee work effort. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21969
  4. Azar, S., Khan, A., & Van Eerde, W. (2018). “Modelling linkages between flexible work arrangements’ use and organizational outcomes.” Journal of Business Research, 91, 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.004
  5. Casalino, N., Saso, T., Borin, B., Massella, E., & Lancioni, F. (2020). Digital Competences for Civil Servants and Digital Ecosystems for More Effective Working Processes in Public Organizations. In: Agrifoglio, R., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D., Ricciardi, F. (eds.), Digital Business Transformation. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_21
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  7. De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2016). Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 1051-1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21822
  8. Den Dulk, L., Groeneveld, S., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Valcour, M. (2013). National context in work-life research: A multi-level cross-national analysis of the adoption of workplace work-life arrangements in europe. European Management Journal, 31(5), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.04.010
  9. Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2003). Managerial control of employees working at home. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00271
  10. Gajendran, R., & Harrison, D. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about the telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual concequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
  11. Gupta, A., Suri, P. K., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing the Interaction of Barriers in E-Governance Implementation for Effective Service Quality: Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533718800562
  12. Johari, J., Yean-Tan, F., & TjikZulkarnain, Z. I. (2018). Autonomy, workload, work-life balance and job performance among teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0226
  13. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Aparatus Sipil Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2022, Juni 21). Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Ciptakan Ekosistem Digital dan Fleksibilitas Kerja. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita/penyederhanaan-birokrasi-ciptakan-ekosistem-digital-dan-fleksibilitas-kerja [Ministry of State Civil Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform. (2022, June 21). Simplifying Bureaucracy Create a Digital Ecosystem and Work Flexibility. Retrieved from https://menpan.go.id/site/berita/penyederhanaan-birokrasi-ciptakan-ekosistem-digital-dan-fleksibilitas-kerja]
  14. Kroll, C., & Nüesch, S. (2017). The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: Evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(9), 1505-1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1289548
  15. Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62(6), 795-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709104543
  16. Lee C., Liu, J. Rousseau, D. M, Hui, C., & Cen, Z. X. (2011). Inducements, contributions, and fulfillment in new employee psychological contracts. Human Resource Management, 50(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20415
  17. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Loannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Deveraux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/j.clinepi.2009.06.006
  18. Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(121102), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
  19. Minbaeva, D. (2021). Disrupted HR?. Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100820
  20. Oduor, C. O., Shikongo, S., Iyawa, G. E., Osakwe, J. O., Ujakpa, M., & Amunkete, K. (2020, May). Digital Ecosystem for Public Enterprises: Prospects and Challenges. In 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Afrika), pp. 1-7. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9144042
  21. Petak, T. A and Miller, G. S. (2019, January 1). “Increasing employee motivation and organizational productivity by implementing flex-time.” TIME. 26, 409-423. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2232469313
  22. Rantanen, M. M., Koskinen, J., & Hyrysalmi, S. (2019, May). E-Government Ecosystem: A new view to explain complex phenomenon. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 1408-1413. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8756909
  23. Retnowati, E. (2020, May 11). Flexible Working Space, Budaya Kerja Baru kemenkeu untuk Tingkatkan Produktivitas dan Kinerja Organisasi. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/berita/baca/20571/Flexible-Working-Space-Budaya-Kerja-Baru-kemenkeu-untuk-Tingkatkan-Produktivitas-dan-Kinerja-Organisasi.html
  24. Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2014). Reordering spatial and social relations: A case study of professional and managerial teleworkers. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 724-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12017
  25. Santovec, M. L. (2013). Creating flexible work policies: One size does not fit all. Women in Higher Education, 22(8), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/whe.10483
  26. Schwellnus, C., Geva, A., Pak, M., & Veiel, R. (2019). Gig economy platform: Boon or Bane?. In OECD Economic Department Working Paper, No. 1550. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en
  27. Schwind, H., Uggerslev, K., Wagar, T., Fassina, N. and Bulmash, J. (2019), 12th Ed. Canadian human resource management: A strategic approach. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  28. Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/256375
  29. Spieler, I., Scheibe, S., Stamov-Roßnagel, C., & Kappas, A. (2017). Help or hindrance? Day-level relationships between flextime use, work–nonwork boundaries, and affective well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000153
  30. Stirpe, L., & Zarraga-Oberty, C. (2017). Are high-performance work systems always a valuable retention tool? The roles of workforce feminization and flexible work arrangements. European Management Journal, 35(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.002
  31. Tuan, L. T. (2019). HR Flexibility and Job Crafting in Public Organizations: The Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Public Service Motivation. Group & Organization Management, 44(3), 549-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117741818
  32. Turanligil, F. G., & Farooq, M. (2019). Work-life balance in tourism industry in Contemporary Human Resources Management in the Tourism Industry. IGI Global, 237-274.
  33. Wahyudi, P. A. C., & Atmarani, S. A. (2021, April 23). New Ways of Working of Kementerian Keuangan. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13865/New-Ways-of-Working-Kementerian-Keuangan.html
  34. Wohlers, C., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., & Hertel, G. (2019). The Relation Between Activity-Based Work Environments and Office Workers’ Job Attitudes and Vitality. Environment and Behavior, 51(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738078