Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 228 Download : 12594

Main Article Content

Abstract

Based on temporary research, there are still many taxpayers who are not obedient in fulfilling their taxes, such as paying taxes not on time and not by the amount of tax owed. This study aims to find out and analyze the Restaurant Tax Audit Analysis in the Framework of Testing Taxpayer Compliance at the South Jakarta City Administration Regional Revenue Tribe in 2021. The research method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method. The criteria for the sources that the author uses as informants (parties/interviewees) in this study are those who control and understand the conditions of the research object, who are involved or occupy positions related to the topic under study, and have sufficient time to be interviewed. Restaurant Tax Audit in the Context of Testing Taxpayer Compliance at the Regional Revenue Sub-District of the City of South Jakarta Administration has been carried out well, especially from the audit procedures and audit results, but the ability of the tax authorities still needs to be improved.

Keywords

Restaurant Tax Audit

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ramdan, A., & Sinaga, T. S. (2022). Restaurant Tax Audit Analysis in the Order to Test Taxpayer Compliance at Suku Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Administrasi Jakarta Selatan in 2021. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(3), 320-327. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i3.532

References

  1. Anugrahi, R., Manossoh, H., & Tangkuman, S. J. (2018). Analisis Kontribusi Pajak Restoran Terhadap Pendapatan Pajak Daerah Pada Badan Pengelola Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. GOING CONCERN : JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.04.20981.2018
  2. Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (8th ed.). Rineka Cipta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=217760
  3. Benkraiem, R., Uyar, A., Kilic, M., & Schneider, F. (2021). Ethical behavior, auditing strength, and tax evasion: A worldwide perspective. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 43, 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100380
  4. Campa, D., Ginesti, G., Allini, A., & Casciello, R. (2022). Chief financial officer co-option and tax avoidance in European listed firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(1), 106935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106935
  5. Chen, G., Qi, Y., Liu, F., & Xing, F. (2022). Taxation officers’ grassroots work experience and tax performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 80, 101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101463
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (S. Z. Qudsy (ed.); 3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1213690
  7. Dantes, H. P., & Lasminiasih. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Efektivitas dan Kontribusi Pajak Restoran Terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah di Provinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(12), 2743–2750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i12.537
  8. Eulaiwi, B., Al-Hadi, A., Taylor, G., Dutta, S., Duong, L., & Richardson, G. (2021). Tax haven Use, the pricing of audit and Non-audit Services, suspicious matters reporting obligations and whistle blower hotline Facilities: Evidence from Australian financial corporations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(2), 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2021.100262
  9. Farhah, S., Pahala, I., & Muliasari, I. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Reklame di DKI Jakarta. JAPA: Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan, Dan Auditing, 2(3), 537–557. http://pub.unj.ac.id/index.php/japa/article/view/408
  10. García-Meca, E., Ramón-Llorens, M.-C., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2021). Are narcissistic CEOs more tax aggressive? The moderating role of internal audit committees. Journal of Business Research, 129, 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.043
  11. Gnap, J., & Konečný, V. (2015). Motor Vehicle Taxation in the Slovak Republic and its Impacts in the Context of Fiscal Decentralization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34(15), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01639-1
  12. Goldman, N. C., Harris, M. K., & Omer, T. C. (2022). Does task-specific knowledge improve audit quality: Evidence from audits of income tax accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 99, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101320
  13. Hasanah, N., & Indriani, S. (2013). Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Self Assessment System dan Modernisasi Administrasi Pajak Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pajak (Studi Kasus Pada KPP Kebon Jeruk 1). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi, 8(1), 17–35. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/wahana-akuntansi/article/view/651
  14. Herawati, H., Tabroni, R., & Lusiana, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of The Tax Regulation Socialization Strategies on Tax Payers’ Comprehension and Compliance in Implementing Their Tax Obligations. The International Journal of Business Review (The Jobs Review), 1(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.17509/tjr.v1i2.12980
  15. Huang, S.-H., Yu, M.-M., & Huang, Y.-L. (2022). Evaluation of the efficiency of the local tax administration in Taiwan: Application of a dynamic network data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101337
  16. Kadir, A., Lubis, A. A., & Isnaini, I. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Administrasi Manunggal Satu Atap di Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v11i2.13860
  17. Kasper, M., & Alm, J. (2022). Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.003
  18. Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related media coverage and its impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.11.001
  19. Klaser, K., & Mittone, L. (2022). Can the rawlsian veil of ignorance foster tax compliance? Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.05.018
  20. Kolias, G., & Koumanakos, E. (2022). CEO duality and tax avoidance: Empirical evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100465
  21. Lewis, B. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Hendrawan, A. (2020). Political accountability and public service delivery in decentralized Indonesia: Incumbency advantage and the performance of second term mayors. European Journal of Political Economy, 64, 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101910
  22. Lovianna, L., & Rahmi, N. (2022). Analisis Efektivitas Dan Kontribusi Pajak Daerah Sebagai Sumber Pendapatan Asli Daerah (Studi Pada Bapenda Dki Jakarta Tahun 2016-2020). Jurnal Pajak Vokasi (JUPASI), 3(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.31334/jupasi.v3i2.2212
  23. Ma, Y., Jiang, H., & Xiao, W. (2021). Tax evasion, audits with memory, and portfolio choice. International Review of Economics & Finance, 71, 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.10.010
  24. Masrullah, M., Asriati, A., & Alfiah S, N. R. (2021). Penerapan Self Assesstment System dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran atas Kepatuhan Membayar Pajak di Kabupaten Gowa. Amnesty: Jurnal Riset Perpajakan, 4(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.26618/jrp.v4i1.5304
  25. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (38th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305
  26. Noviyanti, A. (2021). Analisis Potensi Pajak Hotel dan Terealisasinya Penerimaan Pajak Hotel di Bapenda DKI Jakarta [Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika]. https://elibrary.bsi.ac.id/tugasakhir/M16220210018/analisis-potensi-pajak-hotel-dan-terealisasinya-penerimaan-pajak-hotel-di-bapenda-dki-jakarta
  27. Patriandari, & Amalia, H. (2022). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan, Kesadaran Wajib Pajak dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib PBB-P2 Pada BAPENDA Jakarta Timur Tahun 2020. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(1), 48–56. https://uia.e-journal.id/Akrual/article/view/2025
  28. Popa, M. (2014). Taxes, Fees and Obligations in Romania – Main Components of Companies’ Fiscal Costs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.435
  29. Reck, D., Slemrod, J., & Vattø, T. E. (2022). Public disclosure of tax information: Compliance tool or social network? Journal of Public Economics, 212, 104708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104708
  30. Rusli, Y. M. (2019). Pengaruh Efektivitas Penerapan E-filling dan Modernisasi Sistem Perpajakan Indonesia Terhadap Efektivitas Pemrosesan Data Perpajakan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v12i1.1509
  31. Schneider, G., Scholze, A., & Meißner, F. (2021). Asymmetric taxation, limited liability, and agency conflicts. Management Accounting Research, 51, 100739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100739
  32. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D – MPKK (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  33. Walasik, A. (2015). The Propensity to Tax Competition: The Case of Implementation Local Tax Policy by Polish Local Governments. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2015.03.01.004
  34. Wulandari, S., Ilat, V., & Sabijono, H. (2014). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Pajak Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Pada KPP Pratama Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 2(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.2.2.2014.4871
  35. Yin, R. K. (2012). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23279888
  36. Zaimah, T. (2016). Efektivitas Sistem Self Assessment dalam Pajak Penghasilan di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Batu. Jurnal Jurisdictie, 7(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v7i1.3678