Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of market concentration in construction work tenders in West Papua and to investigate the correlation between the market concentration index and the average participation in tenders, the number of work packages, and average tender savings. West Papua has privileges in procurement and has special autonomy funds for development. The study uses tender data from 2018-2022 and employs the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and Concentration Ratio 4 (CR4) to calculate market concentration. The results indicate that, based on HHI, the market concentration in the building construction and civil engineering subsectors is generally low, except for civil engineering in 2022. However, based on CR4, the market concentration in the building construction subsector is moderate, and in the civil engineering subsector, it is low, except for 2018. Moreover, there is a negative correlation between the number of packages and average participants, as well as between the number of packages and CR4 values. The findings of this study can be useful for construction providers to understand the competition in tenders and assist the government in developing competitive procurement strategies. Future research can investigate the economic benefits of local West Papua businesses when market concentration is low.

Keywords

Concentration Ratio Government Procurement Herfindahl-Hirschman Index Tender

Article Details

How to Cite
Johantri, B., Aprilia, R., & Sopian, S. (2023). Market Concentration in Construction Tenders in West Papua. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 4(2), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i2.709

References

  1. Ardimansyah. (2022). Alokasi Dana Otsus & DTI TA 2021 dan TA.2022 per Kab/Kota. DJPK.
  2. Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Skitmore, M., Pellicer, E., & Gutiérrez-Bahamondes, J. H. (2016). Improving the estimation of probability of bidder participation in procurement auctions. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.001
  3. Berkovich, M. I., Ismailov, M. I., & Zhegalov, N. (2021). Internet Services Market: Assessment of the Level of Competition and Competitiveness of the Main Providers. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness, 3, 57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52957/27821927_2021_3_57
  4. Carter, W. K. (2006). Cost accounting (14th ed.). Thomson.
  5. Diaby, A., & Sylwester, K. (2015). Corruption and Market Competition: Evidence from Post-Communist Countries. World Development, 66, 487–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.003
  6. Dinarjito, A. (2022). Struktur Pasar Industri Konstruksi Di Indonesia Tahun 2018-2021. Jurnalku, 2(3), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v2i3.279
  7. Hanák, T., Drozdová, A., & Marović, I. (2021). Bidding Strategy in Construction Public Procurement: A Contractor’s Perspective. Buildings, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020047
  8. Huda, S. N., Setiani, N., Pulungan, R., & Winarko, E. (2017). Potential fraudulent behaviors in e-procurement implementation in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 185(1), 12003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/185/1/012003
  9. Johantri, B., & Aprilia, R. (2021). Penawaran Harga Pekerjaan Konstruksi Pemerintah di Era Pandemi (Studi Empiris Pada Kementerian Keuangan). Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Publik, 5(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.31092/jmkp.v5i1.1229
  10. Johantri, B., Sopian, S., & Sukmono, R. (2022). Pengaruh Waktu Pemasukan Dokumen, Jumlah Partisipan, dan Tingkat Inflasi terhadap Persentase Hasil Tender pada Kementerian Keuangan. Strategic: Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Bisnis, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/strategic.v22i1.45662
  11. Kawai, K., & Nakabayashi, J. (2022). Detecting large-scale collusion in procurement auctions. Journal of Political Economy, 130(5), 1364–1411. https://doi.org/10.1086/718913
  12. Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2015). An experimental study of precautionary bidding. European Economic Review, 78, 27–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.04.009
  13. LKPP. (2021). Peraturan LKPP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Melalui Penyedia. In Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
  14. LKPP. (2022). Overview Rencana Umum Pengadaan (RUP) Tahun Anggaran 2022. https://datastudio.google.com/u/1/reporting/4482ff4e-f62b-4454-98eb-7ebae94e3401/page/IjAmC
  15. Mansawan, I. S. K. (2021). Efektivitas Implementasi Perpres No. 17 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah dalam Mempercepat Pembangunan di Provinsi Papua Barat.
  16. McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions with entry. Economics Letters, 23(4), 343–347.
  17. Nani, D. A., & Ali, S. (2020). Determinants of Effective E-Procurement System: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Local Governments. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 7(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i1.15671
  18. Pavic, I., Galetic, F., & Piplica, D. (2016). Similarities and differences between the CR and HHI as an indicator of market concentration and market power. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2016/23193
  19. Peleckis, K. (2022). Determining the level of market concentration in the construction sector—case of application of the HHI index. Sustainability, 14(2), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020779
  20. Podwol, J. U., & Schneider, H. S. (2016). Nonstandard bidder behavior in real-world auctions. European Economic Review, 83, 198–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.12.012
  21. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
  22. Raharjo, K., & Gultom, Y. M. L. (2022). Pengaruh Jumlah Penawar Terhadap Harga Pemenang Pada Pengadaan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Pemerintah Daerah. GemaEkonomi, 11(5), 1080–1092.
  23. Rajala, P., Ylä-Kujala, A., Sinkkonen, T., & Kärri, T. (2022). Profitability in construction: how does building renovation business fare compared to new building business. Construction Management and Economics, 40(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2032228
  24. Ryvkin, D., & Serra, D. (2020). Corruption and competition among bureaucrats: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 175, 439–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.12.026
  25. Salman, M., & Survanto, Y. (2019). Analysis and Development of Information Security Framework for Distributed E-Procurement System. 2019 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.23919/EECSI48112.2019.8976944
  26. Škuflić, L., Mlinarić, D., & Družić, M. (2018). Determinants of construction sector profitability in Croatia. Zbornik Radova Ekonomski Fakultet u Rijeka, 36(1), 335–352.
  27. Svoboda, P. (2016). Analysis of market concentration in selected sectors of public procurement. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(3), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031073
  28. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x
  29. Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2021). Market concentration, market power, and firm growth of construction companies. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9990846
  30. Watson, J. (2013). Strategy: an introduction to game theory (Third Edit). WW Norton New York.
  31. Wibowo, A. Y., Gamarefa, T., Partohap, T. H., Susilo, W. D., & Wijayanti, A. (2021). Survey Penilaian Integritas Tahun 2021. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
  32. Wicaksono, A. P., Urumsah, D., & Asmui, F. (2017). The implementation of E-procurement system: Indonesia evidence. SHS Web of Conferences, 34, 10004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173410004
  33. Williams-Elegbe, S. (2018). Systemic corruption and public procurement in developing countries: are there any solutions? Journal of Public Procurement, 18(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2018-009