Main Article Content

Abstract

Local governments continuously strive to provide the best public services to their citizens, one of which is tax administration services through digital platforms. Each region faces unique challenges in developing an online system for local tax administration, making it crucial to understand the factors influencing the effectiveness of these services. This study uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a conceptual framework and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) using the Smart PLS application to analyze the factors affecting the acceptance of the Local Tax Administration System (SiPAD) by 131 taxpayers in Boyolali Regency. The results of hypothesis testing reveal that experience, compatibility, complexity, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness have varying impacts on the acceptance of SiPAD, with three hypotheses accepted and seven rejected. These findings underscore the importance of making SiPAD user-friendly, compatible, and perceived as useful to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of tax administration and increase local tax revenue. The study also highlights the need for adequate training and socialization for taxpayers to keep pace with rapid technological developments. A well-implemented system is expected to expand the taxpayer base and support the success of local tax administration reforms.

Keywords

Local Tax Administration Digital Tax Services Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) Taxpayer Adoption

Article Details

How to Cite
Antoro, A. F. S., & Thaha, A. R. (2025). Analysis of the Acceptance of the Local Tax Administration System Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 6(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijtc.v6i3.1446

References

  1. Adeyeye, G. B. (2019). Improving Tax Administration Through Technology Innovation in Nigeria (A Study of Federal Inland Revenue Service). Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series, 1(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.26458/1913
  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior BT - Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann, Eds.; pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  3. Amalia, A. G. R., & Fahrudi, A. N. L. I. (2021). The Relationship Between Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Loss of Control with User Satisfaction in Mandatory Setting BT - Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference on Public and Business Administration (AICoBPA 2020. 171–173. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210928.034
  4. Amaliah, St. M., Hafiar, H., & Dewi, R. (2023). Analisis Aksesibilitas Website Pemerintah Provinsi Indonesia Sebagai Implementasi Corporate Digital Responsibility terhadap E-Government. Prologia, 7(2), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.24912/pr.v7i2.24456
  5. Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25.
  6. Chang, I. C., Li, Y. C., Hung, W. F., & Hwang, H. G. (2005). An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on taxpayers’ acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.002
  7. Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing–An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 251–262.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1987). User Acceptance of Information Systems : The Technology Acceptance Models (TAM) (Working Paper 529). Wiley. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/b/busadwp/images/b/1/4/b1409190.0001.001.pdf
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  10. Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information \& Management, 36(1), 9–21.
  11. Dorasamy, M., Marimuthu, M., Raman, M., & Kaliannan, M. (2010). E-Government Services Online: An Exploratory Study on Tax E-Filing in Malaysia. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 6(4), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2010100102
  12. Fu, J.-R., Farn, C.-K., & Chao, W.-P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 43(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
  13. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2000). The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008
  14. Ghanifia, A., Amalia, R., Nugroho, A., & Fahrudi, L. I. (2021). The Relationship Between Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Loss of Control with User Satisfaction in Mandatory Setting.
  15. Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Metode alternatif dengan partial least square (pls). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  16. Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357–389.
  17. Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 222–230.
  18. Lhassan, I. A., Bedraoui, O., & Akhannich, O. (2022). The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Satisfaction of Tax Administration Users in Morocco During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Management Issues, 30(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.15421/192205
  19. Maiga, G., & Asianzu, E. (2013). Adoption of e–tax services in Uganda: a model of citizen–based factors. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 10(3–4), 259–283.
  20. Maulana, R. Y. (2020). Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of E-Government-Based Public Services Inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 5(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7317
  21. Mpinganjira, M. (2015). Perceived ease of use: Examining its influence on personal use of the tax e-filing system. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877015500030
  22. Muliati, N. (n.d.). PENGARUH PERCEIVED USEFULNESS, PERCEIVED EASE OF USE, ATTITUDE TOWARD USING DAN BEHAVIOR INTENTION TO USE TERHADAP ACTUAL SYSTEM USE DALAM IMPLEMENTASI TEKNOLOGI ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEM (STUDI PADA END USER ERP SYSTEM DI PT SEMEN GRESIK).
  23. Muliati, N. (2019). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, Attitude Toward Using Dan Behavior Intention To Use Terhadap Actual System Use Dalam Implementasi Teknologi Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System (Studi Pada End User ERP System Di PT Semen Gresik). Jurnal Manajemen Dan Inovasi (MANOVA), 2(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.15642/manova.v2i2.191
  24. Mustapha, B., & Obid, S. N. Bt. S. (2015a). Tax Service Quality: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Ease of Use of the Online Tax System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.328
  25. Mustapha, B., & Obid, S. N. Bt. S. (2015b). Tax Service Quality: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Ease of Use of the Online Tax System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.328
  26. Nations, U. (2023). UN E-Government Knowledgebase. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Overview
  27. Nugroho, M. A., Dewanti, P. W., & Novitasari, B. T. (2018). The Impact of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Student’s Performance in Mandatory E-Learning Use. 2018 International Conference on Applied Information Technology and Innovation (ICAITI), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAITI.2018.8686742
  28. Nugroho, R. A., & Purbokusumo, Y. (2020). E-Government Readiness: Penilaian Kesiapan Aktor Utama Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia. Iptek-Kom, 22(1), 1–17.
  29. Rakhmawati, H., Sutrisno T, S., & Khoiru Rusydi, M. (2020). Influence of TAM and UTAUT models of the use of e-filing on tax compliance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.576
  30. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 240–253.
  31. Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, R\&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  32. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  34. Wang, Y.-S. (2003). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.005
  35. Wirawan, V. (2020). Penerapan E-Government dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Kontemporer di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1101
  36. Wiyono, G. (2011). Merancang penelitian bisnis dengan alat analisis SPSS 17.0 & Smart PLS 2.0. Yogyakarta: Upp Stim Ykpn, 8.
  37. Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2000). The influence of persuasion, training, and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation.
  38. Zahra, L., Salsabila, Z., & Meiryani. (2023). Assessing Perception and Actual Usage of the E-Tax System as a VAT Periodic Tax Return Reporting System: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on E-Business, Management and Economics, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616712.3616772