Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 253 Download : 188

Main Article Content

Abstract

Initially, the practice of slavery was known as physical violence, this is commonplace in several countries that used to be very thick with the practice of slavery, this era actually transmits various new forms of exploitation, especially through digital media.  This article discusses the practice of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The large number of begging practices on social media TikTok indicates an act of exploitation unnoticed by those who do it, this can be referred to as the practice of slavery.This research uses a netnography qualitative descriptive method by tracing and analyzing accounts that often live stream on  TikTok by selling themselves. This article wants to answer some of the following questions. First, what is Christian Fuchs' view of the practice of slavery? Second, how is the model of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The results of this study show First, that Fuchs views digital media as having shaped the exploitation and commodification of social media, social media often utilizes data and content generated by users as a source of economic value. In this context, social media users are often unpaid "laborers", as they indirectly contribute to creating value for the platform, but rarely get the equivalent in return. Implications: Slavery is not only through physical touch, but through digital technology.

Keywords

Digital Slavery Social Media TikTok Christian Fuchs

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Azka, I. (2023). Digital Slavery in Tiktok Social Media Christian Fuchs Perspective. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(4), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i4.1025

References

  1. Artanto, A. H. & T. (2021). Prinsip-prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia. Genta Publishing.
  2. Bakici, T. (2020). Comparison of crowdsourcing platforms from social-psychological and motivational perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102121
  3. Basuki, U. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Varia Justicia, 13(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v13i2.1887
  4. Bosma, U. (2020). Commodification and slavery in the nineteenth-century Indonesian archipelago. Journal of Social History, 54(1), 109-124. (n.d.).
  5. Chen, C.-Y. (2020). Smartphone addiction: psychological and social factors predict the use and abuse of a social mobile application. Information Communication and Society, 23(3), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1518469
  6. Djerf-Pierre, M., & Pierre, J. (2016). Mediatised local government: Social media activity and media strategies among local government officials 1989-2010. Policy and Politics, 44(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14434624683411
  7. Eklöf, M., Törner, M., & Pousette, A. (2014). Organizational and social-psychological conditions in healthcare and their importance for patient and staff safety: A critical incident study among doctors and nurses. Safety Science, 70, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.007
  8. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and karl marx. Routledge. (n.d.).
  9. Fuchs, C. (2021). Digital Capitalism: Media, Communication and Society Volume Three. Routledge. (n.d.).
  10. Henny Nuraeny, S. H. (2022). Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dan Pencegahannya. Sinar Grafika. (n.d.).
  11. Jang, H., & Park, M. (2020). Social media, media and urban transformation in the context of overtourism. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 6(1), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-08-2019-0145
  12. Jin, D. Y., & Yoon, K. (2016). The social mediascape of transnational Korean pop culture: Hallyu 2.0 as spreadable media practice. New Media and Society, 18(7), 1277–1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554895
  13. Kariri, H. D. H., & Radwan, O. A. (2023). The Influence of Psychological Capital on Individual’s Social Responsibility through the Pivotal Role of Psychological Empowerment: A Study Towards a Sustainable Workplace Environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032720
  14. Leuenberger, C. (2007). Cultures of categories: Psychological diagnoses as institutional and political projects before and after the transition from state socialism in 1989 in east Germany. Osiris, 22, 180–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/521748
  15. Li, Z. (2016). Psychological empowerment on social media: Who are the empowered users? Public Relations Review, 42(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.001
  16. Nasution, A. S. A. (2019). Perbudakan dalam Hukum Islam. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 15(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v15i1.2852
  17. Nugraha, M. T. (2015). 236211208. 9.
  18. Nugroho, C., Sos, S., & Kom, M. I. (2020). Cyber Society: Teknologi, Media Baru, dan Disrupsi Informasi. Prenada Media. (n.d.).
  19. Nuraeny, H. (2015). Pengiriman Tenaga Kerja Migran Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Perbudakan Modern dari Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Migrant Workers, a New Modern-Day Form of Slavery, is a Part of Human Trafficking Crime). Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 4(3), 501–518.
  20. Rahardaya, A. K., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Studi Literatur Penggunaan Media Sosial Tiktok Sebagai Sarana Literasi Digital Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 3(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v3i2.248
  21. Riggs, C. (2017). “Unwrapping the Pharaohs: How Egyptian Archaeology Confirms the Biblical Timeline.” New Leaf Publishing Group. (n.d.).
  22. Rosenfeld, D. L., Balcetis, E., Bastian, B., Berkman, E. T., Bosson, J. K., Brannon, T. N., Burrow, A. L., Cameron, C. D., Chen, S., Cook, J. E., Crandall, C., Davidai, S., Dhont, K., Eastwick, P. W., Gaither, S. E., Gangestad, S. W., Gilovich, T., Gray, K., Haines, E. L., … Tomiyama, A. J. (2022). Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621999374
  23. Rukin, S. P. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia. (n.d.).
  24. Shihab, M. Q. (2018). Islam yang Disalahpahami: Menepis prasangka, mengikis kekeliruan. Lentera Hati Group. (n.d.).
  25. Simonet, D. V, Narayan, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2015). A social-cognitive moderated mediated model of psychological safety and empowerment. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 149(8), 818–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.981496
  26. Ulinnuha, M., & Arifah, N. H. (2020). Perkembangan Makna Milk al-Yamīn. Jurnal Al-Fanar, 3(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v3n2.167-192
  27. Westermann, W. L. (2019). “The Slave Systems of Greek and Roman Antiquity.” The Classical Journal, 115(3), 267-283. (n.d.).
  28. Yang, S., Zhao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2019). Analysis of the Reasons and Development of Short Video Application-Taking Tik Tok as an Example. 2019 9th International Conference on Information and Social Science (ICIS 2019), Iciss, 340–344. https://doi.org/10.25236/iciss.2019.062
  29. Yenny, & Astuti, S. W. (2019). Body Shaming di Dunia Maya: Studi Netnografi pada Akun Youtube Rahmawati Kekeyi Putri Cantika Body Shaming in The Virtual: Netnographic Study on Youtube Accounts Rahmawati Kekeyi Putri Cantika. Universitas, 1, 166–188.
  30. Zahid, A. ., Riza Laely Ikayanti, & Nitia Agustini Kala Ayu. (2023). Indonesia After Covid-19: In The Shadow of Tiktok. Asketik, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v7i1.987
  31. Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Allgaier, J. (2021). Reposting “Till Albert Einstein Is TikTok Famous”: The Memetic Construction of Science on TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3216–3247.